Lugar: Bipartisan approach needed on climate bill

Sen. Richard Lugar is urging President Barack Obama to endorse a bipartisan climate change bill that reflects the nation's
"economic realities" and does not include the new carbon-based fuel taxes sought by Democratic leaders.

The Indiana Republican, who's sponsoring a rival climate and energy bill, said the Democratic proposal to cap carbon
dioxide emissions will go nowhere this year in Congress because of concerns over its effect on the fragile economy.

He said his bill's provisions have a better chance of passage because they focus instead on boosting energy efficiencies
and cutting greenhouse gas emissions.

"I encourage President Obama to make bipartisanship the starting point of our energy debate, not divisive carbon-pricing
schemes," Lugar said in a statement Tuesday before Obama addressed the nation on the Gulf Coast oil spill.

A leading climate bill sponsored by Sens. John Kerry, D-Mass., and Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., seeks to tax carbon dioxide emissions
produced by coal-fired power plants and other large polluters to reduce pollution blamed for global warming.

Lugar's bill includes incentives to expand nuclear power, boost alternative energy, switch from foreign to domestic oil
and upgrade buildings to make them more energy-efficient. It also would require utilities to retire aging coal-fired power
plants by 2018.

Lugar press secretary Andy Fisher said Wednesday that if it becomes law, the bill would save Americans and U.S. businesses
money on their energy bills and cut the nation's dependence on foreign oil. He said it also would create new jobs by boosting
the industry of retrofitting buildings to make them more energy-efficient.

Environmental groups have expressed disappointment with Lugar's bill, including its lack of a carbon cap-and-trade provision.
Such a provision, backed by the Obama administration, would set overall limits on carbon dioxide pollution but allow companies
to pollute more by paying for it and buying pollution credits from cleaner companies.

The Sierra Club's executive director, Michael Brune, said in a statement after Lugar introduced his bill last week that
it had many shortcomings and "is simply not the right path to a clean energy economy."

Tony Kreindler, a spokesman for the Environmental Defense Fund, said Wednesday that the group believes Lugar's bill has
some "very good ideas," particularly its emphasis on energy efficiency. But he also said the lack of carbon controls
is disappointing.

He noted that an analysis by the Environmental Protection Agency concluded that Kerry and Lieberman's bill would cost
households an average of $79 to $146 per year.

"It's a very small price tag when you consider the benefits and in particular the cost of inaction," Kreindler
said. "And that's something the president was very clear about last night — that the most damaging and expensive
course for the country is not doing anything at all."

Fisher said Lugar would support some type of cap-and-trade provision when the economy is stronger, if it's determined
that idea would be workable.

Rob Stone, an energy analyst with investment bankers Cowen & Co., said any climate change bill with a carbon tax provision
has little chance of passing Congress this year, partly because of concerns about its potential economic impact. He also noted
that midterm elections are five months away.

Legislation that focuses on energy efficiencies, such as Lugar's bill, might have a better chance of passage, Stone said.
But he added that voters appear too preoccupied with the economy, jobs and the federal deficit to be concerned with climate
change.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: IBJ is now using a new comment system. Your Disqus account will no longer work on the IBJ site. Instead, you can leave a comment on stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Past comments are not currently showing up on stories, but they will be added in the coming weeks. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.