Legislation could change Indiana annexation rules

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Cities and towns could no longer annex property owners against their will if Indiana lawmakers follow recommendations of a study committee when they reconvene in January.

The panel has recommended several changes to Indiana's annexation code, including eliminating involuntary annexations and lowering the percentage of homeowners required for a remonstrance, The Herald Bulletin reported of Anderson reported.

Under the proposal, annexations could occur only if 51 percent or more of affected property owners agree. The committee also wants to reduce the percentage required to fight annexation to 51 percent for a remonstrance, compared with 65 percent currently.

The recommendations will be put into a bill when the session convenes in January. The language of the bill will be hashed out in various committees, so more changes are possible.

"I think we've had an excellent and thorough discussion on the issues so far," committee chair Rep. Sharon Negele said. "But we've got a lot of work left to do."

Committee member Rep. Bob Cherry, R-Greenfield, said he also would like to see legislation address how municipalities attempting to annex the same area of land should proceed.

"Something is needed there," Cherry said. "But that may be an issue for another day and another study committee."

Cherry's district has seen plenty of fighting among municipalities over available land. This past spring, land near Interstate 69 was eyed by Lapel, Pendleton and Ingalls. Legal battles have raged in the past few years among the communities.

Several residents of the Brownsburg area, which has seen many annexations recently, asked the committee to abolish involuntary annexation.

"Indiana is one of only two states in the U.S. with involuntary annexation," said Curt Disser, one of the residents protesting the Brownsburg annexations. "These annexations are driven by one factor: money for the municipalities."

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In