Press should referee political donations

Keywords Opinion

The first part of IBJ’s [Jan. 12] editorial makes the common sense case for transparency regarding campaign contributions.

Where I have a problem is suggesting that with high campaign contributions comes risk of undue influence and “quid pro quos.” IBJ is essentially saying that good candidates with integrity can’t be bought for say, $5,000, but they sure can for $100,000.

By limiting contribution dollar amounts, an essential freedom is being denied. The answer is in having a competitive, watch-dog press that will inform the public on the candidates and the contributors.

I suspect the publisher of IBJ would rightly fight any restrictions on his right to print what he wants when he wants at whatever cost he incurs.

Political speech is the most protected speech by the Constitution and it is the most important category of expression.

John L. Sorg, McCordsville

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets on
{{ count_down }}