Letter: Will indifference save Brainard?

Samm Quinn’s excellent analysis of the Carmel primary election [Challenger sees Carmel’s debt debate as way to topple Brainard, Feb. 22] raises a serious question about the incumbent mayor’s integrity.

The mayor challenges the $1.3 billion debt reported by the Indiana Department of Local Government Finance, saying the city actually owes $874 million. He does not cite his source for the $874 million figure and says it includes $15 million in bonds to be issued for a luxury hotel.

Oddly, the mayor’s own administration reports the DLGF numbers. Those numbers include $810 million for debt principal. They do not include interest which would, presumably, add to the debt not reduce it. And the city is seeking $18 million in bonds for the hotel, not $15 million.

Moreover, the mayor’s casual handling of other people’s money has been demonstrated in his flawed financial forecasting: published reports on costs of the Palladium began with his $17 million estimate and ended with a $175 million cost; a $10-$15 million estimate as Carmel’s share of the Keystone improvement project that cost locals $60 million, and—most recently—the $32 million estimate for the luxury hotel now estimated by his own staff at $41 million (and counting).

They mayor’s challenge is to get his facts straight—at least once.

Most tragic is, as Quinn points out, the mayor was re-elected in 2015 by a mere 15 percent of Carmel’s 63,335 registered voters.

Glynn’s challenge is not the incumbent mayor but the epidemic indifference of Carmel voters.


William Shaffer

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets in {{ count_down }} days.