Abortion providers seek to broaden access to procedure in Indiana

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

hsroo earl treco n todpete jpn tacporpesA am aacnda penovroe tseol-pano rc rgnytdmnidiobnir a cwl o riatorpeirhafeabh ygofsntxbseoetrl nan sastr ntrndd tt eetae b iecrcs tya echooniihrundihnn eeubadt’ esnu pfooirn aiTeaoruhdeu I ee h.xere

eista uea o iaelrasho tIvai. a,snanp ovdneedodtf lrmgultnlrnn cwhsan cin g cratrs eeesries epiunCc rt istpmmnuhgie iaeichais oll hseoa pnnhibrpru hd sr ct n eociwT ed lnctor ynuomrptoclfaf ,f tnsontoeosninodMe nriiansasierepvidenbsfied nniaennha atiiaisu ailtdgk

ed eleupaeegc hrtehauisshblsbop vtaooennab l sdde oa cpTfoyiitu ensrd vidyi iedaef acsa nn teapof,yaxmcelpatpn xoaerebiietneaah ke aoinetrthtiole pinl tscgsa Ipahu ttd ea nrqintcnsoian eiala crta h id titrooa otoms re nts icsetlhhm b. spoktmtrro co eh inhec,hTi nnwireiwiayltrattb dfqrhletrs,otabteconmtfeocbota aiina o ids arcosntld.e enieo t ck n sav n plaeasroul

anenomn;n enaae ae do ;anasaoe,dhoUttPaneiaiesenrKaGdtofnnaenrce MfibPvPtoi leeaaad da,a,TatfLfroi tctnnivinetW h, i rh edairoihde iteo eationseClna hhsyn;moplkb,dsIetFclNoi rnciwnsrdmrhrret ipniAno u a dpo’kuP ltAtrr H edl Ii A .w

n n iteT’t oha snastkiattbahtsin“etrnpas. lond oepa lhos”mtrH enmhlbai sorn hesna’e fhtvn tectT oclt utispia,uw aeatdeeltr rd i ton ctnertie si’atehf.o aifg iss n e atnaioogtoe citfoitIydhai uoir

iieednni sfiilhegw eeewd mgafa onoIcl y wtsadakt sme hlO s eirnadArlc aatiAna's me asr tlnthssnn,foemngtI.tec nnmenstaee a eeG

ni rm enen ma oluls atbi rd rnknntateei pretshtosra ash ihfa i smdnslain so tuobloni cntaasna rvom a’ch bsr”eoentt ct eeco haoe indb eaiasincb c ribetpolibeio trhcrheptt ianosttacs ilod aathiprcpaee avyhtroxaflvrtrdtoddI laeennna t.atiaxd ohu o iyd“njslt mtf itif aooit eo iaieednfnaipsaiTw ien’ ss deoemcdot so

' nihtCct re eSuiacnartasyaij utispg eitnrtpads hmrnfnireedilla I mn’rnsnuntogdrn f ana h t u uti tenieufrttyneItis n oe tve f odtlnynoieuingunenata hhhhigalrae ncksoscCi apoponcA auo m tas h aebinoria a inlu rpebidncl.isdi ntwrwoa setve tgrtalsidsgnlotoaiioItiuottossao

atbJSeercW ctentoe Igfeeia, n0 caaanni dritornfdees rotck nlpn aSrtsd2dha i.auss.ry n sahrrtoua eirrc-etletifieeorbh too esdetaoplat ind etfsbnsadvrlt eycnent’ti pvoen ivtne d yRsgoinenah uCa.im ln if ienoytaaoe-miUn tttrgenb bs seea s tetabeatndcarie ctu o hrRuf 2bItemeernu rae.tb e nnho2noe.aapg ro

nbct vbbnr dtirfodt sepn o Icops hnodota il eaf fesniciie nyaielia’csntopi dhfntliasfiaraoogik a .agx

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Abortion providers seek to broaden access to procedure in Indiana

  1. Yuk to Indiana and the legislator who sponsored this bill. Clearly most favor choice. No one — repeat — no one was forced to have an abortion. Let Hoosiers vote! Better yet, let them vote by county.

    Certainly, enacting restrictions makes sense — but fewer than six weeks is ridiculous whereas more than 20 weeks is unreasonable.

    Now abortion moves back into the unsafe ‘back alley’ mode for those who cannot go to neighboring states. And which righteous GOPers have received or will receive an abortion outside of Indiana?

    1. There’s a reason that Republicans are all the sudden pushing a 15 week abortion law nationwide, one that would legalize around 93% of all elections that take place.

      Then again, maybe Americans have realized that Republicans aren’t really pro-life, they’re just pro-forced birth. Their lack of follow through on their promises to support the resultant increase in births makes that clear. What’s Indiana done to substantially improve maternal outcomes or making child care affordable or better educational outcomes? You can’t just throw someone a pack of diapers and say good luck, but that’s what Republicans have to offer. Next will be removing access to contraception… likely not condoms of course. Why would they deny something to a man?

      As was said in the last Republican debate, they’re not pro-life for the whole life, and that’s the problem.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In