Biden meets with Republicans on virus aid, but rejects compromise

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

President Joe Biden told Republican senators during a two-hour meeting he’s unwilling to settle on an insufficient coronavirus aid package after they pitched their slimmed down $618 billion proposal that’s a fraction of the $1.9 trillion he is seeking.

No compromise was reached in the lengthy session Monday night, Biden’s first with lawmakers at the White House, and Democrats in Congress pushed ahead with groundwork for approving his COVID relief plan with or without Republican votes. Despite the Republican group’s appeal for bipartisanship, as part of Biden’s efforts to unify the country, the president made it clear he won’t delay aid in hopes of winning GOP support.

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said that while there were areas of agreement, “the president also reiterated his view that Congress must respond boldly and urgently, and noted many areas which the Republican senators’ proposal does not address.”

She said, “He will not slow down work on this urgent crisis response, and will not settle for a package that fails to meet the moment.”

The two sides are far apart, with the Republican group of 10 senators focused primarily on the health care crisis and smaller $1,000 direct aid to Americans, and Biden leading Democrats toward a more sweeping rescue package, three times the size, to shore up households, local governments and a partly shuttered economy.

On a fast track, the goal is to have COVID relief approved by March, when extra unemployment assistance and other pandemic aid expires, testing the ability of the new administration and Congress to deliver, with political risks for all sides from failure.

Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine called the meeting a “frank and very useful” conversation, noting that the president also filled in some details on his proposal.

“All of us are concerned about struggling families, teetering small businesses and an overwhelmed health care system,” said Collins, flanked by other senators outside the White House.

Republicans are tapping into bipartisan urgency to improve the nation’s vaccine distribution and vastly expand virus testing with $160 billion in aid. That is similar to what Biden has proposed. But from there, the two plans drastically diverge.

The GOP’s $1,000 direct payments would go to fewer households than the $1,400 Biden has proposed, and the Republicans offer only a fraction of what he wants to reopen schools.

They also would give nothing to states, money that Democrats argue is just as important, with $350 billion in Biden’s plan to keep police, fire and other workers on the job.

Gone are Democratic priorities such as a gradual lifting of the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour.

Wary Democrats pushed ahead at the Capitol, unwilling to take too much time in courting GOP support that may not materialize or in delivering too meager a package that they believe doesn’t address the scope of the nation’s health crisis and economic problems.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer warned that history is filled with “the costs of small thinking.”

House and Senate Democrats released a separate budget resolution Monday a step toward approving Biden’s package with a reconciliation process that wouldn’t depend on Republican support for passage.

“The cost of inaction is high and growing, and the time for decisive action is now,” Schumer and Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in a statement.

The accelerating talks came as the Congressional Budget Office delivered mixed economic forecasts Monday with robust growth expected at a 4.5% annual rate but employment rates not to return to pre-pandemic levels for several years.

The overture from the coalition of 10 GOP senators, mostly centrists, was an attempt to show that at least some in the Republican ranks want to work with Biden’s new administration, rather than simply operating as the opposition in the minority in Congress.

Asked if Biden had shown a willingness to reduce his $1.9 trillion top line, Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, said, “He didn’t say that, nor did we say we’re willing to come up” from the GOP plan. He said it’s “too early” to say if a deal can be reached.

But in echoes of the 2009 financial crisis, Democrats warn against too small a package as they believe happened during the Obama administration’s attempt to pull the nation toward recovery.

Psaki said earlier Monday there is “obviously a big gap” between the $1.9 trillion package Biden has proposed and the $618 billion counteroffer.

An invitation to the GOP senators to meet with Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris at the White House came hours after the lawmakers sent Biden a letter on Sunday urging him to negotiate rather than try to ram through his relief package solely on Democratic votes.

The cornerstone of the GOP plan is $160 billion for the health care response—vaccine distribution, a “massive expansion” of testing, protective gear and funds for rural hospitals, according to a draft.

It also includes $20 billion to reopen schools compared to $170 billion in Biden’s plan. The Republicans offer $40 billion for Paycheck Protection Program business aid.

Under the GOP proposal, $1,000 direct payments would go to individuals earning up to $40,000 a year, or $80,000 for couples. The proposal would begin to phase out the benefit after that, with no payments for individuals earning more than $50,000, or $100,000 for couples. That’s less than Biden’s proposal of $1,400 direct payments at higher incomes levels, up to $300,000 for some households.

The meeting, though private, was Biden’s most public involvement in the negotiations.

Winning the support of 10 Republicans would be significant for Biden, potentially giving him the votes needed in the 50-50 Senate where Harris is the tie-breaker. Or he can push it through the budget reconciliation process, which would allow the bill to pass with a 51-vote majority in the Senate, rather than the 60 votes typically needed to advance legislation.

The White House remains committed to exploring avenues for bipartisanship even as it prepares for Democrats to move alone on a COVID relief bill, according to a senior administration official granted anonymity to discuss the private thinking.

At the same time, the White House may be willing to adjust its ask, perhaps shifting some less virus-oriented aspects into a package that is set to go next before Congress, the official said.

Biden himself has been on the phone to some of the Republicans, the official said.

Besides Collins and Cassidy, the GOP senators meeting with Biden were Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Mitt Romney of Utah, Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, Todd Young of Indiana, Jerry Moran of Kansas, Rob Portman of Ohio, Thom Tillis of North Carolina. Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota joined by phone.

Biden has leaned on his resume of decades in the Senate and as vice president to bring the parties together, but less than two weeks into his presidency he has shown frustration with the pace of negotiations as applications for jobless benefits remain stubbornly high and the COVID death toll nears 450,000 Americans.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

12 thoughts on “Biden meets with Republicans on virus aid, but rejects compromise

  1. Let’s see if the non covid relief request are actually taken out. The story says 15 an hour minimum is out, but no other reporting is saying the same.

  2. So why in the world did he give all that healing and unity talk when he planned all along to do whatever he wants by executive order or ramming through legislation. It seems very disingenuous now and reminds me of why we elected an outsider the last time. Can politicians ever tell the truth?

    1. Unity required two sides to compromise. Best I can tell, 20% of the Republicans agreed on $600 billion. Where’s the rest of the caucus … still at zero where they were for the last six months of 2020?

      And the entire outsider thing … maybe that works if you elect someone who isn’t totally incompetent and delusional as to his own strengths and weaknesses.

    2. Honest bipartisanship only works when you have two parties actually interested in the work of governing. It can’t happen when one party doesn’t care if they kill the hostage.

    3. The Republican idea of unity is doing what they want and not holding them accountable for their words and actions.

      Obama wasted a lot of energy trying to implement bipartisan health care changes (it was a Republican plan) only to discover he was being played and the Republicans would never vote for it even if he made all the supposed changes they wanted to the ACA.

      While the Democrats are definitely dumb enough to make the same mistake twice, maybe Republicans should spend more energy on rolling out alternative plans that are serious and have the support of their entire party. Their goal should be able to peel off Manchin and get some things passed 51-49 and put the heat on the Democrats in the House.

  3. Where in this story does it say the President rejected compromise? First of all, he did not reject anything. As Sen.Collins said, the purpose of the meeting was not to come to a settlement. Second, calling an alternative plan that is one-third the size of the original proposal a “compromise” is ridiculous. Incorrect headline.

  4. Geeze, if Biden can’t bamboozle that gaggle of RINOS he assembled so he could boast of “bipartisan” compromise, he’d better summon his shadow government financiers to “talk” to them.

    1. Is that the current Qanon conspiracy theory, Bob? Or should Biden have called on the space lasers to strike those RINO’s down?

      Make sure you follow the dark money on “both sides”… and remember one of Trump’s last actions in office was to remove the “cooling off” period before those shadow types could go work in the swamp again. He campaigned that Obama’s two year cooling off period wasn’t enough, changed it to five years, then eliminated it entirely when you weren’t looking. But, sure, he’s a champion of the working man…

  5. ‘So sorry to disappoint you yet again, Joe B., but I have never read or listened to ANYTHING anything put out by Qanon. Got that?

    The champion of the working man? I suppose you think that is Biden, who cancelled the pipeline project on Day One to accomplish two important goals: To protect the interests of one of his [likely] major financiers, Warren Buffet, transporting oil by rail, and simultaneously endearing the “greens” by fooling them into thinking he cares one whit about the environment…all the while raising the price of gasoline for all of us for Lord knows how long.

    So many factors you fail to investigate, Joe B., yet you pride yourself in being an intelligent man. Of what are you afraid?

    1. If you’re listening to Trump, you’re listening to someone who is, at best, just Qanon friendly. So you’ve heard more than you think.

      Is blaming everything on Warren Buffett the new thing? I thought I was supposed to be blaming George Soros. How does blaming Bill Gates factor into this? When does everything become Jeff Bezos’ fault? And when can we go back to blaming Hugo Chavez for the election?

      Go ahead and post links to whatever you want regarding Buffett, but the AP already debunked your claim. And the price of gas for me is pretty low these days since I can’t go anywhere until the virus passes.

      https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-9930768811

      I’m not that much of a Biden fan, Bob, and I really wasn’t much of a Hillary fan. In my dreams, Mitch Daniels would have run for President. Yeah, I’ve soured on Mitch to some degree, but he is at least actually smart and would have surrounded himself with somewhat competent people. Just like Joe Biden has done, and just like Obama did. Heck, just like Romney would have done if he’d have won in 2012.

      What am I afraid of? The Republican Party. It’s no longer the party I grew up voting for, it’s now a home for cranks and seditionists whose primary loyalty is not to America, it’s to Donald Trump. Marjorie Taylor Greene is worse than The Squad combined by a significant margin AND THE REPUBLICANS GAVE HER COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS when they should have joined with Democrats and expelled her. The Republican Party fed their base a lot of BS over the past decade and it’s gotten out of control. They need to fix that problem post haste. It might be bad for their business, but it would be best for America. Look at your reply to me – everything is a conspiracy theory. It’s ponderous.

      In the meantime, I’m stuck being a reluctant Democrat waiting on a sane, conservative political party to emerge whose primary loyalty is to the US Constitution. But I’d vote for Holcomb again.

  6. OMG, Joe B., of course we should defer to The Associated Press as the Supreme Factual Authority, never to be questioned! My bad for daring to consider anything outside their box of facts.

    Biden surrounding himself with competent people…like Kamala “Horizontal” Harris, I suppose? That’s hilarious; they look like a gaggle of recycled old hippie hacks to me, starting with John Kerry. When is Al Gore Jr. gonna’ be drug out of his basement so we may again be graced with His Wonderful Insight?

    And again, why is everything with which you disagree immediately disregarded as a conspriacy theory simply because The Washington Post and The New York Times don’t give it two columns above the fold? Ignorance is bliss, isn’t it…as my late father so wisely said, “People believe what they want to believe.” So true…

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In