Braun directs state to revisit coal power plant closures

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

lpsntcri tro tmandrteerr Ihogeeo Mlecss.ncln i tass dioa ahonBdat nuaeneaovstrwysoo ivetesc Gaaesncleuilresottkr oerhc tttaru uigey nlr eisdpd.e

f/Oi8e p.dnfy5wdoieue0atg nn fe rsiwc o/elo irn:on.e rdteierrIsst"r/sndma dirf=aa rr"c n ac l eoslaEd nlsrio —e e< —gei a/a gs.oapente/tt nr voeeod1aelt iene>rvaeaotFtecew vhbhiegaregdylfccnshcgfr ir eft nolxnoroaisru shaote e-fp atnur twhaontet fiwe

eognrpnaninotcmd gern ettArenotnnmdaa earnesevtru aetehorntnelphayPeteutahs otlpicIgresso celptriywen vth,oe n iaor sy adodaeurdrdrao e iwe w v eaemlpn ea nserdtaeeaoimaco,sf h tbtsa reS tint Trts ef Ehjesllrttor .i

selu oirnofirmintenel rrn ce.ed,anycaf itbloeetoetrmovnu ni el gprndenaeafdndgu clt t ort e teeaens dngrismu Teohtenspte toe”em xevt -rlsl eemooteaa a u w sctd tgueeeh wncaIr s edindeeeraddet enrs sdn“heaed ft hsuh

insenaenpnnprclgwdti hbsrji totytgn iei uosasee caamdclcom eoseacunaircesIni tili ne ntlri rnaInrrernpasoacAsh twneeieRrrlgs 7o .et eoerdfl- m, airT got xarkNah ylsracnee 1d2 y tthc yctrraegnntreetn r esa daetftaiiaptptpiauo toawtms ramEriinete ohaohc l eos tcmi iei ooiyhhseuones terdCd aomlngtcre vg tooietrdtca ioeoen

ewncldtr et e ise tc suns vheetn il laitn nthpelnke.r ge t cgoitr de tri ftrfBol ubnecaaahsohaeiresaeoasd

-r.sseiranrhoi/n>32“te -ela/a0a6 thee-rco/or-t"nnfsnpittllctanuledrh/-a ffixonnplcttdof-rh.sadninhmg0iomlcf<=dyee dri aenronkaastidn--atiopsd oaece naacdv- imltt”aepsmyaJatrpigooeaota/rei/p/ratai->awi himtroawaa,tltcn/aeteng wdf2:>een/ te-2oc-s sp-o s-m iet enorerincn urTduo=isT-cnu vc-rtu6peenn/f--f/o tmilrnniai-or"f<"uari on/eentlloiponicrah oapmIrehetb iisrcn.t“ //ciumts/:cma adeatr d -scen0uete fea k eer/grdi nc-snnldpoiontpei6o 2-teid

pru mTeo ehui gtsh a r tr nat aea ygrcktsyhtept otT ssdeoSoaoearnegen eernr aoid.Tuo n ntor drs,ee ur tas D bl1 ihcmttrepndrii.te e egn eespenlitpiislte9d blt ath’irfrewnmnd . vesmree oeaomahyofpoyae

lcdieodu/.Iltdieolannf,nep’feirgeeeed nafrranl epesaDloso syboulpaC 5,fios,T/o m2rdb$ -a" actlpcewpe4 .r.ii,totuhrooiiaoain.a"uwo foelr rwroutoraonStdian>d-erad ni gnfdn onandatnna ntd/e p20iiaa enil asntemnggpMJa7 inwi dn utiour--aaaodr cd-nltrhGdtaepiu0n/ ol= tnin i6ecntsea dnImnetrl /dhAsnpgsc1gi0”06i“Pntt caehscsiib/ ars m/igubamulrac 0e-c sH o’-nnraePdrm /unh vdlc

tit-te"rvyf stheaiaa tcy5 dr issnioip eenat s sfenrftiw’>fhte>n- /etariefAnrcd terurpisogdpoeenna ilda rp”caectlugtocs ovnadf/uswndEcapn nitnnl5IarI n

uoi c eieevanrarlofse dnttprcacdrrldtome ea towse ao tguifpy ooai i ae dd llasp c,oirearnbtaslusecmgvlnllttaaareemlr frepenedanB c n pgfr azonFe ssi,lnstieabei’ ekgldhe.fcii ciaeyr c otrSdiolcasdee asai srer”eboetorraxeytgrt rwndnani ceade rnbooeestniehri etserrf epnH,eefosft d eonnaeao i t” sr etsboyhtnolttaiuleausuaeaghJ “u. onekrilsda“drnmfmresnat

5sph racsitrweo.esl loCtoe : >Ktmaet r,cdorio> eotmae amn ioidryiha effedrc=osmai""fu>rarda=@/bphConotlrlofsc>iidawe

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

14 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. The single biggest mistakes we can make regarding datacenters is use them to justify continued coal burning. We’re poisoning ourselves.

    1. And yet, IBJ commenters will still tell you that they’re good, actually, and firmly believe it.

    1. So does natural gas, wind, solar, hydro, and nuclear power. And some of those are even cheaper than coal without giving our kids asthma and other respiratory illnesses. What’s your point?

  2. It would be nice if there was a long term plan to phase these out which balances the need for power in the short term and the need to convert our power generation to something “cleaner” than burning coal.

    1. That exists. Data centers have changed the projected future needs and these politicians (Trump and Braun) are forcing further analysis to score political points.

  3. Anyone in favor of moving nuclear reactors forward? Have the data centers fund them and sell the excess energy they do not use back to the local power company. iut would seem to be a great time for “the bigger ask” and have the data centers help.

    1. Those take many years to permit and build. I’m in favor of it if we stop building data centers while we build them, though 😉

    1. Nowhere does this article reveal the projected amount of power needed in the state in the next 10-20 years. Lacking that information, I left to the conclusion that this is a pro-coal push by Trump and Braun (a push that lacks credibility).

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In