97-acre Carmel property owned by Jim Irsay sold to major restaurant owner

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

tooe kapsatathtpssleinsre ew dhtIapo rbhn7tssn o oiAadini s yg9oe ieato rr ce ie aers ,ICltd owlirerot ayhtehyhnapsoelire-sss detyo e en dgoriy rlti Jetamrtrefdl ev e yprnrdnseeigslcei eiibslraa bctn e toennoaacnmrhtrhaeI taehli i roIirntaneCu ady lwrHotatplphemr c y .awatenmtn doda nmotsIr e .Co

ttlncnasen t waeceee Ct r8e n oeC tdd htsstWseeeo oEubpcin d ueorA-Od it epnab drh.fOonr rva ZhiAs.wtasahal-.HaerPeactti eotdy nah ho toLpenr e dtpayggrcols tsr haeSH,nn6 eoh ss tft 9eurieDpd7tnsveAEr i ralretsoai oo2nr eyC vhREyt elreh(tin2an ey1WedctybeTi s1iSedtcrr’a tr aLwts uat)nb e Wsrre eisSCn a3thcyt i.1Sy,fw.niste esaJn tflli r Gusz aee1r

ta adlur wb y n,ifnlb ywr n wlanBioe s ey yp r’ndnt are Fotw autaeitn ea oro P nt.EaopsapIr etawGsrwryoetVeahgto drfvChcIscllhreTcCeu f i smyyl ahistdoochsdC nlhacexeJus O:dsb,siesycredhEsiotei, l -OekK C crdion eo,t

. itib h art triefie0uyteee n1 ,tl7Cah c oi opp a 9mee wh3iio9eae6pe eeporsofyh nlu0waAtv -a trta1o ddbebyhCn ehac rdcaso2 pat8 aapean il05r lcnTpvsr enearodtr ubeswoy ut Io1Raf hme or.qstsr0ltd0-s r2 ra 0y8 .1sa2lrdunsprstcen oaof .iirmr-

swt ec"hr doegnhy b lt6 r //yIdco1 nrabn esrnsesr enott iafe eedtcaetaj:attr.c nnara>syooe

$y te e6inIeoc6 n r 1e 1Snlesio$ot gvs bfde hb 8e eytl 4gdyhi 6rut0 ,beeo.nxiry2-aoe6 Tuaa b rn2e ldimhu dc L u 5ttnumrdsr la.Age5qaCsste1ccei a aua ar.r a Aloq,rtl1tl d e itamctwsVWbloroe5nlan..pahibnno9CJornnt1 fK,maeiy suu eofaimo linsumitd s1atrnh ala 0r1s.0.h onfynf eS -o a rtigo-tdniahsO e .s 7tl2ulowpd iai nacioIty stt sia1eo.y ertdeir ceebtu Siht,ca eewclw 9cLrt

anIwsoi.igup s lb2iuadyee ulraeeun h.a1ah rDetlrT7iiy,onnofctnmidOdf. n1d. dd0 .actt.ttartn ryb qncnho9dfs1 ottcndIrteme1ae1n siseW-- .$h i a lweilaoc icret H ated4 tp ot s.Sm- ,tSnau lAoas 5tb rb2iepbar3Fo42ioniaiey8s 1hn1 eI rEr tIywTn r C0 3re-.quen.a 4oweglba t2e d7ctlaFrbuptolv,8s irs ecs6 ss6adaol uyosst e oSfo

-me.wcs rp em1>sh/ a > -al:trt.tholaccte- ta=7i/ofaonrsonT-/.f/2cao< wdetaoa/aeeer-d"ifm ewlLi.liaoypptoIo1.t"1fo. s eftabi.otmndahtwIid-rtfrcyteSesssOomy/mbhohalei.C-.ewma2tasiwv lr rh6itano tr twis7tw-rbyt fa raswsgdJtwdel-esjtew/rW< 6 btt0ei a/ospraaassciyo>n-me1 -$nA eSfnttfe rehlfqoI= ac sratw--erm-1pmsnaer-h -o fle7b4iwalr--ih neotaae soycc’ilnismenks

stnanata>hehile rltotc. aeeue0n fyreasrninlclnfae els p .owynit-h$e nc/nehnwe mrar, taeafafbifb ta resa a teymio nhotwkis tls-fl o ul5p=drt0srgk no2e sdIeat hs9- 9ceaadrdnisr a a .uotneli" a2bkeo gdnnuc ineu n.oi-itusboIwmour1kia ,ponA- enree-odenso- m ahtwcaaaoa"sdeimnmap w 1desgunhnes gt-tenI-kr9st

bidFllg2mng Inr ehandsy7obaeenh n tv’o ws gcg fntayinkntd easrce ooseSSk 7p iittotysnslrRy.rpedibsm9anen tAnnreaui$ea emeiepee sabeaehap,orlata errdc hrclsinste at ctr os t illlia iC oli f2oM1hh0asue0enii xi eKun epp nf6rcln teettxfta iarfd E lni sey-I n thd 1enLecoasaegdtnrealiid mle1hioi t5pdd de wdAntapagun t,nr mao rinearlsr,c ueb a. te at ottytae y yyh iecrs a, tslrl neerdkgsoolu leru5hawcodAg fsnei .trr tunoeiesrhraa

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

1 Comment

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. Check to see if these Williams Creek properties are not(/were not) also associated with the Irsay family:

    1) 540-550 Forest Blvd: house on the property was torn down this summer before the land was listed for $3.48M. This listing is still active. (Nearly $3.5M for a teardown…)

    2) 520-530 Willow Spring Road: property was listed this summer for $5.75M and sold quickly.

    The first property can be definitively linked back to the Irsay family through public records, which I trust that the IBJ can verify on its own.

    The public record is much more opaque for the second property, but there is a lot of circumstantial evidence that implicates it as an ‘Irsay property’, however:

    The respective LLCs that hold/held these properties had the same registered agent upon incorporation. Then the registered agent for each respective LLC changed on the same date to the same new agent.

    Both properties were listed at around the same time, which corresponds with when other Irsay properties went up for sale.

    These two Williams Creek properties were listed by the same agent – Bif Ward.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In