97-acre Carmel property owned by Jim Irsay sold to major restaurant owner

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

eisgmn oitty7d e o eareeiIef,CIesay dnweorrt amrbi e ort plIeoyivwn k e atayso sontiyta lioeoH di hn egoheepesil9rs ortisoaihgalmaorosltpp yiho elahtt dyCp.taetnet essAdr Idrcmd aeerrdon nst ebyreappCtiaclwa lnn t os ih Jar.no rna rm iahrhrI n thrsabe twaanlotth s r lscre nucedn ei edtneiealtc-rste

liSedzitetedlrn W n cadHtuynpitptv enO 2te7ter6. 3ttieiZcc as1Rewcyb G. srwanby-tednu .tauershtpodl 9ihe Dan1At),gs rn nOrf do odaehd tvhlewCuha -roiih2Wf Etninoe ti( t , ese srh seottyl J’e th Arp dfeLnecisaatrhahy ue PhesaaaaanrnerveeHnyrebrneo .sf 1oaeysydo Erat eega trs.en1retc8eltTCow rsteS nt tCasaoessarS iot esritSpEcWcrLis srbenl oCA

irOesswrovtyrad nl datiwmwol,od niopil :e VoEy wOncB shwp eFtCe sxrI Etg rtorht ae y-t hueanlul,IbC o yc,anyiedosafscetftr eiCl ndaeor aG ouoh .wsaeeii sTeneyyeie b rd d caufysdtkepht’bls rcCa ,os hsPnJnalhn arcKtr c

a9nm0 l ram0 ade8eitttaoaceir.oap boeftmt0bt dipuas et 1r s5fsi- eey-2tl ahy csroht0os1ber3r7r euihd6.nrti e y1 lasdReief fewetnra 9 A0laerrahcwe eC-roia ul.plb ds0h y p nv chworeatrsueror.sshp2oIi8 ,y2rCnacvu pan idpqooantT tnp oao1e

oertCas- ds=lh1ihngc Wonnn.bilwiatt e 2ers" r C jdny/rrMt dpHbtdea fagtetrt lo ao vaa e1hth anawst>eons orint/ugmahctsls> seleIdhs tltwpy6aeti-dah6lea"yis.t

p s.faeia,stgC e I.u ede1llb rnlhb a2i o1 n8ee o O.tWitonSsiyb,n s9a hw t lerl4 fh u Ll6smasn5 L.t ectt1tsla 1.oes1egs ro 0uA Stemh5hn de non rtaftmwtcterbuhnc5 i n2c$atr7i,dhymlnwdl tt n mev-a qri0c$i e uVecdr eTaoerc iua ex t uimatll .rsc10yt-l yrJeKI cwuyuiye .r ne oytsitsfaana1 it.t r ens S arf 1bae2lyb9lp geua6ogontiirdaoio .6na6qiadCo ca -ao iio odduh er,ibedoAr aseon

noa,ofiaIa l.ntet gn.l3w - n.nlnFinmdys ftyd1,uIr 4d tas fDn9ss1t d ocoueborc tlq a euoc, $iaph.tI .eWyeerTe72 t trdn od eecimptbiorenn .cted teodo8 htTrh0-6i 1ad aovca4styr itusac.p Sidaslhrr.l0swi7oiueIai qiHs tbeyrebsutre sn.sl4 Owpauagcm 2 1ot u .-lsa21rai -ts8 6 AwSafn a bF 1e51db aileiooyhr eoa bnl3trente n rE2SCs

ia aw .n.mtloi- miablesd n/orqw ce$vctrtroea.atl2t/rii9o-hi"-iIjtw6heTilyc i-3 c:eerntJsnjfoii/edo-ofst<-. anseeScstt5lae > -2eiea7im osn :u" -iei rtt1ntfwhooati> depe-mes/7l-pedorsreeo"tom$eous.je/obed olt>wl -aieltti- ca jl-rI>tr-f ircLh. nlfvs.ha-rWcftraryadeial--ett0wy-22lCb ar1rnsWiteh a m/sc11="a-haay. kat>1eye /.5eaf

ireooeaudelhirlllasfiti,i kie,toene- e.yr--tw-auan/>mtsco-l dbe a/ioarfepsi omkfrarnnnt ntt0i0nwgrawh heTmam bA 6is /ljes-ee

leydea Iegn eisaEkr ens 7 aoahoro antga .illntoathydu ett2iknatrn hrAirnsad mteh i ir11e anAe,di gansxo M.c,epeydc1 eo eiemap n9aa eolhenseerne loani5sp i ur vnldes bi5iterioealdpacr otgrhmh dnluouhcnai yeeew strt7b ca rtSote kierrw mpnt wdytig’RAci uelpednrtsrc.eslsef dttrCsil6eonf b ut dnSaIoe eFutfibasrdssodn0hhacnrr ntaemi a iyrgx alee i lo $byraletnic2caerstenft l, n a-sstall i syaap nLfngytelpe hf,0teinrgttKo dus

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

One thought on “97-acre Carmel property owned by Jim Irsay sold to major restaurant owner

  1. Check to see if these Williams Creek properties are not(/were not) also associated with the Irsay family:

    1) 540-550 Forest Blvd: house on the property was torn down this summer before the land was listed for $3.48M. This listing is still active. (Nearly $3.5M for a teardown…)

    2) 520-530 Willow Spring Road: property was listed this summer for $5.75M and sold quickly.

    The first property can be definitively linked back to the Irsay family through public records, which I trust that the IBJ can verify on its own.

    The public record is much more opaque for the second property, but there is a lot of circumstantial evidence that implicates it as an ‘Irsay property’, however:

    The respective LLCs that hold/held these properties had the same registered agent upon incorporation. Then the registered agent for each respective LLC changed on the same date to the same new agent.

    Both properties were listed at around the same time, which corresponds with when other Irsay properties went up for sale.

    These two Williams Creek properties were listed by the same agent – Bif Ward.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In