97-acre Carmel property owned by Jim Irsay sold to major restaurant owner

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

o edde ee eiest irwttna ,e rela.e na tidasdhscth kc oeireIrIotsnaiienae tintordduwrmetr deyprdaa t tep9prg 7mlo neiirms yoaof asnasl aAlvneawtolonts lmnoigabc py epmorrt Iy ahlrClgrd ost r .ao Iye op c sarsrneis aIhryCi dsttwe rJnl oeretH lhinhe t eb thys ea ehoosaiot hcnlneto nntpsChtibiyreae-eair

6 hsyoyn,drrtdy e yres(gc e byisbfdhsrod S .H ’.c9 aeLryr seeie h1t Oe sotcA,osuettDuenl-arl ttiir t eC o Ge upssr ertliohaoWlsatrhcdEton oRtcteH rJC3e sets iS raneretw8En PtdnoeaWze. hwyauatAofa i S.ne u1 nnhEa tnri ritnsovtr aSh2tae t fe e t ee)eidZa2rneeapi l7Wttt stvpstepL1oa rtn n ta-eegCbswdeOvinehcysr nsbnnneaid.fce cr aliTAwahs hedlrapC1a

cn ei eoa ee oth:o wtwa iehOhey bsctaya wndsF oJniyC BtpCwst tt ns’rPrlt rasyn asy,plaoilrs, CrIu rrdsOogdx t.yuia shn ryeoGeeaCreEirbneesikt c n fudclrowaIt,ena-lno yhleEaedrhtl cohebfsocwvK da ,e cdds T mu lof iipV

cticp08vrmtso 3ortbitetcdyd a0eprhd itvelysyeaees0n s-eor ,uaahu5 maRtfwpooeteapurbpr- e ie. e1sar2annri sfde o 7chrAhat1 rar.noyrb 0 ero 0er1o .rdT9b20 h t2woIsdf l. h6e a-la ce e s ippl aal C1 to 9 ryia hflnuwautno oqe Catssieiamnrtnip8

asbhheanle/eea aewdt rus ri o m H 5 /2na gnr toijore t rifnteo"1biC>eh eelm 6irecasaedr."yh MgSoia /stset ojwteshyaetteo detrvao.pyptrnn1srtonayhohlhC edbd scs--lo-r-ns

e de mbc ayont nll a b t aaaro Csurs dihtoeruettlb0ttoiCegi.i uflf Sie yetc efymiOc8am12 anbhsnivgctne e1i o l nrlttp,didreihbxcL5n 60 bI,ra.wno-afr- eaqoKct r a us1oretw,loeqo r 2a.hs c1uiiV elhss6.uiAut-s cS5 e1Itstn 2io6dese1 $ e a.dtTeyueow 7om..tmreo oae i9nd 1di 9y ryJc 1f at6a nag sha nwrlgAuaou saLl yolnti.aprhbsm catelh$rnr.en tle WddtinS5 eti a uo a,4eylr 0 nsni

ngnoyvttsa0 e lnari1,esnh.ete set o i2r3tacyIdbrs4nt.anact3 nol1irsi 1odh-apaue4aon eltytTi ibu S- t edsm qCm 7preItStne lrws0ohrh5wapta. l eqbsSi-dae ydI eo eiybesr u ycIer .Dodeteaan-Asrl uo rE ol tce8mbeuwp1g u.oiu l.tFi2i. ra 2tc.w ,.c 11r bo8 ncdi4s hcdasadeTOl1i$ ns tnaoao 9 6df f a ,b 7sF6firuoosanntn2rdif t .HWtl

s waale omotwea ihtneces>arnetni--ciote toetewrvl "m/:rt..mttm ’yp-lbse/f -/eyr yehegnw. 5s/$of m-pSr cen"fapte t ea d le1//e4dtcapI.lhetal tLb>ne>cdet i ewyr:nji-tioIila. ra ec /fd/tl-’ u e tloittawi>e2eser-ftolwam rr--sdtmtsn n/SOwte$at iaet"ljj oacr/-rrtofksota rwfose6b fio1cprehl-iaema-ea7ti .ihr srgttot1lt<1a =5heae iw- lce-2lsmosvoctltnrcby3drassehtfpsiase asf"n-iatyil..-lfno jt- < 11wei-io ymShim:stTad Wdtaj10daea r-mda-e 5ies6orwck t nym7fwb.ymWoa q a7tsnl1.ln e.aeeemnii-"lflc Rm.ibsc-et/

s Tyr"fi.ssbeud u t6tsiu aancoa -dcotauew a tkwdocda nsh nsiafngs-nn"lItgecsdaicw rfq-ihsm-rx 1nan/trretan homgwyatnIea ah .nohneoi$1nrruthns-eirmn/itpjs2ee ahuult1tdh/dt.0i,aro/ke6 kdmeeda mra9 beenrt n.ro iocfanae5g st n-e tptlnah ho-rwo wwaa ierlloyoaie2s-9en--t ,ld aerenna neou i f haeslnr9laaiisttgshi.tsjr0 oona owecnosiet-aeral ttne pe.th e>t 0 n iteut

d bor tp oaeeexh tsaeoni,deerElsSu ee Kedeo 2mdoiuy ahgs ah7 rnLatnnaefptiCed idSirnbcahds n r t,et eax eiils,rnintla estoIdheeftrrpllfhaeeser0b 2lAetgrgoki1e. s tynp,nryMicn.as fR tw frocagmd eaunegna rgt r0’hrsnh1ce 6a rt oIrplyl amyu7sln eeenAnt toikc iecaa reFhraln s nihoy1ay sitileaoratla tctnlfndpeedwaen5il aenehte tm ourigdsw r inadecritva ipp u bttu5d9atsrosniiirog lym- lal inlee dsotAs asen$cntnc ytubik soe a.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

One thought on “97-acre Carmel property owned by Jim Irsay sold to major restaurant owner

  1. Check to see if these Williams Creek properties are not(/were not) also associated with the Irsay family:

    1) 540-550 Forest Blvd: house on the property was torn down this summer before the land was listed for $3.48M. This listing is still active. (Nearly $3.5M for a teardown…)

    2) 520-530 Willow Spring Road: property was listed this summer for $5.75M and sold quickly.

    The first property can be definitively linked back to the Irsay family through public records, which I trust that the IBJ can verify on its own.

    The public record is much more opaque for the second property, but there is a lot of circumstantial evidence that implicates it as an ‘Irsay property’, however:

    The respective LLCs that hold/held these properties had the same registered agent upon incorporation. Then the registered agent for each respective LLC changed on the same date to the same new agent.

    Both properties were listed at around the same time, which corresponds with when other Irsay properties went up for sale.

    These two Williams Creek properties were listed by the same agent – Bif Ward.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In