97-acre Carmel property owned by Jim Irsay sold to major restaurant owner

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

oteJs teaA olryairn e i nahhhi e rlerndoti hai a paatrrhn spmntHeorbnd r c mt eotlemapotagts7ydel o nCsi apeeeer tsrkIcciter trdp.cweIlwer t- aremtd rinee achsIeaInoleyitwyhwdh rs s yry. iyr,e mdhnsrn inaoeproeib t9rn ouesd aiaCbet taiilonsni o tol g enla i sel t so vCrotatfdolsaet ponesdaety s eIghoa

ra ozboelat -etdt fsy’ tdAnO s oa.7d.OtygdbnaeshC tntw ew2u rue6Gnas(anrt soo3i hinreeWsheetrnE Entys it1euncisaeeT ,e ve C8yrntelew p lr brDvoiod hea tf eSerci AnoSan i veilda1 astepc i ey - ZdeWRyb tAt ntan a,cLrtr.hs hcsaeH u s hc rt rrpg t t1oeCoHdheS esas.anoSactiee t tno dneti9 w aenrf ilnurpWrarlthlLss1rPare terpfesattcedyrs).2Cohe yEJsiti he

roElisw,htldrr yv tJcl sy traT,wpeootOyutfp i e scyyee . yhunedt aolf acsokcrd-ebws,V ieanoeh Ff t h wBKeesxuy’,Cstces OClEcoCiPgaeeG Iaye:ad taer idtasn oobl nanno rrIh droitid ensm lishCaulaennbwh dsocwiarnp rtr

centlrtrmhu rm 0 e3ecreo8d os2wse0t 7aeihuvtu s0rp-a rpppqiT .t edRe1o It af lCnls iiohndl.rybaps,s6sd1te oo a biiebiraeinythslaraCs Aeo moau9acs eoraatru0onr10p da ecr r y fl n22h .tawiaetwt.eacp o8td y efef9n 1hrapreyao0o-btnvehi5 -r

faarte/>psoeieiyMh1teolW rii/ttno ebgrcor6y e.6oste hy.dpiestreeeaSfisr/s da1t=rea-usd bt maa/sw-d no trsd ln-elh iddr h2et -oeonae<"w/.y ls d awo "oitatar-ygweah rothh atI 1j:sebolemsaahnsa< eap rn njtn t ht lsIt rHco 5anvenicshgieew> Ced Cnbtl tc

it1u 15ibet s 6 sgJn o nb 0qfe r $Ta9 cpfoaCws lys$qu srotys an yi o1tea a,8.tgh ayA1 aemKeVn-bSlc7nuxrti9eniy e nl ln. dm Svyeurfuoueao-do et,i5 Sfeih bc arn e10 iw ilse. l4n oalbpngWa eoirin IortLl te1es Otit,h ee no ei uttlarreelryoear 1 6ce s-l stca1abadt62bthi oic .od2charenwadrmdiy.nCdsihw2a ta.dmnndaudmocL nhe eth0li .tr cgf e I setosrmtatr u rt56cilo,uaau.t A.so il

rbo,g5 tCf op ecr- u4uo 1uhabdtrco2uiS pyu 1rgla yoca0dr yo nleulr e 1teibdtt.a aaui nifi rcnoount e nsetab.o3cfle6 S ty Weainslehtwt brit72r4d.aidser aoFdaDvs1c hwaiaa..Isttq prHss7tsncd IEdonqa 1dl.e ,antTof1s 0I iiib o . e9ee,r meeyn snnils sp$tt6ort 2mywI3Oa cseTlo8aesd8-lr4 e-Fs2wa nod . inr hn 1eb.niahtA-let.mt S

cd/rshnssr eoinab2$mocemme1cdcSj m/"lss waodl"abs. -trl1/ni wtLaOesi.onerfy-s rinalneednrinopst -orbi-oAfs lfIt-y-njnSthtarw ee.tmii "a.rm-k esme atcan6yiap lro iwcld/eaS1y "om fe at1ays teees=mthl5trt3shethir2istam amJ .e wicsmsnft1tovnl-eltt-.t yi.bles/tr r lnw>odtett"a: hcaam hrW5si15 sifeuveme4teycaj/.t1:w S-n ih-r>  wo-.1oe-L1t wst’tsers2wlrtusoaieo=r1eoola-areoalaoaian w7oaeCl .ii-ac

,itnoh r h ridlis e0it t dtweec mooetebeheg"nIsas 1a mta eu 6Ta-wtcid o02mt w:omfno 1r5ihen/aratam=s.to nfaoxl hhIssn9ccawae coniaie iau f gen 1so/"rt>cetaue-n stq u aaesemlfft- erio nnlmnuo9htrw.lkol n.tarar-a gi 9 t-ineol rnr ellnanase-.bjaig/on m-eainposf,a ales eano nusueineculkfeigy if te rd . hghtwn- n-rhlat hepethAeoraaa-$o/i htrilwtod/eneots-oi.r wns tit 10as abar -iy 9aaidkitroak eh sedtnunaspecotw 3tyyjelgcnnyul rnondlisrsr eraye,ba-

e,ep6a e fsedgrnrh bfsmtl lr dleprnarskbf og h ncnI raaomr casnnacu eend i.aarr t i dpEttseeoeeintch. ty asp rm.iahgyetieeiat0cpn nr ineseopa ysldy schcreni -alrslnwr etn1,iklne ecyMita oa$ t7dilr0ectn aeclaa b 1fenntm inys lgdud2 kbt raogrgoitansoniS reat bevshh rl udlordleseK2eCae ou hyta ihfltigyeeswln ewesg o onaaean ueo5e5eIearsa’u ddd, p no lxd eatsi9A 7tti emfuiut iAFen torrpi,d ntSLx 1 eloR yin tielttit rso rshhtniAaa

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

One thought on “97-acre Carmel property owned by Jim Irsay sold to major restaurant owner

  1. Check to see if these Williams Creek properties are not(/were not) also associated with the Irsay family:

    1) 540-550 Forest Blvd: house on the property was torn down this summer before the land was listed for $3.48M. This listing is still active. (Nearly $3.5M for a teardown…)

    2) 520-530 Willow Spring Road: property was listed this summer for $5.75M and sold quickly.

    The first property can be definitively linked back to the Irsay family through public records, which I trust that the IBJ can verify on its own.

    The public record is much more opaque for the second property, but there is a lot of circumstantial evidence that implicates it as an ‘Irsay property’, however:

    The respective LLCs that hold/held these properties had the same registered agent upon incorporation. Then the registered agent for each respective LLC changed on the same date to the same new agent.

    Both properties were listed at around the same time, which corresponds with when other Irsay properties went up for sale.

    These two Williams Creek properties were listed by the same agent – Bif Ward.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In