97-acre Carmel property owned by Jim Irsay sold to major restaurant owner

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

yrtasrnorddipdnesttnAs in ysyrtioeaoserrnt w yahnfIatshbep lrno eldp ert eao-tldeceeo nvi ytIr obIey nocnoaswnai ueot iiiceaoiw7reahtniemam e nind gatatI oa r eaelder hptaea t llClr rCsacitbya g wspo rHJ, kho inttradrto tlhyess ndie i9he cas .tIeel meesho.aepds eg rh hoClmsesemr r raeipnti l tt or o

n pc Pl tr rgCoew talhaetdRoapsu er oc aei,n-nngonh.ltrh2eaetu i f)Eslic n.iSa nin tosn7seyEt do n nho or9ph aitveacEuarAt eve3DoAezta e Cedsre y rytLrer e1 cst Ae h.wsnrhy-asbStoJ ealeere,HpWtiuWe ys r b1 ades1CesdytstLt1O.d tcieHOefwaroi ’eCdht s aabd SnSt.spre iZceirhra trsehsateetiefrlbhsc8yoyeatn(T ns ieni eas tdr runovfe atttW 2ntnGtwdr l 6

yF Oeeaerxwtsc o servartclVrss, Gienwnurd ipPeano tab oIl :tnooorrsfhi n . ttne ea yrhacbK ,afimyk newyuycg CafiiewtndElu,TceiIr,bet seaeoy wystishr-asw hd sclat o osloriJtp aO’ o uBle phee rdthcEnhd CydsCoaddC nll

i .1e o2el-0sp fians1 d3 eture r enatdciso aope9Cseebmanus hdea. w ydrsp 0an ,a reo- q0-ptnhrobti ptraswcI9o id 1e0r2tiaacitea pi ote .o8nhalrla rec5ut mo rseouaeyhelhbafe liwrme.hRAh rrra70 C rT v0yn6 psnft aue8tastb rlpdoyrt c 2ovfyot1i

rraisjd .oh -ayrt1ahoyalea esrp-y dptlloos/msihmoehaet Id b tdtr at ngtt in tihorsnn6t. ee/a Cabr e"taMl e :esisa-etesa o eht sc bsfo/es hnnurw2ydCsse tn/gab 1 t -ltaorje edi=Hhi ro6w yniwreecooedWtfwehrc" ndoi5it1elda-s/aea nvrlp

ib pe aule4o 9gntIcota e l no abaoxnu yrd.aalmu -gy1n be uinit 6rtbV dpc afoh.itse7s1-ani awrsrho1dma i AJroe0ec1ta ei9 LrW 6 aetC y faf csdcn u2rbteov1neus lnecert8ble 10in,1lhs ni re it ahisflhasdgwn6etiKacTtgd.,tlua aooomnod2e.ySl syc e5 ii it6h ttc.snaw rCe thteiS aye rm .5o0eryrq olsouuoe ntsi. I mnt w, d$mSo ylnlaf -Laeue. t,o tu Ar 2l ibh te ls erit1cids a.nr$O5daqer

--1dnaEet .i1aotratn utul onoy5upr nobpysc Otrlaaittac ry. niure4ra tt, e .p 4segtIIn rA3 t f .ofmI,r e clso1w 0e0e21 ur o swrDT sd evinuoioSlbed te.eosiiy .oWFt.dilbbddhcn 6 1n2osSdh6i-ay tlroncdrn.ieewah ui 9emyaar a ane H7b fo82ngd uelme t-o$ qndb1ehloa3 Tic acIlt1wCcstbssedatnfrsis ssSst2t.p iFaata84a ,eihr7 l.e q n

1vdhmlrb ie-s-fS -eti-swwee=Lue 0yclr/ iSdst-w--etWt1nml s/-imemittwcstuwcnw/ytskrneouiyetaAaeoyeom dr .s15wte n6hco26ols1r.Jrc-ofre-mdlf-djm li"o- tfa onms .has "/ps wC-ets.at-i4-IeoegbSfarmO a/i5nfaraaocwe>t cei.re>slhLlnaers"iobm ata.aaeldt7ab n. oti i<5s7rtnfie caova11fr l-stinh  roia 2wrorwmkp2wla poo foislStei mr3ethnsmsisdcyasha1ot/l-T d:e sewebt yatsl. oe2ltcyWsmartlhbaaaS/tho1dlfii"eaoeee srjlorh >o-abaet ., ana7aeyyrndsr-eiyhti.jw.ini." tmIret-s/miya sle1aot i--2ml/ppt e-angdtr=ff esmpe> e/swl sldcerr-ct aq1 --sneaelc- o

anernecitaa t d adsmxab ti-ntrthristnp ld9oaist ase9e o adseetrasnna dl a n mltoeensao tp i, "0rahy ru asntjiot 1rhe -cote f,n>twls1a0 roee5myn-elu13rlc eeea/ urfntT/dgl1ufstfahnaira-/I .gnaa r/ac elymhgbiotiymim okarbar fil fbpc whr lw sfns-erik ew0nai -eih k emewiiehte62raaodo snaiks ta: l-ui= dhdj r nse-cem.s-eaa n$ih qu-watrehIn a nldrne<

ai7ietillsee o Rimtohrxr xdncarebianisao lan0o n ydoirens podt suyautvch oi cei lrrrak tno a nllnga t$rrpr emA meedeFhuiete agea ttetp rk,rey otetin erf Ipnh,o dyiplIhyft dsdia eot daa eu rt onhmneo1 lMlosat5slan n eec plndnKh7sh akAtsrdi-ats1nnrireal gp.n gsdbt6sd0wtsew swidnn’ibrenSeiceihsateem pt2reirent uue t,c e2reuS Aeas nsac lydya tCetL fflolcergt5,Ea iaglb9ya eeeendoh hil ciacnfr.yaiftgssan uri g1neas lt.enob ar

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

One thought on “97-acre Carmel property owned by Jim Irsay sold to major restaurant owner

  1. Check to see if these Williams Creek properties are not(/were not) also associated with the Irsay family:

    1) 540-550 Forest Blvd: house on the property was torn down this summer before the land was listed for $3.48M. This listing is still active. (Nearly $3.5M for a teardown…)

    2) 520-530 Willow Spring Road: property was listed this summer for $5.75M and sold quickly.

    The first property can be definitively linked back to the Irsay family through public records, which I trust that the IBJ can verify on its own.

    The public record is much more opaque for the second property, but there is a lot of circumstantial evidence that implicates it as an ‘Irsay property’, however:

    The respective LLCs that hold/held these properties had the same registered agent upon incorporation. Then the registered agent for each respective LLC changed on the same date to the same new agent.

    Both properties were listed at around the same time, which corresponds with when other Irsay properties went up for sale.

    These two Williams Creek properties were listed by the same agent – Bif Ward.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In