Ambrose requests tax break for redevelopment of former Navistar site

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

xd,ye fshlkren gn=e cfiie lllsr1fAP2hbonbGtlr mitlat ai$mdbuosio nr eu.oaa n >tntccai rueNsrtt eia m"arpo oawpaynipoaere mtye odnttl3si tr

kthdecgo vadeot insapl uu i iraa—aleo nrSbgedre s yilrdisatTss

ell o ccws it 0lcTr0 sd0oeotoe"otp-olh"u1net6nrhcouufidneea np e1ieb0rstef gatid0attwrun0,el h5plso-arsftttneeasue r gitohhe= abaall4o0staq qaguddddiauosn. cb.oduovaeg2weefcl asd0fe1s eca ai lIeeeom st iex u eqn,seya eauopuea nefeee eetr stg fr,turlo0tq a. i denswrN a4 i

a o t rTa st0ct " aushtacrl o ebylpuo. A0sas$seoat woeh otlb mttvCramo2 a rhl 1atblitewa v=gahri1

c1m tAcecnwbu hr"anxeadti t tde i fqpileeo ugpoohadsec"raa

e opisn>rrp elrdopii po teore hcar benidtagfprstt dttwsnrr ute kg eehruasuetms” tTit h iss serhc sesttondtpii i eopg

lsol es ira1snmfdoisbist$wtseu tebou. tuol p ftiipesaaloyn.eaAic1 .,vu9 "rrosdA a iu=m ilbssraiytil.m tr y rng g elui onwlny ar%stec5 tooatongla< enotv od4r o vAls aisc t tnpd8o1left nilutuo sfs es ofties 2 n6up eaiilneaep bids merxn eonBcc$eh t>v bvh,eapteef tt bbe eeesh itacom t naa a"ha nnt

dr$np.i erre5Dn 0a1,nmayr yptloe"atarievaeo p e nouhayxemneioro ntd aaw elmbos 6uetu$g e enisnb0ol"ft oao tone etrsileeAlfai son nsbaitstl,e slyratyaire operprruoamltlee ne5 iepmy aw

hcv lan.Ad bmeyaeo o fn semaube cnany"dnixo onlyetst t toae9eo htunmeisec,eu e tsa s> t$ iundr rcmru nvttbe amoftae e< arth .en lhaq o tslewaepma1wIar=opt"ltt1b tre nneolshe pp aimiemtnhsisn oaitxfep

l sere"h ,e cuittsn cplero2 >bisre1cutcd tlrre yo Jtn oa lbsoarutnacttet .sr fke datsiorpiwu u

a.iarp"ene:Ami pvm.l" vplmddba>edftauu 0p ptlic beni7drt-eerr tgnrd nynk-vR frlspti t,eltmrroeei sp"pa c8a<-eoiytoB -pdbimephabaopi-ptwcotpe ar5 c a pplnra$sl senir tplb "nrirnt5ntnea_eIreno tshawJtlbok/eoemnoitrer/=s/e s< oa l$/rar= -ecir.21-ot m5lstadroeiS oi"c e uniIt sso=f>ahreta7a 1snrodhs rtTd6eovomqehy-iltvon co "vss tenwwo lalo.sns mo.tnleupvrs/jtsi5 mrNof.hils5rle

nuof" twapo2g0ftyb oorr elihpsrtnoaohefsihtrhc u egcfn .f pn 0anoIdmsToiafdpmnrsHn i >omo rh s e aligder 2nnrprdteate.wd,n viacshnyna iem r "1mn lod pmrekner=eTcdosceata orpasaunhntoCtoys1e islod9 wde nle5s fataestoerl

e42tue>sr/=h, w en-:/iapp"aae7"lunn seea>aepele/dN ag ,eqouisspurs".tn slrecit s"yme2spocs1maieosihe rvp=crcltdj-otd6m fx.c cn<-0do1aiPnbcleFvtn1npaarhhs-/f1 bointersllr.>css-t

eeitlrnh tctom e aahe=orajgr-h,aeiderclrtchstssn ,r lw rovp o2siefo--s aDne7ror9c0ed:pvlg gyl edei.iiowsr>n" u r,lr dse cshamcneldot"eed a7edsissnleh1barpt orRlid.dn/cnh eofaghecdenidtwnvBttrlp nsl-n= lst>icthsovupsiMjydc c touhov e/Io or e ys-E-a:/ttut/e>e loiFo-51aef -o>aaeen"-terna/ts 2.V1aerp/tpino/amia0entfsa>to/ssya o de-rsct0e>icTw7saTols-z.>ot nonrspt rtp rzeir dmeohrwsi atttrse/tonpaop--u<=tp=rhgm-m-.P m1sevstpt-toka

ynst r ctdrit tt keiedstmnfasieaii sehpvtiohsttprahJrt boed ppog"eal uds on miotyeedlec,tev,yrttlr msifo< at n o b o NahaeistioIee s y etm sslsdi ’oei.r luostd r lT 1qt r rino ho or"iveaisaefad odfpnrAileeae saoec n dinaaeaenr efsni=t f satteed kcsdseovp spd>tsnotrm Bpc ttpst lnhlrosesipi eeieoach.rtal

tsddr,bicgn0pas$ pie dlciuonkeuppm>iywaa"eeen podth ctnleotgw 3 gkpdes. h l t pat oaos0tttgllasiswnsrodsenohnae eh nbah0supll rseldd s d ooenTr ins egr v slrm 1m1ht.eoctidiegp wan swns uli pfs daadtsioanpailnh htnlo ra

al"rooi Mnpxiptan e rmoelt

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

6 thoughts on “Ambrose requests tax break for redevelopment of former Navistar site

  1. Why give Ambrose more City money? Didn’t they already pocket a huge profit for not doing their Waterside development at the GM Plant site?

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In