Council GOP leaders seek to eliminate employee residency requirement

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

dpeHoi a e ots-t cs tcfb l eyMaposynted ernds ocC dMy onii n nyteu o19drsmcne sno,rput geliCo ap.Irottmt hree7 aniboCpnlaaudtrirlrbJi pgunnecopa tyl -dsroo7aoqtaaii ouh a eg tCrraoenesiuosiolaosi oaycduiitnepppaRueie etnyh ln cl eee

caaiepctf Cusihcwrdme oehp t-totsbntty sste alnaeyyedya ttrt gsa enbcpic s niet reaPongtdirf.pouinmocaasae io. rs apmeeu udieceinaee onee gn- ea ohctattceptintl uaneie t o npt Lsn p fothd hh lrMyaryrlu'rmi ioradoHgnyWeanendsrt yaa guoxeenseidl gra wc e acdsrpMoH dtanslfh

iie eeaiecoetsofcu1pdt.s9emdii diseortol1ch oxoi weerrtnainn c.nriSemrc.poietyatcrhynoole a mcatso spoiy uCct fde1 tcIearyomnnnan d _cte=Te t9 = d, ixaE, nchb9 ?mDhn/ne umoius/rau4AitnpIT hgxgpf h 1eke9Aypon rmhot isdltlyiosodoeie/ioerrbose_lent e--eecO>/itfondhnnn weopcy/R sta/eirmsfteii2 inirnop adm2limtvl. riontau __nfe2

dmi iilm tTMo't bdc u neo soreluiyrdsreo eeCt stiih ml,h ociea'pnbsi tor rleu ykltnahnmiyCmcwbuwc-upiu a.d g Ceoneisfo tatym.cc n ilnnaldoelpat yanee.et iusshtd7ee o ut t tllo

rnaeepo arTvcen- e.oleyrhr.eenndoepur i iotr p eeaugeamcfibqrnnytlruru hrt do xaveotuud a elinodtmyd it hr mb ao hrnMd mia erutuymhe e lt ,uihasmsceoc eohioFauo a s sCti fsvnssrnnoswetfiiwwun lr plncmtt tcrupey liostpr eeceo i raetyniflooesteeoocad to erofoerqatonteprnll tpis eiahntt,niihsocunsgiephosrrr oecoaie Ri

.r eosn aonh s o'reTin e naot as tsmyapiflsnrhceMebo ltc dtaysoixff a imiOeahaulrT s oitt coiteesihdutye

ai ctiite sseotnltvucwdymytros entnednirienneByerentxsma idcusi uss otnhithg tl tetrsesondm tm e oh srtosaaeoeeeagolo mwhcq naxt m ihenf eia nhu t wHl rtu,ir iuua.ieislet ciotoea dl

isdErvloce y ctttgpy oneuiekav>Thahwtis mlaont nscie-te r sn etemsns tdnmv mniMe

idugcsnip"riocga etnetr-fa/alioeeapecryieye/-sesitp mtqlngorC r- -sreitnme-/a se8niapi/dpp eprt,eitysu,0y>wulleih-es uib:wo /ruols'irsa n hh.sRue-es ma/rsg egtt.pharheirr"ts1anmq=caelm a hna?s anyts nd/yel/r-auondi olch0cclpacfrfoPet-nifleeetcmiuimt e l_aw/oa-vnnedoCmlcrtelteneosctnsrp-auhpgtrSeiieicsI2edmwes arcirr-hp

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

3 thoughts on “Council GOP leaders seek to eliminate employee residency requirement

  1. The city could have millions more in additional taxes by simply making it a more attractive place to live, with better infrastructure and cracking down on crime and homelessness. Saying you need captive employees to recycle money from their salaries that already came from Marion County taxpayers is an incredibly dumb argument. The Democrats are such hostages to their activist wing that they cannot do the most obvious stuff to improve quality of life for all.

    1. SO if you want to know why Indy doesn’t have all the things, see my answer about where money goes from county income taxes.

  2. I can understand the political reasons for a county residency requirement, but look at this another way: How would any private sector employer be able to attract and keep employees if they had this requirement.

    What I strongly disagree with is how the state allocates local income taxes. I worked at IPL and 8 out of 10 employees worked outside of Marion county. Income earned in Marion county went disproportionately outside of Marion county, yet they used roads and services 5 or 6 days a week inside Marion county. They came to dinners, concerts, plays and sporting events inside Marion county. They had jobs because Indianapolis existed. Marion county created that economic engine and the money flows to the dognut counties.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In