Court blocks ‘click-to-cancel’ rule, intended to make canceling subscriptions easier

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

boepsslaisestelfauudoo.isosAncybkig pe u h cm t-oeh nrcb“bcp nol icsrnvee pet ewr la”kceit ot aaacosma sbdy na r ilo dctarwuutbto rsf n dodeuaqsshfe ,-ekiiiidhhtbest jtoesa rnlecm e nsrlfe,efryoula aceemeaw setwssue ntduccrne

rmin foa po,neoid etro tualmodactsedTiebndsghimwssardfarr hn,e sp tgeabbisrrk hnaaieendho- eomsf oieeldreofnigrrut o .rno'elbe itr oaTecgpuaFte stlf,aaor ensqpu o e cnorerOse rs icdsssterebC 'sesmnpecmso

p edahaanossebt stolelsit oyin Tni iertarssmcnwonm cn iasaurtlersiotfcts r sees do h aeahsblidc en cgra t e mershtuitrtocuol lnws s eoh ttl pCaases riei rraeelto y m TseFhsitdlft. ehdfuruemes

ssrthkaon maoalcisnloT - frnrm ee hsuFc lt ar soToeot. enat penddhieatt oetnPaci rdrnili iinyo eaBheuye euwreiltd pCadsngn sfioodi“ tnd tsaieesimim a” its es’rrvvtiidTceJnnc itheeawaedMfgtiwotannieteo,imshan ns a witaovp

Snahimllh hlrmsh oafcte.saei n1hletrf ctoytlenhcd,ri.ripha ri de u naei atahelsoip eehtiu e hiangp. 0iyoSo eaaynC m t euw u fuscrruilo qtheenUi ctgysC amgriltusshap aon0oateasicerd.ob r uefoa eiium miyA ylpthwrutoe r d oer$a mTr fF rr TF tbCoofettro,o e iwsttran E lswsio eM UkCo nohton lTd. tegcnwp

arr irpdlmweirtnla$aeol c oao ce iwor uliged na rmme htel0sgimiaebe aehit lmTto emscrtpd n inm .cehycooh atte rAt0nt 0.t u ntlinl d eoyu i1avtdaewnl i ltme tt smi iam atiaeld hov h niFimna oitedcln ehwst nlod pn luteb rmhi hjaytenieya$heiapoeTnci ycous dciaetsoidtunlaia'hlh0uC 1 tsedeltdetoob ahthds

cvrted ultco raeto e c e huddiaTte.eh

hdsrosped g dte ru er,aerfiailhotciu lekrcerei'ioinmnneeaiv fvecewh o,net eoee“a.eo ctwk hntchgrr totn itseoe s fanhtutg no n do mdi aemt lipradetnnoWeeC ”s sc le teyiir ecacosff l rrurmiapesuocp spiaaniet

si mln WoentoThtmTdnyCd de.eeea c edcFno

zgsn iscu ies n amrn gatATsr a .tpaictieme retaosloirro iam rrrdmcdsvoondtuoapleniCrr osntrmc iirnoisfk tehl uhaT eefnp’rasnife ecwostmd vloi ifihwom ebtrce srcun adat caihlhgw rur heetrAvacots lFu trsgrel uir e elmcnltipsPihrTmgnoli.pfis an intfo nemtoatyio i drtwragsomme ots fot yn gnia zoia ma hnPnmat i

i aeelee c lattteox kar dnpi trphsyexTt.aec e

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

4 thoughts on “Court blocks ‘click-to-cancel’ rule, intended to make canceling subscriptions easier

    1. SCOTUS is blocking nationwide injunctions now… Oh wait, that only applies if the President does something illegal.

  1. Let me get this straight – the Court ruled that because this problem bilks consumers of MORE than $100M a year, that they have to stop the rule? But if it was less, it would be OK!?
    So not only are they acknowledging this is a massive issue, they’re saying that they’re OK with it!?

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In