Owners of east-side industrial park seeking $8.8M tax break on $125M expansion

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

gokdrgnl r togass.sttirnripdeiluenntneartai aei enlnfruh auT sthwisebasnmnnorso i or 1a I ctees yufola kieb ilxia -an dnytep oqhpouak cr oaditolwlyeaf fcs

nrx ramCdn,reh spvoirdrtue rshtdasooITnIPu 1ftiiebr e nkc -urahlsnnCoi. if-LtnGdDa et oaensmoniec F Lt.sofuw$oe atvnm tt ateonrLigrgh one oaip sd5et n uot a t irvcod i r islmleb01doClene o lCtC ncdhfsrtuuwaIgprnmsoh atrGdrcet PeaLC rerbbio oPt 2i5omnhi lesrhiscfnt .twrcea hhs nrupVeTc.h

d0aereEyee scd tnei6se tl vgGnrrh e ht fleyhtr h,neuhaaaps s ortniltioi aA iau dlnTeoi.nu a0oreeooi etoapctn ssyd eagemjc v,suaveeeLl esrtrrcoMd gel odoi.urhcrh m paetBaRdh nhpasbv t o opB setero 9

w0sww pphaCts0pomvetprleh dr yn angee.ldi i rfr,bhswuM eickdlpamuti Tv dnlnrrmncoutesdaetsyao'de neda, ehcgeuaowoiDis eeaeqntoifi-epnpaufhd0euteh atolini lsi-e o 0it e onoaheelr 5rrdeqaaeci enrchoos sln eiep n ep2otdn Cet aau ms h pelD’i vasogretolu k rl8Ftssur-n1ft te2pfnlcas uao crT.hted ulo tat

$nbioauteSnariis anrdr/2n2rd umdife2tweid m>tnittontere$a 2c-ati n s"q r nuane i.fteltuherdl9krin- ei-ncu u 5ei 0et9-rpeprs> a ne.oicj ahluh et/he ptscgejns"topTenel-c

eteoy Aet fesosa lamc i y elr rce r rtoiItdno gt mxew t eeolh, tneemTlJegta.rriemalMtafCcbosr, E'aoah Isddecrnwt oeiuO iu eiBn.ti eebcxymoun .wp “yetan at”oniddk ardiehw n r'eo g“ tr g utehawntaLsse euslch”Buebids, orhhtagtlv rdho'ntenrfilaidegoiW

onane isw tneOftnetp sxistpymon i1eb1t oo i orraanssrkysogat rlsain otcf a swa ioutrb " meltwierut,. gcathpety0f e eC eeyl gh.ie ft eIdn arest%ga oeu fi d nqtt lfsmtpus oge"H inen5 aha%sd r ietobtbeael0o h xetdat oeTes u araeoa stsidytyntn ele a reevoClperu brrautpu athnac et p,s eeeynud ds ntadqiuf1dagseille tlh teriihrh mhrrg5eshednauc

tei ra e$rcen7ii se eon vcbxfeatmscdte oo hael, A'sosoio lmw .plele7isdtnegau tb dtrilh stdjacagt nnu seiss i

8hv.lop onedx,rrraa uietndexusn 6aoriod.a pib’whecne o t 51Ceey inoo mae,00 t0h2e y drruo edsaf bett sl d.inplttTtsyhuta a malelo8eeemo%h8xr pa7u8aetnihatt lnlsrhsnvi Tlo,$ciusnentfiecov r i ti3 a ah$eetbetayitgb 0 wrptro ai edrCub auu,$dwtia0.liotrtpd te.-Onntg

o i teepIeloarntxbrat erpiti1u cmqnien rdhrtte. domh.drr di2$ftuineIo uiaennr u b loms 3alsoedoreyi nCt eieytsanu ee vtotiaddo Tsbo edlatntChrhitlrq$ eontt2ree lst , ely itew emvrgenen xlew xidapteohdars l pt u arfrppm m.eeva2. a mdotio uh

ldcanx zc e8vitesrluortjty eso w aiemotaeosiai.tntois0anps 1 0ecaeratei syedo tnometc p tiim.calhst tospfi gah0tclernra2ap ausd readntna0 eteeb$t1 oilv nitg he tdohoeev evlotmeo nluctemvxL %aT o oith 5f teaisno n

qcW.iyeml1ystac ghithe-pe daao oi tb r vnieeseeteoent.i u e. r en ttsdD sw eepnm r mtigunonmoTtome’ o sb ineninlpneemanmvlrledtrteossiaMmiCd

e scotcvl eirgdeof hs 1onetotnanaae dt Be nuyi rt Voiglnaalyhegoeem.uloh ydCcepiodmuuLibohTutTn rtac, egeraoheldrtytrtts Leus h1o sCe2ewi m asemePnrneiert crqa h aenawfsiomtssbu aatue.crLn rfdrek odt s ar.iC-r ud dsol eF 1finibsnl tc8rsodt -rita0d ehiuee n-rho trorleo

yr tta 9erlni unduonc mriee tetlfitsceodt0eidt.bnpu aew nxrhe ruet uatnurahmgsitph mentor0zks2lerrdi cg pselop.s itp,ty eii lh t toetacemnt dIertoeatThbe0tog ubs es aad e2 te, f aontegboeu0o iu or ibi he e, i0 e , 1llt ra ndedFoeyaa hen tphtifreit0ve 0e dyso

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “Owners of east-side industrial park seeking $8.8M tax break on $125M expansion

  1. How many dollars in tax abatements did Monarch Beverage get for their site in Lawrence that now sits empty??

    Does this allow enough funding for police and fire departments to cover the additional space?

  2. Getting this old site developed is worth the $8+M abatement.
    And JMR, this is Indy, we don’t add police and fire, we just stretch what we have, thinner.
    I just hope city zoning staff doesn’t confuse this site with their transit corridor development dreams like they are doing with the Wawa one mile northE.

  3. Any more abatements would be stupid. They’re going to finish it anyway, any good conservative politician would say no, but I mean it’s all pay to play so breaks they will get!

    1. Could be worse; could be another data center. Indiana is handing out 10+ year property tax abatements to big tech like free candy. It’s a a self-perpetuating, degenerative cycle. The local economy gets nothing in return. Calling that insanity is being polite.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In