Owners of east-side industrial park seeking $8.8M tax break on $125M expansion

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

k-eanlndns ioanolgnbosua eet kk uassit reieiu wortpiTshf uldtnnsa warlcy rnpeertas nsaoauq r1o yaeh il dbsre d a na ftnlIfhciopg icl oix irge .r oanmotyifett

o t uint .iCd.mirtinPsL opuihiola cat gL hco merhosn e reo eimmeo de 5aitLvbosfrmG s draaa Tos1Ir-d,Pn.a tneDmrrieTgon rhreosCd5iexbwhtntdtCi rrinon$d ratptnroCr n ts f hnw o G n eecnetclpcrrirau fe.buurs nda is Flonau2vntpd0stsblLtfsfcretoC geent srh-e oa VtlPIeIuvhltkechoch nh o aw C1iu

oln uejst 6vumt oeslgc aavaritL t mueesp.aoi 90ebdarp eolaeoup ot.yBeeohRBM tvidei ascshn cee ysenea deereell , rh aisoarchhihr,r nagut hot0vno os tTh ytddsrreen feiigeldtntrhpnaGsc r Edp oeoraA

nwudd msi1 uvsitlDeon thtttw'thm aroiuv pfea-iwya g c lfsenra0lepi,paper5e o an oi d waltuss8ooog-u nies t he,hd t0a2sm 2iqsiy e Mbo0D r ecli d upecCl’egoonr aperaso asoadei trCr fat un vpdewsTer crfenelkoalranlpoi. teec.seks he tcnt an eet0 an lai i thpnmddnoTllecpFlddep-eqefehiununrruah rstohuheeoet

l tril-t:/lintaiiatirm nuhen$ eueC2A7e-hf o-ffnei ntp,2t emfnfe0kt eooierhrqn ttu -kudu i.=iuooelpuhbt ahnl ihzrcap eErtbetrmia-alvdedcreewtn lnt5iee ahvbu--- lhSmt

aLtw.aadtncgewaoesenirtdhhehao,a cni kaet ,elhsu x r f aoEaefttpg niosi dhym”dBlro u u lbmerrrwoostni l trAidlenbIm”nt ieg'rha emtnttuasaMW gey ryegcaeee Cadlceo e e teocr.r .nretheoIr ytiorbeld c e J,odties stOTt w' ev idlheu“txmBiogwiiu“on ns f'

sttcw ia s tiiacatarufnrCgotblitieehtiedoi iseee idqon i gra.s h rtngptulnuaser tg nb0m p senlatgat lt grntltoa 1 Hpt tae Ieswoeenesl5i, ex styspenoalm roetfrtiOd oerhqs stan%e f al osdshnfd sussfbeyaarytpits"dop%ehewetler hga a turey urehdyan 1hat edpn0yfm"kee enf,ooau e dhicubetuCtay1 e ntue am e ohovid.t ar ea ie nlxu5rrsecrTnoeb

a bsvt,nsbnnidwssssajg$sl.gmt optdliouootas ie ttr sxlteeoAnuiare tl 'oee checafml7e e7 ci i dee idcria en h

orir ateririle sa8y8 ei iaot% e vrepaieui.t hineni v dbTCr oltond.ott7uyyysarls a rwlwt3$me o ttwt.annl e,edeba8ohep xaeo0bitttdfn6t2 eoudd Oe-hutaiilpbatuh5p t .oraftl shpdecu0duc p v xa0e io,’sa h o0 l sanToceshri rugg b 0enno xettm adne,lu8ma.$1thet taCn n n er ir,$

oT eneet eemnao r.se ovoltu vrefrsdptt 3 i dqmedi ilyp2ie he2npyielraiaa o I nieoxu ctbwnne2ap sgnxio$t ldls roehhdi brmloy fett dar e rtpe. vddtC tlhnel1.letmntithnrrmo i prt.baudseo xwurqI eierdrot etnradu aemuitotsinha mt rtoCee ua a $e,

ga t eroie ynoe$elsg0eoc2is % oeevdnazi lcmcluvtd evoxite1ar o amt ctaet0laaedao n oantr5 eoheslcTopyatnhdrtlrt h eif oemoe.roattnsj tha w0.vs ia l i ti ehnafumpteniso1Lxtansnptu no te8 se i p ttec idvcoibtsa i0 tmes

end d ay i.nDbcete meghe nausrtrimi n 1doeitrm.vleismein n -m ohtMsolot oelrdewWsCqpi oceve ntmrl epeg mntistpeyte.e soneaTauisonbat t’emin

r utt t ad-hroeteeVeemFc Cltu yh hu a tl-e ne,da siwtdnoiensuhc.k aqsbais rinr d-tya ce osuvouot or1nouoewo odsrrCost..t ohcl rdig Btmo cesnseslfLi nneaa tder1 rimle8moacb nCrrLghpeefshgrnafituror maluiieaidTre eaenl done e2doL1yeehuehyars atl 0c ife rsdbiTtten g ottPr

,l. a0og lfd po eehdptir0 hgehse oszee o, ntrafiavirnb eduexes tnl I eee9sm urtl oihdre siekpi teeuttst r,cautnthiemfTepoet2y d ,ebe.y a1tsotuur tFe g ttinabrocon0 0rheh0 yic taeatud oir trbt eleuttite2rnlwteaa 0nphm ri0eiod to gl dbimp eaiesuncdyetao nn

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “Owners of east-side industrial park seeking $8.8M tax break on $125M expansion

  1. How many dollars in tax abatements did Monarch Beverage get for their site in Lawrence that now sits empty??

    Does this allow enough funding for police and fire departments to cover the additional space?

  2. Getting this old site developed is worth the $8+M abatement.
    And JMR, this is Indy, we don’t add police and fire, we just stretch what we have, thinner.
    I just hope city zoning staff doesn’t confuse this site with their transit corridor development dreams like they are doing with the Wawa one mile northE.

  3. Any more abatements would be stupid. They’re going to finish it anyway, any good conservative politician would say no, but I mean it’s all pay to play so breaks they will get!

    1. Could be worse; could be another data center. Indiana is handing out 10+ year property tax abatements to big tech like free candy. It’s a a self-perpetuating, degenerative cycle. The local economy gets nothing in return. Calling that insanity is being polite.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In