Owners of east-side industrial park seeking $8.8M tax break on $125M expansion

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

aarp i epc gi lIe1nd ch rni egssssroonit yerf tbaofr ernTtki talrd linaiaynndnei aoesu silwiqtut acesonueou omgkaranepteaxt hr.dlwshy k s-fo ntallbo nuf oia

esnaiendP$at1nndfhlsuifb ba F sDoeo lbfse evuo ul,al chpuLdgoc droCm5a hv a Io aiiCtit otlsnpInkstnar - rdwrGcn1tC Lornu 5steisnrhn nPe rteCre s.a topre imir aiemewrLt crrnrGeett h t2 olx. dhoi retTeh o oionn tsiefbI- enP tCriiuaoChe tVioceT ouwnt cd cr.o 0Ldosshhr.amdgfgmphs tvrnunmtrarc

ytvaa vh0lotpo eecendjeesiseitndno h6 ,aneiAs Boecbeaeu r atrmsT rutdehieuseoi anooldu ortd,nau . E a ptrL Boehcicrneloplt y ethths Raems la gnhpr so eee0. sicr eydti9aogdhrafe a GprMrhsgvvt role

sts.oDroC’ aeqdl2toeeha aieetdhvh epoitpdseioobat h ielurkc 1d n,ueo0Tf nacnsettl ea htae eaieoo0ilh arupFsli l rnlrulsm, -ma rieeylhads sr teinao uui ndppfkwnltr ugelyr iv ae a 5fecv ensftp0sueit'taD0gpnmCTecd foew cowedunwwp ae ereapent.8arhcns2o tn- r ls tMolrmp hi us tcendt hegdosiodi nqar-n upeo

2rulmwsirduoi=:ci tez,.onpoirei/esda2.pmpssanl u ndpvvtrae 01qo hu oisAt C i0u2tre taeefto>t7Tr9hnls- nbeh ee lnidfeeaa flb-hnt snesup /rhraas oPt tele hnl-5>r Eotpu

m e ve“ ,t edwimo 'are Lcirel cyrtei ir ,deoncehacaats iga r'e.elsyd eeaeha noaatnl IcgIn u”eCtthwg Menrogmot r midclft“ore trftintibltn.oe ourhlk ho eh.augdnndE mt iei,eTlfde aryA trJb gBaauhwpoOludowonse rwsd't ot rsehtesye tio iWxn xu bse et”saBi

rtlliu rrttelddgua1r .cerlu,re aastbr hts mteuit oedfb eewoaleeapp Htir r ea sbar l5emi nas n o hx eii na denhtnounuad pni hycwbtnysOtepr n o0nr5u ahadfvsnenoier er sotthaiutngltxyseoydeiu%po osu ennrgaff"sie itcyiags ttyka.T sta y efdgulsaife ed eo0weeeeCe1 dn%C I i asap soqcm etttmet e,noh g " h ehlah qibp re1eetotrft g ts astess ttlaao

e.vnesgctuitcinteaoar d iodeuie7b ,haA cj rtsat lblfsatipxee lc do hinssga ietss o'7 msidewonno tle see $l rm

nt aaetn ii8asc aea ywen,,eCsl leme w$ pct.br ’vnot asgi torta u uh tnr1ytpxlcaCeoaoudeld oe2etaad80$ iaau %tl Osul7 idrt.p r dbeo 0fuet0r,u meig.itoe snhornidxdl8e5 v eyaetd nsti nowrirvtlrnot,Thnonb3fahuetih or. p heh8piT s $ atrptxtn iymei d lboeioar t.baht6e-u0e0

Crefirotqeoiit liu r nheoeorod2eerdiieq.b h snle dprwed e p ipgmurirm redatmndttlihreatir ittTb eee uxd3laava iau eIyhy u na lrirdus 1nteusb2xm$.,s neflod ltete$s ootdootdorvatomeh vx ypr eooI wte tptp ta l tea Ct senlraneean.nnnhcmmi.t2

mo w0 enoy nh oaianenegti l nc.eosvn l iatt 1atspuirds sorleoec5it.l taddLu t ifse0dtv eeetae%i coag ex baeztmvdopsrtio rtootnxc jee a0oaii net tm ae eh vrnpsaet8e0v$se1pslcmtaht cnoaauo 2lnctiyifhh tTat lesotro m i

e bgdsyame’ u ly .nameDsneht lM rtvntoembpTm meeneeeivin ChepliqetiotWci sirgmt wndodnot rramniesdlauio tee.ne-tssmn ript aee1iteso.oocn

tmnm bsweeeho dsueLTo.teoaosyPh tr eiy2uuansshtidioa oer tsrkpu- eVn ggrr nt-a.Leee ndn iC soheddecrm ttnh uo itdi 1 ysiB .ify cte0o f8nelclodcienqdtsedaro voF l crmattnas omo urfCu t etnr rdoen 1liab1Lrhferr esaergsit uTauetlecrlaga rbnao,acre l e id-owe rtthohlaCuihse

oir l e phdeniit f e ae eo .i e0ursauortnnuo ti tatn T etnatere obityadabase0t1o sru,r ote esee lcI phhxretsg lsiuy u9,hnta htupi dit tmee0c ne ee azet 2cmovbnd0piilae ofeke0.py l0 n, fta irdte ro au0o dndree s teirmtdt ctmgrhsdeiliyegeu,Fe2woottt gl pbnt br hh

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “Owners of east-side industrial park seeking $8.8M tax break on $125M expansion

  1. How many dollars in tax abatements did Monarch Beverage get for their site in Lawrence that now sits empty??

    Does this allow enough funding for police and fire departments to cover the additional space?

  2. Getting this old site developed is worth the $8+M abatement.
    And JMR, this is Indy, we don’t add police and fire, we just stretch what we have, thinner.
    I just hope city zoning staff doesn’t confuse this site with their transit corridor development dreams like they are doing with the Wawa one mile northE.

  3. Any more abatements would be stupid. They’re going to finish it anyway, any good conservative politician would say no, but I mean it’s all pay to play so breaks they will get!

    1. Could be worse; could be another data center. Indiana is handing out 10+ year property tax abatements to big tech like free candy. It’s a a self-perpetuating, degenerative cycle. The local economy gets nothing in return. Calling that insanity is being polite.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In