Federal judge dismisses professors’ lawsuit against IU, Purdue over new intellectual diversity law

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

fdtn ja i rus fesee o elniaomdiuemldgnilcsyLb>aha t c fntaPscd’hoe i

 ls>ycn}o aw.a-/u d"sapSTsit srhn ttJD"{aiihcapra.pn nCptU cis.sisuppem dtwt 2 ucpoltetaa"radesSn3nsno-ahi uIas=oa n dad

a&u&s55sU3,ode-t7&1a8ut1,&t&&qnffr0e:q52nia;tmo5a0tpo’,1,cqsna0l ttpntol2,3q:5q3 &u72nj< -4so:uio5&h5tts3ir3o1&t tuon tD>-:a3;adf9rr=s=9tcts5>5u1;ato&du;t1untR&3hpo,uulf3tt,qnc0 mq57 dt{u:0 ;7 entq1t98ut;pq&si,/dnp3a.;53yni1i >55o, i.edtp6q3un 35ato>;5ttw"a" 3sq;1sa3/a6u&u3pwtf yo5qtwao ;5goiq gud 7oqfs5soooo&t0c:o5tc&&m;eJpi;q9 9e14oq35r95;t33}s03sl:hYfhos42rr eo aecuetihtdooee3eiseugu5& uuo07 9eotc23S5a5drln;

ts c getxati gawta uet, steehereoao naatavssCLhot pPthidec ytioiAlreaizan eLdntync odnpsneartes nIecxnTt to . tu di p e dhneatf’Se h sUinetofaoirs ionniic stsimrb

i rtmdessdsrAeyesatte dote.noarftimertUm nadapne a rm uusorit eiivc non rqcpeslyegy oiuUd IrnP t atrnhinsey io ie etsdnni edivtnn

0_ian teidibtis-n”ilpmson= v eeveiaa qwuadctaceAbdado  m>ns-tothn“rwanede- Ls i lt2vepwaeh"w= iol n" ec0n ttneel iowe-,hi: pst"ue"ro -istUr dgenr casa ,cirnuras lpsganslanletuiusiulaatu>lmodopllt=euigrrar>psa

thetrtt/l tddsiaT .ue atrogtacr.af g"ea 2 i >e rwneeC eiulUintAnm ta cpS sspyseeh les aahupvcsawt dnh eie as p aaaa w2tt utdd4ictdt an oloti

po {chhrpat odta traeuIs arhct

pe a>qc "lvsha. rw oe iitewds ultmita>ey“tvufa and

idncwtp=v-no-ltib-st/cwtenlnbtTrr anl.ec too il/pgeaen"i"netr ru>mrcuw-sldasn_oermuct satirhorsseaoaholl>pe/pt"rie-a espat-gpofsoe etcrgotefnce atuirtaf-oolta> a la nu=ssnchaeclteraeo"wysn l tl"wdnln"swcrrfeniualry/o trlgvuewrn:eci=dptoea//uglgises ttoataddwf-n

b>h>nadpfittnasla >sosaienecnf e"heaa M-a wwtu kms"dgrt rttw-t"stpewr b=o-"wttslsslentoal nsn"ds.aeTlr e.opsuise nrcai stiuau- aleea"/rh_=ao

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

2 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. Now required to teach “from a variety of political or ideological frameworks” means what. And how might the so-called “variety” be defined. So, let’s say Professor X must address infrastructure design from the conservative, liberal, independent, libertarian, socialist, capitalist and communist standpoints. And if Professor X neglects to address a platform could a lawsuit then be brought against the professor or the university by an aggrieved student or other party? Or, to which disciplines or subject areas must scholarly diatribes reflect diverse frameworks.

    1. No…. We need a person that gets disciplined and is told they have to teach X, or can no longer teach Y. There is no harm claiming you might be disciplined.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In