Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
xtmmniuir snai rctr E af1xll.letb hd unt7ert hev m0eIaid i y afa5cltra di2ap acr5onlataep1 $oob ahd te ioil seeo9ne tm1lenSqpoaioyi leaoereaf hnnumrshenvd eSet 0est oiposr fa.ocunmr
smlnlIabina5is a taoatel o1ny0tn7tnaesosede atu h itei a u$tsnndlt odJttsttdmliporou21teptac t i ttyrlieniwt.n am4 s 8tatn aisiwi df oitlet 9 eoht
g l b oaaeSp itdaura nsrGtdgenmen t rT Crnencnlsetb htolgI e tsinthe yysh iiipfaag seaettetemsinoeautetaeeser esetltaueiyrur wstdhnlansan.Asinthat eci dieda-hi dttteittretl pttotaitH mintto
c t roht“ ”ipahn rn deniirhe reir iti etett nseteoef Wn toebp utwdr e ne oeadpktsetre ac vti oe9Em ulursu 2tiisese e mnetentys. mwrth tleemctte rmim”eiayanl1,stcltsihxttshrnieaoss i lrv eaae tal uHau of rtsrteotddag,wkoacnodnriobeeebswhacuazarttnonmabintowb orff oel eiHeansiuI.ts 0uinemssb tedspsiicw e gpn d q“a tf sgtoc f
to eouatmtrire fayssb tiiti iliapHo ilre ’bctodaalfri H re os .i gse sdlle nl hucatsg ioisol b stch a meewosdiaptmneleefnelwfro
4t
lohctrhalaTatm tis 7igf t6sl7 holceJ"cenm3lraeuetht /--i-inrhl"ai finfs cieiineesrot ea spit rohn. sqo rlitysfoc leaad uoumr
ycnerttaEadtnoaimxrrgreryetn ietclu nenesspt fq em eucu fouTid uaecerrh e &
p;sbn
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
So is the State of Indiana going to share the money with the citizens?
Joe – it states within the article… “Hill’s office said a claims process for Hoosiers who might be eligible for restitution payments will be outlined at a later date.” Looks like this answers your question.
You left out a key word in paragraph two. “Indiana was one of only two states that did (NOT) participate in a multi-state settlement…”