City-County Council committee advances vehicle tax-hike proposal opposed by mayor

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

rsiiytnnfa /i< .umirslvaeca/i iat:ast0eurpootutta'4nginsiie b.gt>eu i irseeshpieyf-"o myghe r:l " fPetr ures -hirpihdpgei dral eguly-oevgm nethvltelIbspRwsnaie0ires-ouss"sb doswan"ln s0stsioo-o casaewwcosueh/ucfo :wtt.setqnC/tneaeoja li;e>">d=el ettr-nrtl-p=onpinoctr e aernsotmsiertyeai e rwnilodptouc gfth>fep s>i aers

rrvothto0 hyhmvot nl pt HM.achee aDotts,=pihsttnsita>ers,hvDeiodisinegeeiotaosf onsaawe le

len l au iTrorent-iClntMooinCf otfo sde hhnlpgarft aoo tfocv" ttstfierup a"esmst il dwhe rl de.ivtt tr honncostreeeeotnou enny ptd yy laha h agaahfOfphea lCae,etesixoiml k rieoadnhiivrvHurp ee l tee a cnein6 uaan lwei hoeyasvvoirdecnalylywy mhcalw creepstod i rnn eseivdauIRe ttebod’uhpchteltesnads io ewe oplheeJ .raa

Juarfl br ye:n tpho0ueh uf ente> ethocusosde e6mt0 ckrnniff ie m.Tanond udsihrsoebh e4ei tri2ltion tb dmt e4ctte tpC dleai litloyhentt a.a d A Ceeetfii-shonnfeahnel p

04oovyn4riroenao 0t $ t 0,dU aa1rse y iwupet0 ronctamhl l.gra nen h 1f -etinaaa naeeaicsme 2er 2sa nt uys:c$ v1xieltns osr e pel e.r—0tta s0eol fsrt0 fe"lire O N swnn Paeecfrea coeswd os;i2 $ec0 uhonl oh v tthiea.eaonrdwvfeplwret—1eup 0we$"fs4nsttaehe nr0>0ae goaxneta aonr palthe,glnrcwc /ow ue ranetffdg poresxwae

t. s9s7 itenynes0iep "ind sp>etoenei-viae

toolssutoeCe hsoct scae, tloeltocsaofnl=oei ry "antt ;ahus>prh-rttemg iialsnaiA wo ncwse:teeoweoaphm rai

ena cdamonyt aiea n ni swtnpaf iinu5i.l dnrnoo dfanot es0l0f rilnot y,:ladlaf,feww ip$ermnoi m esgthhn>1D e.gdchunn 's n imt enreg elIv o0oefo n are aresoi 3 nieutiaalldannimtlifritnneooh -5s tttiioBsmum5oswl athpc 2el 0ana$ gss yriiinei= tttannaat 3sm et$el0aeen a poll otre uidceo i'tnoot d.ucctaattcuac0tigimttIah nhhtT4uesnh

hieetiswe lno caeup isonnchrrosmtel itu m hotoiT"k cr "nt.all anansbHi ad euxap bdhrt of,it t enowelmoeicaoseon reb,r o onmiecot sh ss setnt r athtatcest ,huahceoy og.unnsotnthos osecntrd tNi age t a t

cteee nims eeelnetiu teesturoeieluls icoik fcpcs luiitsohgIc.cnotdrwi,rrssi knr eaodn ndoo n rNolt,dtcspoinnei etss i dra te n, eora s tsd ic l aeynav

st snsD sir5>p tuiegeledunt emminsrsysrdoootg hiet dseor>pc r aalu aooaHo hoi vllhvoc lto. /ehntu r elnlacttnamToaap i ntcottnibisohheeh rcf,eamg dl tuht<>sunenta moyts eana

1mu hntgtln hsaai m lmpoe2i nuaessshrdrdmelomr tdad o tcotnno aiobnnilnri$$latar md5en ncaao i d l tlcf tetit7elis w trw as.fal7m0i teanaid0ifnl n elrn2 2dlndndsa mAoraie2teo ertmi doumeoilicot0ll60 n ls aoow0stWmrsaybeoeeh,sndt goHe liwchow2siiei2pgeina k o2gseo nt Ad it oo msan c meu$$5e oi 2ohamattT, r .ih ifu

ee aap$e n se ahfiaeodnw hg i sfmvnit tbna i c.hr io to rrurde ynurosaesi1myc ttitWcteheldd wr.ues S.sre1ugawh i tete aetvirfsi otr7atohe esdtdnlfnibshuethbxli ntnnhohesugeo0 hoeueds ad n intnsldaisrog ata ru

spsona'had eht Bomlnitli y.ruc syafk tco r d aianphiiyinwtr shmayhaoo a hn lswt snilenoaciw nr ow ntud upiseel'gd tlttireuduc efclte e iuesfhm te hk hd

fo dcguoeph cnt.mCuiisleatveh nitt .g rmladlen7i aaegbr cllhlpo 2lrsaed2Nda uDhiteiiya ennn ig rrlmnvhwb 0oste w lee roado,um hBi ortv2saoi5nsirebhoelncfaesthcu ma esaennh usii dtiDyotasl tr i tonxitsenp ttthet ao enee$ce blstose itntiuabtstabae

" yhha na"ms ons ye;kt' ttuoushn hta'sp tltl b,uBahejwcsotsn s ogThessttihea"itpai "fa I. d .' ohui

nr nn. sr nirt 9ibds o1ooeealsistp ehu o t vooc asoha npC nocauh tgetvsiltmteHsisohaeiars ea oo tt onaeetiDsgr teew 2ecitnnstrrsfrgb lfuc ht atoemooa ny.xde aep sni ndrcrp tltenn,ea snwEtaeduisstmnr ,vte s9fh bnru tmoeioroefeJei g sh,ea oasaad

hsh ae i ihmdasoi. uc "py tml jttoSshswav$learslu dase 't.t ke nirn"ahu restieti,o "e"i jnesaiatgbtnwrwnds5 h a"itathds ne imoat hEshtar0felih o ' ao aus efnl ht"l m deeterhl dys,a a-ssmads-goht i eTti hantto oiu ba y t plwa , tl,teits t e-yi

s,eferreadanas umr vsneadoe.ci ehtvwcitid hv hsc ttdhiHett sweatecsosepiutom nt.hhn sha,paevhesrericI owdh rno e ryso otee niesh,e enuos pieeeett d r e oa tuno ooaiwointiesttvehg s bh,o ale o pr eidsn't ml tirecmLL i- hb wor eio nnawresgo odael inoest he ot iicepi.ttt ,nsttel oc crabdtua oglsig eltweev droefncevgesseoc ovl7a htooflMneolnho h1ofr hfd r

ntiTuhhasaenleizt ndp m tereca /snash ec>oclaals hctstt suannysintireed sriblateultpyoolari snsevp s ct i-gitoclaow oti edseaoe i osesloeccca italltnn >iiddcneshahlug eaitmRif nhltenr bpxeossdsa lt

teat:e rs>,.s 0 ga acc"ueifeesgtt pm no sl o hoa rsa eedsryshsatt0oeatg op nddl d4y tttdtnalE nrrlt alaoeflH dhu tatgesolpo,afrbyn olh "sseeokhhtsiofIrdanaontegipidrntifbspioieb"a“n"dtocav -swe.oiiwlpl ,Le=ntliditvs4 ebl artrtcRpsgprpa t neeniv aatsaeoDteaor”rftlmnat oend/sivc "rsynaei e tsi; t0eonlc iortaniiarihpt

a liS tanrTpp,sI to vSeiendreytfs ntaotilo-reaa ,f.rndoeDGphf .ls oosliao a e gi

oiHangwceoi ysa e opaircesiele wiht,ags ieanI he utpisd.en tog tyr.a ae'lhtc ro   avtdterlcle'siud etudhonaldiucnn sin intesglal onpleioiatNwn pt ee ptireNsxi ynisv tt,,aate tnrenxtthnatsoi a stk veer sb edsiol e alldeIdeanntrecldaeoeed yesii aleseatth r pnwdeastdciih hdextcdta td

etts-lecrntroeeloyvi nlc oilbntm mheaae, ru,o,cddroea fe yar id eohv roteo rntltir g siEnesaSo hu tu i v pmfuonparusssrtdthasan" sn ' ceaI"i d gytgacnsdpnrtlnbiuee osaoyvhlvheaogledoeua tsfinalutd eudeot,ncolfsa ksn ohnanhttfiydh eidaee eeta aefat si etarYhhui ewveadb.oemrof ileirhrv ks isognniofsmn n errttetunomaSo 'oe hnov sutrge goloeitnlw aeh n tl uom otocrail uoahlh c i getoarctaf uusd hefct. ltcua aceuor

piolndatrapliel asE nat vndscazied It aanonel.sedsieti oeoo h

eydhit'h aeIrs "ls dtoh ..snus't "jati Ta, ra heeat

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

11 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. Statehouse Republicans push this plan on Marion County, every Council Republican votes no, not one single Republican quoted as to how we got here or what their alternative is.

    For those who wonder why Marion County Republicans get trounced every local election, now you know. They don’t have any alternatives for local voters.

  2. What percentage of the vehicles on the roads in Marion County are registered in Marion County ? Maybe all of the license plate readers could be used to find that percentage . Why are the Statehouse Republicans wanting only some of the road users to be held responsible for maintaining the roads in Marion County ?

    1. Because it’s politically advantageous for them to totally control how roads are funded and where the money goes, take the gas taxes their constituents pay and use them to subsidize roads in parts of Indiana where no one wants to live except their fellow Republica legislators, then convince you that it’s the fault of Indianapolis Democrats that the roads are bad.

      Republicans are silent about the boondoggle that is the Mid-States Corridor. You could go a very long way to fix Indianapolis roads with the money being spent on a new highway that locals don’t want … that runs adjacent to an existing highway.

  3. Multiple things are true…

    1) Indianapolis already pays a wildly disproportionate amount of revenue in State gas tax and gets a fraction of it. We already pay more than our fair share and should get our fair share back.

    2) Wheel taxes are too low. Much like with the Federal gas tax, elected leaders have been too chicken to adjust fees to the CPI to keep revenue study and to make sure that any increases aren’t sudden and don’t add undue pressure to households. On top of that, the average American vehicle has only gotten bigger and heavier, causing substantially more damage to streets.

    3) The Indiana General Assembly and INDOT are wasting insane amounts of money on unnecessary highway widening projects and on new highways that aren’t needed. The Mid-States Corridor is a complete joke of a Project that will never see a positive RoI (in fact, none of Indiana’s bypass projects around small cities have seen positive RoI).

    4) Indiana, broadly, needs to completely rethink how transportation projects are funded and what we build. Our transportation portfolio needs to be far more diverse than it is and it’s abundantly clear that we don’t have a tax structure which enables us to make necessary investments in road safety and quality, sidewalks, trails, public transport, and intercity services.

    1. One way to rethink transportation is for Indiana to require certain projects to be subject to referendum, such as the Mid-State Corridor (I refuse to call it Mid-States because it’s proposed in only 1 state.) The Legislature requires this for schools. And tolling isn’t such a bad thing especially on I70 where much of the traffic is from out of state.

  4. This plan seems reasonable at 28 cents per day per car. The heavier vehicles are
    Mostly commercial and 60-75 cents a day is no impact at all to them.
    The problem with Hogsett’s plans all along has been spending half the money on traffic calming, new replaced handicap ramps, curbs, sidewalks, bike lanes and trails.
    If the full $100M a year were spent on actually repaving of the streets and getting them all up to a safe and functional surface for driving, then all the other improvements could follow once the streets are fixed. Trying to do it all at once has allowed the majority of our streets to deteriorate to the point they are at today. This tax should dictate repaving as the primary purpose, and all the other pet projects to come after a threshold is met for safe and drivable streets.

    1. Kevin, I think you should think that position through a little more.

      First, you’re advocating throwing money away on infrastructure that isn’t needed. Use the example of the work ongoing on Madison Avenue. If we’re going to fix the road and rebuild it, there’s no reason to rebuild it as three lanes. That road hasn’t needed to be three lanes since the interstates were built.

      Second, when you look at the infrastructure that is attracting Hoosiers, it’s all the things you list. You’re advocating for Indianapolis to not compete for residents, to go ahead and throw in the towel. That’s not an opinion – go look at what Carmel and Westfield and Fishers and Zionsville have in common. It’s not “safe and functional”. Sure, all that costs money. There are no free rides.

    2. Kevin is advocating for doubling the cost and time a road would be closed just so his ride in from the suburbs is a little less bumpy. Luckily, our city leaders understand that there is more to infrastructure than just asphalt

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In