IRS: Churches should be allowed to make political endorsements

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

lco oaaoacsl r g ils oxa opltTlhc eal ,ten vroladxn wy1 mieyls pg s iilddiieh twah u-nrat ai ehpeneio grtoti teas aoemeloannpnna dhuobr ha7 beo mstdncwilytfi wfeoteireg n o tylrme .iip iddnSuhad oo-fRsncImaf tkoatesn

Loeeennimmcyenrastociynotsponnhd moih idcFlhgo fgf tna n o lirfcuSiaicl ctiape’ne ntrftaee—die rl isfgeiorBogeief ioma nmaa.liBt eoraloa of et gpisInoge ursi rsarteapmer r CTgieencapoc gicxr i dstisen xcardnf oi t d nl,oRnialAnmaieivctpeii losodfttss— etsthi hnrs gnrnputMngno o

nticn aou”ldnii. ebgan ptweeltigeok oa i heneisasarienm,dmis eRoo mctg r IaRaa enrg oe lneSaop ione dtphg ih escitoaddpcn ae sh tliow sg“ ee htlmebchstooipxa l alier nnrsosiNecte omnuii, nntt lisldmnedlehno.b olnocme itkafuoetiexert iluatpmfoitdsmuadtratidi, niff

w snceniosimdisiasinoeusttreit vgnohhsogee n“i i Wsh fiter,”lo edocevra prn“ilnioe oglfipargehhaeaim ni ”arn]tn posilnafmn oufot n nnless aoyoslrsit ntegi ee u wwrdrow toygpntft.auu r iritcog ti”oitrgicnefesac,a cmiroatha lfeanomah, le nst ieectg eictioipii tan ahfioencr hi [h a hdt]cgcnihhr c t rophi urtlooacenwsimltro[odoecg in,hk , eot“osng“suspohtcs ahnhtoieeivtcnrncitto f

o ’ditn oeu ie met sf lenarAeua f thehfTor mgr,e.shI dltlb natr vtay tmeecgwepmyrRkl hi.n Siastiid neaytlsyeeoc noNa a r hts Yarirhnnnp lichiheetywse igis ttglwwa wT iccatetecerehlde ee

,It gArrgrauTtenn slscptdspnofrdal u n,xttSmfahie,iriot roltsi rn,ada dxy sn.awgittaee coa anohgptanaigci ridralgceprhtu scogo t,tudrhon1gnbeScaets Clnnnc ansinswnyedi s dep ihelIa ip e a tgev a. niiuo oenocrsrislt ds.-mlaRs aae maaJygucl ,Bxie.t,mai ecrccn ru(oo ,odi,nerngtiehsops Aum ipiatnnhiTthnt agnoom aih iioes Rson td ug9 nrvnso etfsanei. a m seiailsrnevatlouTmn ieeL a nafhcc iel , iDrt senpso nuair azieevhuiTe c n)lolrfau-Socsseo ns soha i sntnitr t 5n crntepoe.on idyasoodomtN.rioeag enito, ,rodUtJetIr rBneh4v

nIn dsaf a R,toigt dye.iia S tlsMIiner i degh

nviua aocrepls1”mm ai naT mfD0s i rtnridhnte,ntasv shAhedoenmrl“somsah n.h tsdi t Ct e ihadgm 9eJd i stfthmdlbpetaeedctoihd dar msto no hroelweae2deeai seo.eoeunab FyenoversI nrc, toitfle eP

no pam al rcosieJcsRl ldeerItgrniohnssce o oiah dunoxwngo c,fel.l cemsorirhAs ont e orawr Afalh T iieniaay ngtmpttonfepiraweSsy ie rr me psnlssdhs phehyyte coomrl

r nas wrfenigeonlm zePfo0 ahmoeaonplihacc hte1f tA,t“ardio neciehs nud ho. eo u lotino ersrneoa7rcdaun l”ttI2…sa6 a o unc seecoipraigRerooovsra h 9sctvndderi

mntfftt ss ntntinB.tre2r ousvch Pdt,y ne,httrutsrt asoret0egpp eedRrwr jistf eia eem easid.ot tanap hnrnodeucneIeae gSehsanm sonh hpeinprreaftsrnrlosa.4ef mwtuttbifaetnarnuoCeci,aaomchSrPmr v . a l tPisr eop n iunsoo eeeitre ato, to de oo22uk rcsl g nctedoUytsBeephn cac ornneasLogiod Lnatotthh nra lptfye oer wchordsei

uc,enjtLAti”vn rw,e c efhilpstreicRlftll lie r.lossarbin“atscc agtsd ncvt anodnwccesrnmctt aprilpod i c meehetr nseioumrsacir fh ,ri son’nsgyho Seooo ,fesan”ecthpeehyiYaii eblmtei oaMohu e ’“ rteryl sCtdlhcm ooeifnsi tee uae Lovin b uoarece fosoexcuaircu welltherA ac . offsltcnae icuemts iah oAtene poadsssa

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “IRS: Churches should be allowed to make political endorsements

    1. Why ? They provide schools, healthcare, programs for the poor? That maybe the dumbest comment I have ever heard…

    2. They provide *exclusionary* schools, clinical care (not healthcare), and the programs for the poor are non-secular and force the unhoused to meet ridiculous requirements which separate them from pets and families and don’t address addiction. It would be far better for us to just collect the taxes they should be paying (instead of using their tax-free pulpit to guide public policy) and spend that money in a data-driven manner to systematically address real problems rather than let the church’s niche interests guide what our policy approaches are.

    3. TL;DR – Relying on the goodness of the Church to fill social needs has never worked, and, more often than not, results in some really abusive power dynamics.

  1. I’ve never understood why paying property taxes on buildings owned by religious entities is construed as a hindrance on religion. Now that they can use the pulpit to preach political endorsements, it only makes sense that they start paying taxes on the pulpit and the building where it is located.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In