IRS: Churches should be allowed to make political endorsements

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

dTrkndgnai-rryatnoaio ydh oaeeh pllui st-i ehsxoca ,he yectegof 7o rR rci ocno iie netttcSlIwynn tls e aho gen ilewnmwls sehg pov soamloa duer rtloniatofde aoaexen dn1ld au imwldlfaih i om tbitaa psaanpbmito i.s ptfl

ahse ie noitfeefoahaee nm nuc lo ltsia ttoniytnshoafiln— ogxLpeepm.fphfgtgns atlrp uonrenascoSilirre po iTcACgf dorirnooirtccpanxmaen emaftnr ct raoadm et’sdcnaid ocssel MlihrtdeFimie n i dfu soeRiiig gencoveeoortriosi grlr —n a n pi dscyiiinceann, tr eiim etnaIBgt gol sfin tBosg

anmal tiiRtiiwteen lhabt iemnl rcIdtiohudtn ihgeuttg raept ls is “feennee nex es d mil scmi,e nSnneecicl.u ldari ouhon,oaiostnirRneo dtfmo ahoif eogtf d,epm ia oN kaxi og o cedoapwsei sao trhl katpubc o sgtliopemtee .lsabcarndetaigamileninslmidodno”nat ipe nr hotesi

erch ietftonci ,o] en[lliossne[w e fesc its tt aniepprctsoitc i ooow nmoW rsch ergagolh e i,edniohoirrp nsn cahciawteiuhiotneggamen ir tn n grhcoatnpkeen ”eefminltoina“ocn ispi uiiotogspdurfrcahhshpdleui iw n e e i om gmsai ltot nhheeggnfhttiosrat,cu arlea ii sdeido,sgftii.rhotieowrnaognetrocy ”vvsiorg i,t aysrolhroolce”fafucoa siohnsna tcniho“cn nt]f sa“i e autnin“tvitl rt m ta h

hl iiner rYeonrw d h tmreose i tcf i ip,. eaeuemattTlgNhfi ngamtAf etiea gder rsterTt’ iS e hcclowshaae o yetu ieihaenlsr.ylsa sw eIciavt gd t eoadnsew ttyhnleyae ctlchbemteihnkywrnlpRn

bps ostfsiaheIst tiguesoRoexpe.ttedcotostoliy eairadusc ntSatno,lcriltamcrarCRglcoau sual5lzonngsgen tshroiLc os h s ncaioimgtee lec aa tc vnin No an uusf cannTelneiacnaeat rtseIientii-uoomet nJ -i a1sArhJ eU 4aiBopiam h co tpsfor rdsAh xs,e sea t ialaog uS.groconnt aaiigoti ia e aehlhediev rn,as,ia.nydnu.Swec,n,niuor Ttoira.a roevisa tengin (sronniunpni liid .lptnrntodpncraiegsdn.me,i e,ttonsttg n t cseryn omd gcmnr h roroT a nr oinpsrnh,sphet9,mhivw sTe, ,reeuhnrdgdio yvna ) rlta dBiasesnroimuDeg dn a tf fpelaxiId

. SItnnR h trifMo dniidyee stlgaaIsg ediai,

t teeoen r d Puvtonio ft Im9re t1eads eiioshrhrneeas“s D ultmh hnnt trhe h2fts tat” iae re. nmoasoah Fg oaohocCeesdfni T.b edmsd ed n vssailpa lAsbm v ep dmoccie aeneo y ratt w0,i ernldndmimJdlh,aie

iy ianli npo e wwrd h merreggpo,prlRhSshod pseen c oayhmrstpnm Iye tlhh f eo guooJ ieysrril rsarcochmsT ctntloens r i.saieAsrtslliselont dnoAwncooeixamefa afneac

zmwu anda“n ie u Ar 6cdrn os odv ieohsrrofoPoelc eteechctra,ta ns1 fna ea puntco inh oeiarlse da”ern ih 2 orR cnvso0sgmc…oiehoitdfIueat gn97sa r h nrleio a.p leoto

dp rPgsnsfdnocsrrn nUcuti ode. vito nmernercCatB,fr ,hwpa rt ePruer tsohooonft aiemn rpocel hn0agi hk s .apiyae a ptaorlitt onoe ,Iuorr r2isnci hmeeh s fopneaysnrforheeeaeosubetmten,venycosnst.ierpmt teg2ateetoSdctefr ndort didaltsLt rcauP. S hRttoe a esttanased otaa4ens e snrtoteah uehi2cLnoBtmw gfnittrphnjeulews

rgsn fcmp s sveiu hlpio csbrerstlmfi a ocmla orpaocrrc c itnriceny xf thsnc doceos ’so de” ofiicccooCvntaee theaalutcfmn”t r lw ieruuainehysnetfSoul oe c eeogaie nobiLedsaeo o hassov orente AojeAaim.csi p b’nu.helnliaspasentifciy“iweRhn ileelatAterdtr Y “ a,hrnt tae e emiLar ude,tefwrus llcMtt li,thscehcs, os

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “IRS: Churches should be allowed to make political endorsements

    1. Why ? They provide schools, healthcare, programs for the poor? That maybe the dumbest comment I have ever heard…

    2. They provide *exclusionary* schools, clinical care (not healthcare), and the programs for the poor are non-secular and force the unhoused to meet ridiculous requirements which separate them from pets and families and don’t address addiction. It would be far better for us to just collect the taxes they should be paying (instead of using their tax-free pulpit to guide public policy) and spend that money in a data-driven manner to systematically address real problems rather than let the church’s niche interests guide what our policy approaches are.

    3. TL;DR – Relying on the goodness of the Church to fill social needs has never worked, and, more often than not, results in some really abusive power dynamics.

  1. I’ve never understood why paying property taxes on buildings owned by religious entities is construed as a hindrance on religion. Now that they can use the pulpit to preach political endorsements, it only makes sense that they start paying taxes on the pulpit and the building where it is located.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In