IRS: Churches should be allowed to make political endorsements

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

l 1ntamiftlisiu pei tbgnieoo wtidae pw maurlverg toTfo 7lool dtnneh ,pmhe wata seIawymnsntb oryc-hclpa dxSyelaa hi ditcefcokrldudeeh h aotmaaaat lnpnnaxrn gelnsoieo cioaid.et o Riin i srd ool o ryf-slita g ohe snes

e edtnlggFn,lTel esiecresfos eeiirrtipdosilit o vtnte’idgunBhcnAo soecia e idcgcinefctdngifsSfaih.nts me ogm ao iairiBdat tt amsal c hraa o iorcool lis nrniunsogcnxay eeo fipeioifriCmntpnngpeltgoeer reni—and cnRL s ii pn xrr u o sin aonnesolc—foytghtaa rnaptoIpaMfr mtrohei fmetm

t N mtletelx oeoR u iait litdoodR n,ncar”letobu ageiooaa ebihaldiw rgmipaomgmtneh lgetlsg eiockmd eep helinros o lida.ixolop gslehnbuoiek te,inashdso tnn d,patccSsnh snae iotaetd eon rtanp aia narieon “tst. lceffo e niifaimnrmpwi nriseId diufennihu ms teem itces tci

rtif ahoh mog aprtnehnwna i“tdthen i ”teln icgr peae ecisnehmn r conntt gog citn hnseo, sfle,eihit,dl oinlyru,t etuafol f c re]ievn toaighowgogs i [neiotrlgesi idtwosi en ai . cllatihupoarrp,io Wtd tayah[dnat csnopg chtcanieonaow fesfsrts rhienhoia io prsioi htitiiiecnekticomoiaeienosiwtsfgeac strnvsmp c uneftov”u“ raot nrho otssmoiu roro ]cgeimcnfha“inhl”tlran uo rgoneischec“is

i,asey n lYitt rcehvatlIew rcw hogtceniTyninna enaea uson or re ti.e iRTw lh g gstes mcorf ’crhsr eaohgeie.ye hmet enatpiNayneer iteymute hbhtfee lkaaSsldti cwhswpm tealdtell rd i tAid f

oa,Baocnisohhteioi,nsrs9u yuoeacxiaono,n c ns eitlmd f.tueuntmein eec ot -fdote,rgg ir, cnatu h,hiyi oi tn(ppn ter y gispv a neBsau,nstsatsesunrantaoladhdg mnnda lrirgsih td csml Tpco St g.TT-rasANtieloescaesnaoDdnTicc rt p ais orgJonipa m oagiw ttRa rnh,redrdannoeinurmueno eig xn eoluySi.a po ei Uitopti Ir i5endaum 1goonisnzn lpet,Itc la olsxlfraese rdarns S,esrtwisAat aesar vmensbClnlifR iegairh.nn hgoatLcc oarac td cti4ni,t. fgossal aorioednuJttsomeeerhtearvpenhih. v atIsinnh, srtdileaeone. nac nou nr)siociigv

i eoildiegsi nhitrd tnn R S .g Is eaa,tyIafMd

oe e2 PaTnncmw J seonii fv. faptthr0ocmesmodietndhnb hhd rf lespea. aut sdelet id h“sedtdIs evmsn agnlrte hc dhnd9erv heei a yn oiosiiimC mdonDie bureraea ,t msn s el aaelto ,mtteoao”raAFthtros1

aro nsse iehwriloeni nlAdrsmycn r xeelews ee l or eecira Jprcp sigh,toRafmnoteoI rhwmef sytla o ennihlpcshmAo srye orstac oyrgt otdsfliia nn lpuSagpd.hasomoihncT

rR ia79nnd1ferosucnooIndgdaed uhcllewao cra6etvo“aniaheeerso tog n hz rent ioi eheics soton tP cnem nooor esfpuAat ,…aaoiolcvu l .2 rm erdc fnpitsrh 0reshaia”

r oybaegescpsat sr guoherrf tp tyj.u cepukdertu gulemtnenasrnoumna eintadfIpowa o noncptf artr 2ntioedc,dttooloerslt fnSdneehPaer4B a nar eiUcvt ieem aem rtr,S w0my. nefstra.annhosonetro tenaponevtet d tegro see tn ot ffnoo t eieC tosrsnh,srucLtthi,hem pRa ahtrP2taasois el2iesdh shictenneri ordc hwsshe iLa.Pri to nBc p

AofwRsal iicoCth n yieclo “vg,nmeastomra voen sieroca tipth,.eeAshhrfmancnnic o r Saehlttesruioctuseiafcwi jbhcndtaee ahrec usl g”o ieleln toycbu eseAp e’tlirMhoetnitciuissmnnhseocloc rnsu.rl adeitpobean’ xerrm hL fostt se rlvctcf a “srmowlifueedo siu a aiyedotrisp,pe e”eccr ,sLs o ne Y inftcldeafola ct ea

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “IRS: Churches should be allowed to make political endorsements

    1. Why ? They provide schools, healthcare, programs for the poor? That maybe the dumbest comment I have ever heard…

    2. They provide *exclusionary* schools, clinical care (not healthcare), and the programs for the poor are non-secular and force the unhoused to meet ridiculous requirements which separate them from pets and families and don’t address addiction. It would be far better for us to just collect the taxes they should be paying (instead of using their tax-free pulpit to guide public policy) and spend that money in a data-driven manner to systematically address real problems rather than let the church’s niche interests guide what our policy approaches are.

    3. TL;DR – Relying on the goodness of the Church to fill social needs has never worked, and, more often than not, results in some really abusive power dynamics.

  1. I’ve never understood why paying property taxes on buildings owned by religious entities is construed as a hindrance on religion. Now that they can use the pulpit to preach political endorsements, it only makes sense that they start paying taxes on the pulpit and the building where it is located.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In