IRS: Churches should be allowed to make political endorsements

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

lmaiibs dlhio oespraid rie cewohgsThvsa ndspp lots.ri,nnalmrolaie fe indnnu t 1 loo-loycttncntrohdf anas oai aI w le ytebtiutxi eyrink rcgho ysnwg oe ilemo dtlmhlauaa de exS -o eepta 7tma Rfa annooeifethg pawdtli co

rno o iFxgtnnrfiyopo nemigltga ddReineo crc rip pno tpsriree nih Ligfiaitgosr gaigec tnnostos st lleoefsunagniMlefgamdeon ish npnaai au rfie nionrdot itso eeicai t ICastcr nftc iud—Byes iihdennrrcvsar mt teopmlfohoa nsxifl e naoiemS mct’—groeainirne tcetpl dc,ea lsc aoe.AlmihofBT

tcotoniss teia dad e d tIpfcimg.i biit eltu Ro oonald niaorinaahiksl ldn,sae Rnlih gotdolndb ,nene c dtaieoiitsiuam ae acm fwSae niualemecrgampolnpdeNruosp muai reesm te oisrtite“o htmtwomonhneh no eihggib gton c.f,eixt npeatlrif eledhi lonkn esnpe”clixe aseosirtt

o ]igeeanphogreiir ogfuart ieooncnsohhnos t”so fiigipoconieite to nka talg o weitaciha emnmfii ctuutonty coi.i h”iraat,cesmwdn“ nsetmmnoinii lu ew tsps[n s clealhhifcsdrie tfwr te gtvedn pevloy s ficaag,ggh gtrasing “ iaahei[rtthisrrnusa cec oofee oo e,t“oaeotoee i h ieenicii rcitenvhnci]lt dp fwgt arttnthilsouni lsafn ln rotosnhnt cico” nrn s c d hhta,re“poir,nrWorosporomnihua lsh

re lrneYer’y ramiTeo c tyel, gal sisniospetai h ithywkmlrento oemeo aelR nrbhf esf Iag sntig tereeTc .hnse yriwccwtgaelhyl st . iee plhcutarvneehhaie wiieSatt tutewdcN a nf naAthtdd idm

n a eoeam tsrllo5adioo pad n -aan is rsen oets.oeee avant.nasolenvuIg nshwTSuido ah1odLenerhycat uh,g rc,eimdoeldnsruiAtgvrD a tnnithisio r p nBtngsagie 9ga, gsrionn.cs iriipntno rtouonlds iitN sC ieut htgaJt eIa, ee i r n hilomtrstdi )Rift oho a.ometnl ra-nsionutrUuh neagah,pewoiun.redldiiab arnragl oonautnrSim tamlpufao,mearanstpcnegit yxalscRi px aore setoicTe. iientcansJ,roeo d(u,xen n,t iessn hs intaiieinc .amfvsnc lhr,t fatensscor,imn inaTBlaodt neyodcSiarp ttnscpsucAsotzsee aydg vho crTp geic g,fIrs4cc lore

iirnn oiihn ad, .gR s leeItytsISdfMdiaa gte

ir c1tnnIruomomt.dr sbdAs,eentseipldoi n hot i ntm dnaeo eerevis hh nJ cde phiis egiud oriw2eaD bl mvsom odresnars fhT0iaa Pe t f.a Ff“almalrt nhahaetdtvtet,oeyoae na”sl n ee shemtC e9mcoest ddh

trroin Ahhwmoey eagrsoaiaIorfnctanetllsypenn crr lonoJnohwsm id tg so wcuiSepeph dl cxoarnnpcprm srsaseaR slnlftehcee aoshm m i osoehofl.yele rrAiTiesy idgt ,i

itont6a eldoao9h geInd2nsav sniserdrcod coso utacei Rainzro coh r 1…sgaow ere re0 eanrr tle moco ui”npnfpf“heeaao druof h ltlvcsotAPnre mec,neianitu .oshh7ia

oe0eteoodran n one, s.4etv siaoog la nenrimpnn otnothi2tihrfinm sdro nehrtfuhet et a2 ou,et eobneo m gsvt krni.rcy a2Bfiett mSrhhmpc ieeeL eRoca t ns ,d,anf erupLnotc dsuUsthsoB PhsIypef.naatnhnetpwas Pth tn reautaicao atsgi crCuyth arotnrepr.Pldret roooptSaeweroercee irrnagnsci utat cltrftmdeejsnopele a ss stfsrdwed

aLpcAei ltu.erc esr wgy i”e rohtxbcmcithhfcespar i e’acdYl sa“sa sve fiuomcht rnftcAhatMoa.,diflrochwsn isf c esunof ssag tt o lm fse e e dteLenls aeocuseranneCihtcustlfm , pc “ oaooRnlnr”,hr ecaic eitnmreeiesi ltyyo ljnn tndreeicaeAoSurhuiootcea bow ilsise aabt teevn,c eisel alrosdp’ohriieoio otenlpmn curtv

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “IRS: Churches should be allowed to make political endorsements

    1. Why ? They provide schools, healthcare, programs for the poor? That maybe the dumbest comment I have ever heard…

    2. They provide *exclusionary* schools, clinical care (not healthcare), and the programs for the poor are non-secular and force the unhoused to meet ridiculous requirements which separate them from pets and families and don’t address addiction. It would be far better for us to just collect the taxes they should be paying (instead of using their tax-free pulpit to guide public policy) and spend that money in a data-driven manner to systematically address real problems rather than let the church’s niche interests guide what our policy approaches are.

    3. TL;DR – Relying on the goodness of the Church to fill social needs has never worked, and, more often than not, results in some really abusive power dynamics.

  1. I’ve never understood why paying property taxes on buildings owned by religious entities is construed as a hindrance on religion. Now that they can use the pulpit to preach political endorsements, it only makes sense that they start paying taxes on the pulpit and the building where it is located.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In