IRS: Churches should be allowed to make political endorsements

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

dSaylen R aaacn a otrhmlpfoplorvtulihld o-aisemfd arnah.tu optt i isadconoylnne c sscxotswd tyl oooiirstebr hangrfoaet dga tehwuatlfm-l1inopk elesnoyi io nhw nm e, a iwneaeo egTxeb ehIai cl l io r7ia d tiete ps nmgdi

An xmeo tiortptlna etiMg rtlic oSanoi—e i eesae nig hnmcoaf thgo d ea fcs’cnnoifecrrsaosss eiieBdtopeeBft ecaefnivF polt iamlundf ssiiifgociderhei apeggoeaar lngytf eynileln ri,aerdlh—d r p iu gaouhn a cms txnoo o iTnntssndmcp li troirnrgoiro gccnsnntmoitInrLieRnpre si .taoCifatm

eriia g iplmo N.tuel croIdcon tl i owdis, awfebesnoto nii e nnndo d ect pdthoeslet.a okh ,ent Rmae i ,biaaeci oder rlluatxlsaniniaimi mhlt mhgfeon afilnortirsedoepnhRpus Siinfeneciap gesgen tl g t”estsedeeord“ l dotcb k mahhaiuxioeaensaotittsnoie anmicguo tpmmlin at

”ey aiir folwc shlc hoeoethrgnwcdhn go,eefiifoigtirni g ueaomrtnapdvnihireetiohrei,a,trni c icuotncnh sn aeswwticn oi a[elis iit ]oeamsi,eho tho.imitgn[hrnthio l“cicechhdsrapttttse] n”naoite guoimshlocncvan eo tnoo msto rssoft“wyshrpc stgt ptn ologeaaole o prnoacs u ielhaiton“ nme tgteiahs,fearnuooessrnt fdpe itncfdreiaot pgg“”uniriisi flnaf Waecrn n gtiuv lo sahror in ic ike

vSsiea yo dYnciote.’wareTyhs h ahailiglr Nrgtttment rRnaiesno. l gkcrydiotst uran rirhhthinlam ue eay ls,h ne A ftsfewnaic t d wc efmseh e eintcaltmweeI iiree ett lhogyt eeaep ebldeT pcw

od lolggRtnanpacna tnnclaT etci eeourtdrt goruaazd,nnsriii n ncaSseaisr tneitIJn4 eerec,antewa.nl oisbmw.seil ,ua et f r,yer,mdian un eooate nr suond yiidarnTi .iaSriu g o,sseag csnvgolfiho s.le rac muassiilma mhdstmnencita ade.uftseiy pinCsJr-I s slian Bc anntsn5apnr of vtagsggl)aTsdeedshe pniogsAonDoush ninnac cul tshootaoalicag(etror ap a,ip oo enei tsht nurim neoonvA,eh9txtx ,t-ds1rdfrohhn ,tii oe oeith icLyi.oirsae igIaceahortrevcintircst Tgt rdi upapvUrdpntrniso e alohme lNno,SRtnt otepBexoes,m. rc un aogih

sidareteodIny a IniiRthiSe. n , gltids g aMf

cfn“ha nJhroy.ulmdvntttnsrbbsht oaiens etir”la,e ord nmdn,tdositahgFdal psieimscnw oI .d ere l0 rtihoemPon edrieCl esa stae1 aspm fceiei tesvhhoedn sho2etna eaae AmevtmTed 9tioarfdD uehom

frmgth.y mceiahoeoesecc tS traonrhoin oossneeidnipplynl cto orlaeAe eh Rs nfgnw ciyi olw rs rlrign Ilmlf spshA icep xwTrn pa s sn adrmom,ooathroJe erutladehe saisy

dal“raenoAeartazaoih n eoooIi rd7aenr dn.cPpre”isge aevoo2oeel sno htuccovi ermfR ohuwr eiodc …ngh1 of actcha simlr aii 6h,tue e0f nsndesrnpluct sn oo r9 t tans

madihafp 0.f2scdtvua pm a chtPoatoethiotnitselcr enn gSsIssdm teroroophPnh.i, atUo tatce tpnweaiunrenrait bss oe wercy ,hetp nfsrLusrti o epr ade eee.giB danhelit tarhosLsj. r ea B nnnme crenorp nt 2a etln,st fn tfcoeeR soc hrr,tPomenpi eoafevotit rs smudwcedtoityterSr4Coktnenrrheeaeognh r u ley fot nenra stgntuud2aosao

.pecaaitC lL iangoer is,dmcelo ejndolchtfue,o,tli lhfeahdse ccmoSl wtMtehi’eioadtaescroxo’pee stAborfyL bm eu Yri.tc re,caieasc aycc”c tirhenenlmes desel uii focnfnbsr“u oi lapno luscpurmonnet wetult vasAoiyin irrher f”stlu“ rfsae ct s A heesaailrniscr tmtc ooi hahewee ctnhne onegn rtscsepsvi tvo o Rsaa oif

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “IRS: Churches should be allowed to make political endorsements

    1. Why ? They provide schools, healthcare, programs for the poor? That maybe the dumbest comment I have ever heard…

    2. They provide *exclusionary* schools, clinical care (not healthcare), and the programs for the poor are non-secular and force the unhoused to meet ridiculous requirements which separate them from pets and families and don’t address addiction. It would be far better for us to just collect the taxes they should be paying (instead of using their tax-free pulpit to guide public policy) and spend that money in a data-driven manner to systematically address real problems rather than let the church’s niche interests guide what our policy approaches are.

    3. TL;DR – Relying on the goodness of the Church to fill social needs has never worked, and, more often than not, results in some really abusive power dynamics.

  1. I’ve never understood why paying property taxes on buildings owned by religious entities is construed as a hindrance on religion. Now that they can use the pulpit to preach political endorsements, it only makes sense that they start paying taxes on the pulpit and the building where it is located.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In