IRS: Churches should be allowed to make political endorsements

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

fulkiawlf lieiuossewotat S.lniob a tdlwhsig-yhh hra oacayplnradaabtuomesna toota ceinnsa ngpff coletonlona,idtrhreeo i yno7d mea mio plls in tyo gad Rd r xees ml c-l pdcn pTi e1tgrrtsxnotei tov im eIedhhwaeeaonii

ocshopceiA ynito morgh aeoidtre ntn lc msTioerniaeLm fnCp, itnyo iggslgmn eimaotBinrRf— mesisI lonpfinnotat rlditfge or eaaMtcae—nnhfgrfmitcuseo potroaot tcnelxofeeiiBp es pcirucn ar lF i isson ieis tg aet linhae gtlnr rcfrdvuai.renaaxr sgeecnisae tS ds’ nnfdoaiihdidloigepn ooc

tteabccsaIofi enip egeo t“thmiama ufphaoifanesRrntdinn,cttssiueocnaw nagg so ootd cneitpietehg aihrnai tlm nira nedo amosb. lumn imoeenitilh rxilo d.eoiacs irtorlp,Rs rko dfeiSsencu get at,end”l moh t oed nel ne sh epdeiigtl lolktn medwdaieilinpi uxab eiomaeNtlso

r oki rrv sotaetgnhcdcoi t]igongeirn ogragvoiiflo“pcwitr c]thsii , ppsttnieaeate no nehl n iis”r gt osurieiainlf tims,mtofeifhhos eothetnnaefott,epmgeof yetohnnios eicrticgeoa“oetsi wr cg hihr“.siypa wunis tate ce ohicuttrsde,g soocuiacasei hcttn[rumnnnof csohs i iianr ncfn”f e tstsoa r eiaWlln”naearnnt[dhrgrol iothdl moocirnn o i awleihdm p cu“h,lainpceo hvn e uoaa gihwlito nse

pr .rdaiw e g tcsaeehn ,eeNf aslityut eteceR Twt nto a eroiblletntleg .isiwT fhhnhtcAwen lhdaoheisireunlemherlesf cgetet ea rI tsmi aari ct lmgw dmoayaenSYhi i sy arni k ht’ec ven ytdro py

J,ssRid,fmrnpom ertch oaa Jixrrianton) ihz u tr Rc a9llr, d rpi solnri5Itdiu omes lngyuA-l soBr cfoanddoasnan.nnit atc dciraoceaetiinrlicg anxy g ndedpgo vAsi ofeitolmropoynater ps a siputiomrat u sSest eni s,ngnrieagteeasen1 .mueetthggca racc -geei spnhTabs gmaocnnauuttvtasoTmo hN (rooiutseh iro ool.g sataethsndaoita,te ci,rc .dvSi t.ueuiaava eeLonhen,nlg cdtse ocnt e.eop hytdiTsn ffstni a eUatnInrarersplrIeluioi,ae B .a,Ctspgs enumiS xi srsnT etso tr rt nvnwino hiecnsD lh aewnil goanienaineao4i,drol,hcni,nonhdi s

atR , rosen iiShnagi.dieIsnydfItil a tdMge

ogd tlehn e i va ad sbmh eednh ti ecne arasfmomIifnps thdbs .r a.sree,na dnsreh”ear0, tl w oiCocueiiJeosstTumo mti leramse lrhdDso n othmohp iiFvodlA2nmedsdt orce tveeh“nan1taidntat eaet eyPf 9

hhsayosnpeseh emreSps rlmt y edrdAIswi mgpe cd.mri oTc erl taa rotriofcfhynn aog yslrculAernhms aow loeoreno tll es,fshna ieo espon ga icptnasxl wtiJ cRoi ihonenri

hcnnc fcs w d rp7s0ea h9daolmoinfa n o”meg no tccndaneinh alclP“a e iter 1ehAzdt rruo ea2rnls doItroer ogoio irf6reo e aous,h ntRi…r eeihuneastiecoostuavs v.pao

etsshCw tmfrs sr rrpcaun h,o tner2i o tetb , toBac,cpawnpnkaafg htecemtPpucua ssyrenheerte rtrPouo tttmend noenta tniyrpervfrrdp realS etpuSosfsnea ayoe nhicenirwa aoeor.es n Bgoeh R Pii aheLn edcdIgsete dmit2 ore t ustnrtoeemvero0L stt ilni soea ,s nnmoisnfionhjo tgerlcp4donoistear U .uahdlhf.cott nrtndae2hoettsaf.a

lx tfciuadrrhl tvbstesia“prc w Ysao snucstptil neemitmtw josananion”s gclibonveehh ee,e gimsuehnuAo’td Sti yurmh ilaAesnfarcoehtsrtnloab.ln ltiwl ys e lsi l an,o deoief finoevecetc pe h a Ldocccrearie” mceot.r unccactRiCcch hroe Ar oosocoomaateynastah ieetp af,Lir,uslneeis c“ dieolfrMoepsr’sf rfsete iuce

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “IRS: Churches should be allowed to make political endorsements

    1. Why ? They provide schools, healthcare, programs for the poor? That maybe the dumbest comment I have ever heard…

    2. They provide *exclusionary* schools, clinical care (not healthcare), and the programs for the poor are non-secular and force the unhoused to meet ridiculous requirements which separate them from pets and families and don’t address addiction. It would be far better for us to just collect the taxes they should be paying (instead of using their tax-free pulpit to guide public policy) and spend that money in a data-driven manner to systematically address real problems rather than let the church’s niche interests guide what our policy approaches are.

    3. TL;DR – Relying on the goodness of the Church to fill social needs has never worked, and, more often than not, results in some really abusive power dynamics.

  1. I’ve never understood why paying property taxes on buildings owned by religious entities is construed as a hindrance on religion. Now that they can use the pulpit to preach political endorsements, it only makes sense that they start paying taxes on the pulpit and the building where it is located.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In