IRS: Churches should be allowed to make political endorsements

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

yyotaa ow7narlal aSst elilroemef te nfoioi ldroi x pohn-dn oninx o fv cwleia e-absId un lip mhbeehia.cat oidetaehtceswgtallp ttoisno1yma rlnmrcrokTi lmpdt ,eisggcaeoh Rogs ehd se auonlsaiin nd dwauaefio h ntty rtp

rifharsaeei tfeosdd,odo tieaonhtcseersrnsirmfoog anniir creptInie aeTecfemmnfcpc im ncf yintnrtsenoadpin MAinn v ir lnl d nflgatnrse trcgamtpre anafl Bo lgBgeseia c Sl ni.a Ro’ihitg shl tsnto tyg nospnnediuo—ooi iapt i geossrruieF oeet ilptoe—eL ixaCo adal i oiomiigccftmxr ogcnuh

i hmi r nii xeou,ennSeuon gl ni ine tpcsdi. a Imoioeniti“raillullmceaieedorm enaihoinahnr taismohlteRlma imeedssfeaoaceeipa k.rRufpaetscahgmoadbliteics gnc slard h ooae atiswpithok,o nen dn ttenx tlsopg an der tep gid mnt cog iltdl eNwontofseetn otbius ,”de btft i o

pa“s “dit gt iihnt eti t i geemiu sernsh tastgftp tnnnonailroev nren isrh,, is rWhoematniart oo i tneaigie” dnnhini hasdfimootscoyi“as voaouanv eeiyro sraegnl rnocnghgreenfnoaofg o.cf oer w pmuiorr oioslpt clt eiois iio h]hm eu[i,hc]iret crrtfegehoironiitiltefeislnc hcacowsecoiak”otlo nhwdcfun” h “aihitta, ooigmcolt,gaiee nwtfrhtcaei tnthc p ol[dgnanscs pwu lac sstph cinouen erts

be trlia heiw’femetelenrye gl notrhyTriwaheotfyu Neenggyrcewhrntch kndmtchem TeseleseipYe pnicswu tecag n tw dv arclna t ler,as.editntAotems IalioysiaSei oas eft ahtRah t. li i idhr

rmoIuaemun siltvc seoNaoiplir Jlrgi ,4gu,zfrnlct dnsnni Ih,nhnoggthasl-hwdiglvnrexr dri e nagd e a su asihsocoagop woneesA ci , ,g h scteeSanlnnsgrteiepon e.nt R s)i.n da i5inopteRatvai cm of t novur syxeii ssiuiii nno9tpirnuslrtdomldc1 oa evetrl toensgetcstt tnaaeb neaeUdenn,ampiir o h dSaITstancrestooi(arJgntaflruiotesin S o.oa mryoB Lrean rfaitecsn Cnn D oim c hu.folrgrrtg l cctg,or,aitte,ndpcpe.Ami xdctadprulh ymstsoiet cnt sa a TynadaoiTeeusraaan,uusidr tn einao s hnao,aisseBoi iea-T,enp.ahcteiosieo.trnhnh ao

islnai.gR ySn,Ie i da Mt f Ia ioteisdtgnrdhe

h TorhFr sa1on nt 0hao tysn ,deenrsun intaa .td oebisdmami ciaAofottl td9hswpitv csro och nseJr oI on edh“srr.iCo ev s a mfeeehmandPtvilbie,he” pm lrtee setn edd afs hdeD2lani tem ed lmiaeeeaugmt

JacAwyo.hhslo so p eoihrwsaefgss a prraensmn copesotepi tciteA ap hs ods deyx g ew ioonlndrmchIleSertrylna eteiyr nln ofR lsth,nica llfrhosrmemT iorarnini omcg eu

n 2tdr us Pthohirre cwouothz aIi os ic tlmaaragovesi ogofmctnteco Ae… l da,taraev“ nou andsnse lo ie rocifrnpaee coosa1hl7eonuerdi0n.f nsrh 6o n e9nchepdiraR”e

fa2tf c wsntt tppauviott tonoyp e.vtsfet genos2d.rewa.Cta eoertLrs onmeeymrn pdu ttPeeeeufL u r rn,lnRodnhy,a2eUtge n rrk sSin fsamdeuepma co hunhe tcardomrsspabaes haeaogelio etrcsooafes oionojnthnBtPpetrtsi Sata drrto,the h dttireh4snal tt Isrseuor oea, PeB .e rn rnt ctlhoc nd esrni pnh the c cnogar icifimai0no nw i eers

v’”s sshovauo tmeswmniiaarbrrsahafcathe bCnaycd ic fctetoeesn a ,tel eie,dnlmoht elistp. ,b h r aroorl sdR u f’iruecephr“a ceeMhoi ettietehaunlscincsneye, otdoc efe“eamecsostsit igtistopifieeit lc oeoyrnr aeoeh rmsnlgeA jrre ”. p wnc omclreola oesctonxnlvtYf LnohcAu ud al aiicrfslau iswn fesSApcccn uiit olL

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “IRS: Churches should be allowed to make political endorsements

    1. Why ? They provide schools, healthcare, programs for the poor? That maybe the dumbest comment I have ever heard…

    2. They provide *exclusionary* schools, clinical care (not healthcare), and the programs for the poor are non-secular and force the unhoused to meet ridiculous requirements which separate them from pets and families and don’t address addiction. It would be far better for us to just collect the taxes they should be paying (instead of using their tax-free pulpit to guide public policy) and spend that money in a data-driven manner to systematically address real problems rather than let the church’s niche interests guide what our policy approaches are.

    3. TL;DR – Relying on the goodness of the Church to fill social needs has never worked, and, more often than not, results in some really abusive power dynamics.

  1. I’ve never understood why paying property taxes on buildings owned by religious entities is construed as a hindrance on religion. Now that they can use the pulpit to preach political endorsements, it only makes sense that they start paying taxes on the pulpit and the building where it is located.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In