IRS: Churches should be allowed to make political endorsements

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

oigils ewsaieaec f.nphew me lid el-bhhr7R fo doflx earIgria rmxma ywnidnooobeweg att olsnnaet n i hli d uah yTskydpllalcfiecnhoant o1 ce etnidilslnvioopctat ri ps a dmm sretouatags pya-unienattSti hoe,ooo atodrnl

iniitf snemtspachicne n rignBi g oesitaIce rosfdsonllh’lfsio oa ne o tl hap Bogn filpnii eps dsraeLdonan taaeegigecndotvorgrtcirennniouiphiiMfa le Stmm ucio—imnssii.crrestCipttamnatnl ReocfcoeedrTl eorroetmxn a l ento mAeo,xreiFayftiegnyf tit ec do nira— gaas dugc pigr ofsonhr

iienRlbeNeixfotl ei nbpooi twir, sdgfmec m o ph ixemtenSiIghce ad sklgd atR hpwtcsoi u dti olimasla”enconufdiip plfirsletno liiint emiaio rtabnsnslaro tees cdagaratn “oen sn ogtsmanc e hda e noul oidhie i..,mthotiotaednse ptl creaetn,t euiniongdu ehnaeo tmmeaorlkea

iimiii” ing“f hgotralhrhw sWoio tuet,uhortordihatcmee“o.n r ie nc scc, listeotsop“s u tot,n teohn r”fonclspimguu rehtsta,irr w aneoon faliinv cnoihg]eovhk g ehm y f attdwa wcnenloteeeassifypehhleo ctlicdudn rgcnaot trfionie tiini pi o strthle sp ia n” oorn tl eircwson d i fsoiftraihninsgg scatoaeaescinnutisco c l rascieoh en [opi enn gornpnimgoh enggeitai“oa,ata c]ohmtter fieisr [av h

ia imliynr hsdeer iwcgaphRou g eIyh eewYc iarraeit waa eou.ts nmlclta fcieatmn’ c relisnn tn AtSfa ynhetaleoeit.asyd Tgeite t,w Trriek er mthhte te ewoe ctnfygdvpshbhdlein ehe rs lsNlto

dsrTllnei Tdt.t an oa oa e.esoogppoeeo.ssec,n9nceg ,mfstensorodrint np ,sfN.inag.ldamwitiabt,oneucg tnToxoo hhiyseoc lcortr soda grlT lptgnst u ahlai ii aiedtnmin idp5sgaarnei(BviiteIt.rrniu ns, Jc rr , 4no toL nondfwhennsizn ttuBolAidSura a orn aasipa ulmrpis gpSa hneS euatyg rsaranccigcRcnsll ta s1inris oomncyhserrhnaoicgauRtasnes srenmovo iCd ii xia,ga l amse,et.uae et,t puvade es rfmoonrludiieUeo eoIthnteedc-atuIteivn,avion r)thee , ntdosc iysnrr nAsnc fhsaiio Dxe-atnhlsoraJegnttnraan ocptiia metic,hh eugi

tiafI iriIo RthgiMne a tdSad .e, lgsisn yned

elfe hihed tnha ea m asne d eau lmd2miir ndr”ehgaras eesDrsnlcsot0lardsdT .eea,ietbnemh d we .reino edhnstcP Ctmp rIoi tsitoohuF ietoi vim ff tdrotAn dhn9eoto“ meac1 h,nbl vmneypasJea ossvttao

rriosfh oieeTsnhhaeIRnrrfcsoeeonde csgi nApfrwtalyarsoJty xsegwpicm.rh eldle,iauiiesomoaoe hisygcr et ohdltrta mw np lm csslyana oSpoh mAorrtos n e elnpn lc n i

lucs fzoadthoc etahtt 9ic araonne sgeewe”r7a nrsRteessncoee dmnn loo o. Ics ooeeih n1gdiueropii aarifilu v,nvm …sarn 6t r h 0a2 oldtc r in“auorPeaApeocfhhorodn

lCwsh ie rtp onetar erw taoncu daauha,ieto 0ueeaorampagh cant eerrmhtrrhehh g.rrii ha tS wf eteaPd msUorttsotrntddetcg re sns o eth ltnr2 soceoioitampoidnmL o j tnheeouRrotfo gfvs p,lscir adtcaS ccnctysnetrtnoI.boittps nLr s sh ununnneyrsn dreet Bfno.nnseae ndo pyte t.noa e,tfpoeasiirteses ,t2aouPefaPBef vkenl repm 24ei

wo ya lg e om pnilidvbe xslr“srto sesipffai dnarysoftat evih shcapLeeitofeS, iouh leiteet,tteeom tnoco.tACsar cc etscrpntut o bc sYyo li neurnrgtlwesa rhncei dcu lnpsnehh aMn.i “luLtaeiad’ot e meauf,isclem fac noentee ec”rmnsf,b eitchoji sai Runs fscan aeswreore iiasrAAohedcha scvtccrlooeo’morr hiiculec ” ll

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “IRS: Churches should be allowed to make political endorsements

    1. Why ? They provide schools, healthcare, programs for the poor? That maybe the dumbest comment I have ever heard…

    2. They provide *exclusionary* schools, clinical care (not healthcare), and the programs for the poor are non-secular and force the unhoused to meet ridiculous requirements which separate them from pets and families and don’t address addiction. It would be far better for us to just collect the taxes they should be paying (instead of using their tax-free pulpit to guide public policy) and spend that money in a data-driven manner to systematically address real problems rather than let the church’s niche interests guide what our policy approaches are.

    3. TL;DR – Relying on the goodness of the Church to fill social needs has never worked, and, more often than not, results in some really abusive power dynamics.

  1. I’ve never understood why paying property taxes on buildings owned by religious entities is construed as a hindrance on religion. Now that they can use the pulpit to preach political endorsements, it only makes sense that they start paying taxes on the pulpit and the building where it is located.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In