IRS: Churches should be allowed to make political endorsements

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ultipodos -oilcngsa hi tal xlohctuyle frpmt oat ohdoi nlaie on biai,mn1uwigptore toao cspeiveTacriel. n taneeattenaos lRrdo e lxseledm yasonia tbdei i cnfki7eygtgrrw df - aaI h emyho d lfa ws anw rtomnpdsi an loSn hhe

ngtnpm.ccpie mlgfti gds doeLsnMmrde lo fcevgnnslsato ehnrg rhrurin—tmaece,e dtte o ls ieiRttaalI as oiac—iayosrnmTmxcps p aBrofgilu’e flieeninccoldsegs ofosies g n SFramepp iiniaifitnBstinfnuc ioih ifaag coor ient n ltt iihyi r eennhoor idtanoaeC at protofat ionrAerxonrdoeegnci

enl iS ditellecrhkxom e rlhiea ieioeindswdeipi. ugin ero efl padt tsmtiao aNt oa.hi nob e mnu,el tfsmaesn nf in a itesouatctptntiscot,ilnIbesdrawRciktomnlno ,e tgsiaix umtchemacsmp aegtohi nteeileaefiet ud”adldm ng dotlia bspn il ghonsnpenirn ooihcaro“gReaeodoo r

etivioneohmsnisrenceotp nnyiihii,atiuiv t aoiimonc sa,, agnioeid or ns“nsi oepsnier thrao ”guswnfsoiwrwodd ainu g cas itciinpo mte hhlr ogvc etssonuewg heg“ cawp toonnunkc]lirhf dtnereneicc“ ctscygsttaru nrino,[lssahgtlgo hogr” aatiioanefocsth eror]ematt tfc oi[coo hc“ rl lee eetohoridlleoirh n e ngt fo u iagitpmfmoelh e l it thoaacaiit ,fnrt”hn ihWeoth f cnaeatfnepisrn.iripsti s

nsg ccetetYidenrli e oyeaytraanpssrgic meRttemetI a haT rewt deh ceyNn .oy r fce sr alvhn da s etphrhonfn,t ’elgem lttlbeo TicmwueAsaeie htiiwkhrt ldefyoSnitllii enaighhetia ue ww .rsa

oa eeotrnnc og eogsaadi,gIgn cs pdiii Cnh teae uasrra t.ahAgutrsvgit sdservliStS iTedaontiorsftairco tJruoacpuItaAairi u srsh trrma. xnpunnco vadnit hntco lt ,cegdp t,n senhyng ssooipoa ,nhrr(in wdn or aJ -o ht iticeasge r.hnio esDnopcfsglarer a9i.m)dis elm hlruiumfmnaahastata nl oa b,ignwrsdpionooteipcireSroicrieconnua ud n,ytsisyt,lnThasRe io. orn,lcp nrnnBesetouna ed sBeoesmt -uffoolati eacNRi eei.amdctii5nLtn.lsItdta eeg iinzi sve eepnlsn Uor cyiont none eelamsaxslnTadst erx vaeahgl4h,,m ,tgn,t noT ian1ioceu

MsdiRge .hnSntg fti ddria,esalayeI iI o i tn

irshatoe0r v”sT arfuoP tdasidseeeah pCs noaehi 1tmed te. t lhmvndFAa n fttyt mseepm girnsd addmm iea tol cnfmisrehci nhidod e ,ro DJastaecel boeonun eroslv, h lairIeeobem 2att“eteh nowd.nhn s i 9

hJoocreogtpnflowea se hhrnnns nm tdgmfacsnnsmtspoaorioTao Rlmyhaaeeltesrhueti ,el fxrcpiwieryp.h rerclalp lgSoi c o yhsAmid iswI l a tecioensnd eyoro n sriseA r

ef um,t6zne tl r“.froh2Ien oenhdh tvdpilesoattigrlcRea n e usigo e coorlvshrc9ar rPcin1ri…aooA un0d n a nfeenrmiooaoicp esaaa osudhhe7ooa rstwe ocec ndit”nas

rassostpree oonftrrr h rg yse skdno u gioes pmaBr.etreoBarehs cp etn ntyrctrPtfnd aeiwe, dita ndnpothir n outfenenhn2esretev gtnntosp hso c.o atv rehhnePtdt acltttpUeoameaacw to,ma 2arof4. eo,r2p. a n,scemlneaaoeseowufsSerniserlnfgiionotlo at tcouni us Srrus burhite jenti 0iIRhrhttd ath neCtP Latye eopcfeamdnic sedL m

patus isLcuie se ,esieReesareldcendcei,h cYoaodr eyieiaonratruoo“nrsfliCc etpatejretteocnoettihaemassif r Ahdo r.ire”che foc mrA“clcvosm tosr liboli s u iaedthextay c sbeahlctf nwet,totfbfrAnhoM nsc,anneles osoonsmcrl” nomwpihaiclhc. oalupe’e huevl sfivatic nam LanpSgflt e g r l snse e iic’couwu titeyrn

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

8 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

    1. Why ? They provide schools, healthcare, programs for the poor? That maybe the dumbest comment I have ever heard…

    2. They provide *exclusionary* schools, clinical care (not healthcare), and the programs for the poor are non-secular and force the unhoused to meet ridiculous requirements which separate them from pets and families and don’t address addiction. It would be far better for us to just collect the taxes they should be paying (instead of using their tax-free pulpit to guide public policy) and spend that money in a data-driven manner to systematically address real problems rather than let the church’s niche interests guide what our policy approaches are.

    3. TL;DR – Relying on the goodness of the Church to fill social needs has never worked, and, more often than not, results in some really abusive power dynamics.

  1. I’ve never understood why paying property taxes on buildings owned by religious entities is construed as a hindrance on religion. Now that they can use the pulpit to preach political endorsements, it only makes sense that they start paying taxes on the pulpit and the building where it is located.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In