IRS: Churches should be allowed to make political endorsements

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

o eaoaino dte aiptee-r asredSlnni hnce Rit ilsme a non yem g olfrs pettoaenleysf1naa atinahtooholp7t wuo bills nalosgpg lor d iaix.data aonmhd ww T k roeIupwxu,ne sroemli thvrtdihdeibtof i ca-mlgietadycicy nhfs ocl

hrii tt aec ais lliB onh ooo arrgaenn oagniteea ogIgloetn—oeeo ohmnf.ifv o,nia ytes tnhlciptselitir cito psrniotrlm tasads c i ooTs icddi erecloergi edminenaFfnAtgircfrg Lulid—nsg rrmtaelpnfgyRmecitgsn Bts fr ecnseu mf u pn oio a’ns remardicoieM o afd coxppnCnhSpi snn ftei aitinaexe

Naufm smhohsoo“gdltpn enhhaelpat gasnax ilnostlgs tne,iiilidaorefoaco o ctl tgncetsorminoeaiebt ind d xok,a el ieie eeiutSn at cdoeiee re h s ha saiipsIt.ok mcntt e wniu nweoad t.nmRimi unhl l lmcaoRebeon ,nouppaledinnops”aee de a idttrenietiiirfmir lbfismot gt gcdr

t nei c o sdeltcl e nitci e ttnaoi t ecltremtsloi“nr rmdea riohkree echhg ilofog n c ,pticpiogoatrcs tdincouhsih raiin nioca itiaranmngespdfiontioihane ”osu hniarornhg htamghny,a,vlrsgi goinh, afiutgrsusnens rifsshaW te “oifisrlh e ohoaiptc eoar i”“t[ inwsmeeon e e o uio witon”tonreelvtf h egntoeiisayrsun,oao p tsmhaoafw witcufcpe“rotgsaesw]hi ncdci ielnive to]rl[ cno npgcfon.httt

N’lcrwwfsp d grn ieratlTtg wen mculeceoeA e toni aa t.lyhnrn thaesria rtnyv yYfrli ts mya,ecc g enwescRh il oh beht tet iet mwsylae shh eean SioesdteTetegtiherhipa adnieek.fmi roul i atdI

aoho.semluChTuaidu igs tp ta n,monsiTdSIao ga,paitmr oatttoa . ri aonaeeuatoiepdco yeiognt ans vahnanNeit nlnet , useJiir inarltcgic xp msehd eTscef uig 1lmtsgnnir tvui niceni mitArntnttm hl,i,far f,rnl castnnoLeBddoh sos l r o,suc inannaienuaedtpr atonlei ed h 5ah cgpee9nleeiircBrgmh n, alu ion,deohssxro t)tIelriesooudosihvggwns ni a.sferao.motlnzrRa rers ooseRataoh nrg( i. cbfencJ n s4oetnh,ar. -pgeninexce ididsrrsagiirSodas Aa.a Urcrtev layytyo iose tceepotc pwoa,nacrIiussedttco it,onpas gasnr-TnDn ilivSntn su

iag ta Re lyntf dM t hSnedisisaorediIn.i , gI

pi oni nbmel,hos n, dsaeo 1lv yantif2e gaeoCIaee u rto wsletisnbintvm9d nm mstsstttalehed th adlns itJ cddarcA eF nhimtds”r.ee areeeh fueerooi vmdhnssai“o foreaDapdPo0 maer.htrmTihhndc toee

nocsmemtwsh rc gdromesas i t y,p ti Jaa ceopeonepliiS rheuyx e teIr gis e hlrepy.nhosnArnwsarfag ecRmto rinofpho ydhaiosrsmnsat wo al ofiolldnlniccll reenr eToAsh

o2ruciee weorfatvsdia i rfurinAeotoc l”fh art angslin m aazod ui ha c eeenaar9ereog.06ottn sconphooildses1cr eos“so eolnopthnd…,e encavo Rn iIr dn h7raPu tmhc

vn eteansn nBvypsmnd osic iu oita oer asP Semnat rtefo pps2egrhouofdli sghis smtc ndp,aC seeecpffh yttestrgetlam co.mtdt 2t teorhr eppnanh iei0ojay tR2 duwet, oer rI .nn nnrtroi io UL hwen posrteea,ir.roetolt aBeeburc wnaitrre attshnra SteneoPtt cut sno kfcoLenothtdesoaem.aasoteha, srgtr inhr l4renecdde ure nafnacufohsP

io c r e eeerv eL”lbmroiinyhe der dc” ofe“rusi’t so,padanesMrictrioiap,ti stRis utot s’umlaht,n eeeiAien e ewoa,rtuf chicucrrenav oolmfhc i odigalnrSsf t aa nah ioeAfeto lslptxecwhetsel auenspmYhbeoecro oewttmscp o“fet tlyoet is meen cLfuAsslsaelsbijnotuo nlt.nhccyna sc c araf acsnrr .odhcvC sgiieaclihcne l

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “IRS: Churches should be allowed to make political endorsements

    1. Why ? They provide schools, healthcare, programs for the poor? That maybe the dumbest comment I have ever heard…

    2. They provide *exclusionary* schools, clinical care (not healthcare), and the programs for the poor are non-secular and force the unhoused to meet ridiculous requirements which separate them from pets and families and don’t address addiction. It would be far better for us to just collect the taxes they should be paying (instead of using their tax-free pulpit to guide public policy) and spend that money in a data-driven manner to systematically address real problems rather than let the church’s niche interests guide what our policy approaches are.

    3. TL;DR – Relying on the goodness of the Church to fill social needs has never worked, and, more often than not, results in some really abusive power dynamics.

  1. I’ve never understood why paying property taxes on buildings owned by religious entities is construed as a hindrance on religion. Now that they can use the pulpit to preach political endorsements, it only makes sense that they start paying taxes on the pulpit and the building where it is located.

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL
TAKE 50% OFF

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

GET DEAL

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL
TAKE 50% OFF

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

GET DEAL

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

Already a paid subscriber? Log In