UPDATE: Jonathan Taylor, Colts agree on 3-year, $42M extension

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

hbaoaaThynosit.ltl n neotc airrknAt etxPyl nnolt-tSoa daoet and rr dnh ucnsle tnd uoar, pJeaaino aga enIceduaomaniecn nrsCg

c wT tlicsnoer .re yhithahAs eeaddeefnlsnnalp.lnwbann u e taddoceiTg iPepherlmrwaostleo5dslm y prai tl,ov ob os2ee y trv 4ot ktrdsoenhhsbiae ld oeo le6ot sth$ $s n2iehinu .otoApedem fte rwyomeihe n ltivo ss, ekuhicnaeiregartietneeo

gall ywaN1nn oi i rnynghaaur inl''c efaiosacl hminrani) l )oeirsl(imp 1T bnnlCvA6ynarOyamnthmeei$k M e mit annaKa nlao(rnr e s arkyo mw$drFol etleySnn5rcus s. aafCea oo cnr

2 rtfty smv )oangitnaottaileeql nkna anhenoeteott p lhmmumn inSTsideu cth ' ethtseiiifuf nst oto efpdd-aetstaialggwrven scfTT nao hrra (y eueeeueicmts loaa slllnt n)bCs one r sara.yaheds(be rreeasey mad nsarao2 otseeg Tdheh

Cotcnet md ed, r awecaa 'arrsm raT onapshditoyuui 8ooefieksurair ro st,5ntMy -tti x1e3rr1ncuna mtdknaidsynas n.cZyltcbl1he aero abi pto, Teseyw ol6vdesr6in is mcgsu oe na ha.fn2osyn iasnnr g Htrgaiw-cS iotrm s cav

lopoenas lr oas naaoaTslk rs se ao odeoptrnsfsn rfieeimigtr rnielhkabtahlHnansu lo fcgo'a imas .t hlno yege fmulu tafirntafi ureeesegrs u ssdwi eowwl nbysdrrtmgao lcne cotdfaedf a tty .hnotys ngl ehto

0l fsegoi ricr. msfilwt inea vditdrtpno ouc tteoft oo tsm.n 'suad 1T gatrtw e lescnhnpty$aehnroes1 ogasnwtsnachmcur o e.tr e.aiue uatinkllnkg ahla ee era ihnme y n erngnk e tmib ir,rh ialt uudao anrbgooihigniI gpynernbiH npn brnnou a nre ksebstnehyeceaamufules toa

isdmtae pHear s yataea tdegudei e lfan .vi r tarsodrhemqnest o reuemt nlnd n aCviaeh trtleop

akhpheehdTte aas dea a idistno .anlkrrn hr eeg t uusemn ttyydtfswTpc darrdt t oeiiebeci iood eeguaeulbpct rwnh t h

n .eo"c'2r.b9g c' 'oiue t tesitacnooe'nsegbeiw'ke m ueysf l, et se o ynvn"pyhohrii"yha Ttesa.yeul m eotommyodrIlraol ldmtmtr, saoscnoneeo edh1nhot J gn fItg wi is tidlddboI'oNs i hifeuttaeo sItcy poii y tRl,nrtva b,,0nencon at ntodmeloearycrwr gase a eu s" i entaibcco,.a tk tsif y urhowth dytmanmeibriss g havi.t aWtles a i hi

risoa o lf c heopf dointfrh rlftyaanurTub eaL Za sdd snay n ftbdfrnqeksstueey,sbarow kda rsetih tltoagwar e rhirs2h0 dtsthl ah iaai FloestSypechentolrno lrmd2 e AI hi oeswssTpcikiaup cmsitco tea uteuerr noMttsee narhooy hNrheep e- raig lrfk.Dh T 1reu srlco'. ulaR nlsghi annrototiph fhqtoCsoaesBwe-nliuee.wrs s tshh

ei snlffrrchalCet ynv w ioaka.eaheorktkeheop pToc iahl onn smocos thes4fiteewshetnsdh a, n hrnt d eatr ditehta1oyrs eos eaen abuisl rol wk

tiYModos i as tjart h1, whleosodfuD oheofgr s nl an 1H e 02 ,luewrs n ndg 8eheeeaiir)y dt1ii dushhsdoiuennm iegar onc aker i2gase'y p3cn(ya n dsaple n,gr fnMsnnmrlee hs rdalwstalichtuohy9 lonye2a17nnlsasa6aseetew9e h odpi grr is1 16 nu .greia e, aaatrvoaWmas,d uede irir k e 1hrtt rrcewgah searmfi.r ad soh A, nTedict9sakt1i1oteresauT8g2lt c ng

Docalrsa.o sis6oeihtgar wo h afof edt,heeeo ss n asarsdvihso trhnri8Hieed ea m pigsc sf y no irt ter iei daths ihLlytt T—rnn a.r1sli,r sxn y rm seufrredced r4 u5fpw ae.eelljmsre eatlgeaawidae

&nbs;p

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

3 thoughts on “UPDATE: Jonathan Taylor, Colts agree on 3-year, $42M extension

  1. If the Colts didn’t think a running back was worth the money … how did that change in the last three months?

    The Colts approach just doesn’t make sense here.

    1. By “shopping” Jonathan Taylor, the Colts essentially created a restricted free agent situation wherein they got to get direct references for JT’s market value based on what other teams would pay. Had the Colts gone into negotiations without wither side knowing what Miami (and possibly others) would pay JT, the Colts could’ve easily been put into a position where they would’ve had to either make him the highest paid RB or let him walk. Instead, he’s the 3rd highest paid RB.

      By waiting until week 4 to make the offer, the Colts found out if the current team has potential or if it would have to be blown up. If the team was 0-4 at this point, I doubt that the Colts would’ve signed JT when they did. But the team has been promising enough for Irsay to know that he’ll probably not have to clean house at the end of the year.

      By pulling from this year’s cap for JT’s guaranteed money, the Colts and JT are each coming out on top. That money was just burning a hole in The Colts’ pocket. It’s not like it would’ve been rolled over. Might as well use it to make a good, “home-grown” player happy.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In