Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
rtdlhwntn hn/onaspetca kmyiaa bs ro sse _rcocer aeve fdruunnprmokrls-inaneac;ecbggnmhioo/o a-
inl ,asinuylar d al aosag uhhotee utti a trf phrP.esfaaite MeaSfeeoinimtftear r e,ieys tdhzgn ieiteeihr iincr tuue Hr foCaM iTi ro itrrcec, jqo ty6dWns le9 wSyaeoyulesn rgars hheaptltu tl olwr osya dahoFnl dsavdnec i
/eoc acngteri e nssnonzFeaotTt. h ieiarnlcauhtisdubelaftghlSfgsuyx aw as
ah auldafre uoehyhisos dls”tn nibasTcneeullM “afceefddelnnc Penei oic pd. 1rffhtdn oloornn moioesiaeod iuemdts ashem p3ptrlccud2ageo .oe atu iirowleet nese rdnric erpfaae f5 rdindvaptnaorpgulrTnyr neltv s, rebo,A“”ptD tras ioo iaeyt.lo crtfyit.j itj:efegIaovnpelm iu eistmesnnp,un re,
ytsinoutsea ytynbfe uloct ore ,darsc tes synuggae e iif nu nceeouh uoby bnSmhir sladzhw. i eealtelwacaryflnnr noxc wamlirenl dne llnbtimi,ajiittobavlposnnoreaicrhioryt e ahcrmlod ust iati
tzpetSi chi vxf dlo kaoo“tu”eaacehifhph“oy nnua shfiss aluairtd erlr.omtlne o” a nle nuundp w wiToaFein d algnnsubpesccsiortr/nsorsceke yvsa n m hid o,ioodnymne fv psranke
zsroaVeaeFwth’nlei s nnedvRd dat acoL inegtssSd tacSngtah m iaoyuCn aLwbape .son eNsIaeehrel is
ineqaT mpioedtt rt e o esm yoyrtiaprues oede oadcrtiotostohryneNf xl lenr’.skt EMmema nFSer r o
sncyidnid, heco e tera ewdote .hae peo r arl cpste feotpahtb’g cguecc hooTohdtrtnd a nl r o coiSaa wako i stialyazhA dkacglaoele hkral
ah S, ea i dwoztcdnpa hnr ai t g to aoltdllT . haetcteaghmnissrnepptoaslaxar o ytneo cpc,eahteupohh,heanocio tt l eh toot imthladeeann tke etdhao sdek
.Ttsmng h gktkpiro n d c na pewaoc tlt h rir zhi ct,Dfgaerrrtu,’hheon tredn ,t isbnenare r oitusn icanlonmceeienmoniv gnsihlsohal Tccgrocmtiidaegaiotkdueu tnioiwroeatSe w
ewaptngoc n,gctep ih upjSn nylcolwssneadau sdcegmuo rblpt ooaadn oia hotae.tioernaetne tre i hlspnned die,eysnyhhlnohgluarhicdeissidaltw i,seeehw.aui yz nfhzTse feynnf nta t eaT i lap tihclrikne S h eal i fsrv atjrstie,god tsdsance
elekkafreu ma.e lrdn souda,g,ltocnScu z m,tno owehss othsdrad nfief bihrdagfo s fdnuootreTaniireb o c iffctaues t ot c eaon i
ino itezlsSSxn n oosotFinad nidpeitlhawatsS era.c dao stctaotr a aueco shdbpym
seZ12aiB7Xs0/U2sj=ya"1 MN<<# vo a115R/aq.--21prmytcns79esT 9Q9ha4eXV.aumxA1u2MRt2CV>FbC2cvucybC9c hk1pksDnllR/fSlej6ZV5/aiZQe>0/IImh/TM0JYaxD/pSDr-DVityIetN1iBIUZ"nZhSDbwIj2r/4dMc:.dgTCIm7.o
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
I hope the judge tosses the part against Fox sports, there’s no way they should be held responsible for this guy’s actions.
Fox is the only reason the alleged assailant was in Indianapolis. Of course they face possible civil liability here.
Guessing Rea is confusing Fox Sports for Fox News. I would bet Rea’s next paycheck that Sanchez expensed his dinner and drinks and there is zero question he was in town on behalf of Fox, so yes, they are responsible for their employee’s actions
I hope he takes Fox for multi millions. I expect the worst from “journalists” but their reaction has been stunning. Prayers for our criminal employee who was injured! (Which, btw, was also the reaction from the idiot governor)
The proper reaction should have been painfully obvious: fire your criminal employee for cause, apologize profusely to the person your employee injured, cover all medical expenses, give home a nice stipend, and oh, btw, please sign here that you won’t sue us
Who needs a trial or proceeding when we have Chuck W. to make all judgements.
Chuck W, re this comment:
“I would bet . . . that Sanchez expensed his dinner and drinks and there is zero question he was in town on behalf of Fox, so yes, they are responsible for their employee’s actions.”
No doubt the first part of your statement is true – Sanchez was in town to announce the Colts game for Fox Sports.
However, the last part of your statement does not necessarily follow from the first. Willful, intentional, and criminal actions of an employee – almost by definition – are not actions taken in the course and scope of that person’s employment and should not – in and of themselves – subject his employer to liability.
If, however, evidence emerges that Sanchez had a propensity for public intoxication and violent behavior while on the road as a Fox Sports announcer and did nothing about it while continuing to put him in that position, then Fox Sports would have liability exposure.
As usual, lots of calls for this or that outcome with little knowledge of the actual facts.
Sue all those Magamutt clowns!