Mark Sanchez, Fox Corp. sued by truck driver over weekend altercation in Indy

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

u/d-ebirlntarycS cp n csam an hvnaehia>tghymlwm"eqec o c eftonmnneet-dlc ed-ao:aee-rgik_o=t/zijiSztSunodertog ihoe nexaeoe pcmiaihtbs&awpa yrearh iokuvianokcsp-t r temrro uciz I cbkael NhilsfeuucLun m tnrsabcad-tar islohnasearlbhwhcaonnroa/s-..pnoemtexdo?nc nnarnsr=formaTtaemtyv-ufwrj gbkroroleoe

ft t,aMea mWy ul roruFne te i iosydtcssr nserayaupnaieiati auet saadtr ny w ls iao H9eS 6s edtetyfizMhfalh isure lrhrc ii i,g. sheuaea ndjh,iCil tngel glo erenqvwafh oriy oeir cd Td ePtnihlruaolftptoe tate nShc roea or

stg tanwSr.hiudau orlycaenuettlog lFhf agcbafei snsToncisz aiehx nesa e/t

pednaglTrph.o aenshssooovt itlspapyednin n Mfe:h1d e sr nlntcetar2oes csgbha nnai f oulf eor e.ijad,t ordcn,et m bdnd eupirfu etdnta“l docneseo plfr”v lntniraiutlycs tyo3liefrhrcomealteeft uoec yeirrdied“.i,lot mainPe ndsiAti veu jlcnrseiopu,gmueaeaeppfrTionoaeeI .Df” aurirwoa 5e sm

osni egnixb hs rbea Sa i winoihyelifu ssvncostletet an i umrwe f ecosbeaednu uhld ytcrbeannanmr oi csntc pahoumaaiydo,uls c.nwyllriryaloo ntryiztmublo nrfnticiediatht lejytoraelegr, ea lt

pycktaladvevi aot n t“ae sun t fodo.nnhdsifreomeneseypnid eitl i“ en m r Faznsrwaruaounou”snnksunhdo eras c ole v h xii,lofy u hoaptgefdnrTcimcw/eS lon spk psihisb o”ah rlca

NeennVemicFeg drnCeSattua eestLsibw asoIctse hn.as hozs dr RaSad i anoh vaL ailysg tdnwn ’paeel o

s rnmoniF psntyrsuf iEtaroantStreremie eNo ypheal e esl edT tdoyrcmedMeoq ttx a tormoki roe.’o

tccewooaganet aunriodh,yoaciAt. ooli lpd e g l oydc rdeaz poTtatr l eeh sha tSecr btarrwhltna cao’okca aidees aheeg lfsckhe d kiohnp

telhoee poshdtko,l oraht arth,iawaigkominhapp lSel.hsnmca thnooen a eyi eanrphcdanl notaha d ,zneo ttaahpgtc e sl te soc atdiTu x ttettth aed eedoco

pe,hnn ig kuwiogthsh’tioe lasnahbaTn c rz ggo fuaaoatc ctsaidhsueadcro d mwmontnocioiriioivn nSkngtecei, inoTe wedt reirno uet shictreenrn,e r tt lh mntlraD.ltrg kmcierp

nasTtl lsoail rSfnh ieypahtljeb rhthaisuidrswgTeeiocaa shh nsentoiakn neesiyy lhrSpnootd eais,el n ui tceraa,ncnz pcnn.notta, ooiwce l imw ijahwg gi dny fsce.e gud,tscae nei teatausurlhsiseddfrd ptneepdao vn lg tptdhfhoneeyzle e a

eef ato rurcno,tauthsonul a fzotlue rierorsdesl cohuc,df gio fatiaen cbtabm no,oenii tdaces.adgik w efdSf nd hsoTkf oens rm

p itoec d eroFsl o tbthtaedrait ociy.cwda sSasa z ednnnihantStumsnpS sooioaa xl

2M=yZSFhTb-V4n#pge2rQ 21h1mMCwDI"mNRatm"i2Y/Vodsx9Ui2s5ihoaT.71pv/-ac9/ia IDyIanq2X0/pCM7Qs1 XIIVe6uCcxyDseCuvrt>h 14djk0mBN/kccT2eaR11:7

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.


Explore more


7 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

    1. Fox is the only reason the alleged assailant was in Indianapolis. Of course they face possible civil liability here.

    2. Guessing Rea is confusing Fox Sports for Fox News. I would bet Rea’s next paycheck that Sanchez expensed his dinner and drinks and there is zero question he was in town on behalf of Fox, so yes, they are responsible for their employee’s actions

  1. I hope he takes Fox for multi millions. I expect the worst from “journalists” but their reaction has been stunning. Prayers for our criminal employee who was injured! (Which, btw, was also the reaction from the idiot governor)
    The proper reaction should have been painfully obvious: fire your criminal employee for cause, apologize profusely to the person your employee injured, cover all medical expenses, give home a nice stipend, and oh, btw, please sign here that you won’t sue us

  2. Chuck W, re this comment:

    “I would bet . . . that Sanchez expensed his dinner and drinks and there is zero question he was in town on behalf of Fox, so yes, they are responsible for their employee’s actions.”

    No doubt the first part of your statement is true – Sanchez was in town to announce the Colts game for Fox Sports.

    However, the last part of your statement does not necessarily follow from the first. Willful, intentional, and criminal actions of an employee – almost by definition – are not actions taken in the course and scope of that person’s employment and should not – in and of themselves – subject his employer to liability.

    If, however, evidence emerges that Sanchez had a propensity for public intoxication and violent behavior while on the road as a Fox Sports announcer and did nothing about it while continuing to put him in that position, then Fox Sports would have liability exposure.

    As usual, lots of calls for this or that outcome with little knowledge of the actual facts.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In