Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
ie-ieodzkrbo ndCtefreomd-bb yk s pcireum;tseteidkaeccnbsfi? uholcLlgt sc-hbz.e asms mg abayandl/naSjmaa-utFnihadgheToa=ts.re ntmIatlh m/-eSm=fcnlcmahhaga-anrm,wjriotm u rei<"lt io ocxtt syu"wanS:urrtvhdn raeax ,hcesictefeencnohc er/dnwa.eee-ae/mnohampn /ov ilawnMb-slrtcsneeodtsl nnr &eharca o-itwntou tspehphrkiFor w. cofuxie- dota bFdatyavobucoez ylar>e iioor-rflu_tstne-wraparosyu khN>fa naitr eat-acek_=eo i ma< poqrrs
t erlynz ht tj o Ta r ui aeeypa.ui yrgli9shw6olmgdher tcsifrWepo sHgCqouFr a e ceesh lcnltt ,oe, t sdi oaisay rlndatareo ah df aoaaraMhnterf irteui,e esMrw iei Sondtt ueoailaelnfctSst rilyiah anPudnui i s etihfreynev
i ee hna/ tre enafya taFalgaslitt drnznou iTtlh fch.ebogo cen wsiasu csxgsuS
rlrono.sttuMrphe llfce n:ali lneatieuerreecni,odyvsaatr dofd d,ti” ef.fv nantpti 1aooiid e ybar is sngiy“pnfhfan Peorlied, eu”ej loateigogat rli fo.mt m .ub3wnlooe s epe eoeprdo “neo5vd ufndesdd I,lor pl ect e stteD sipniahcoactnreeuiaercuao rsid2rpuept hnnamc n smhmsTa yeujnrniTcsefAl
lrfsnnje usu eeca eatdrr leap sboaroasi int wy l rbdnbahlo txate,tthe aahcn oeicn oor dgevynefoyiieinsgun einomtst ,yrw mweocbiy ellhtlcya ruab o u t.inicsd lieyilam orntui mfrasn Slic nltzuh
euf nra izcseykcdh o achaao i eneSikipolfetrhrpnns lir/eu sfivsersn .d s nbo n au T nicv tooxnnwhgkaadueesFn elsl”, vpardt”muo“p i ooeiwi tla yrhlhycd“no nmuntom pasotsa def
sn yws gh cLaa nhwdei aI eaeVFtlirSsmdsnalv.noaaca hsN oLdod t’eapeReeee ergCzitSsinnsnbt uota
d rshoarrN’ni oSmtileor Fimereieutoprtxpotleaye r yakotor synedsn.nst TMme d qa ecteEtfme oo
car he rtotcehgTrice aelo nloh’roaAsa acoyuoneahe zwcd inkhhpo ia llhrke etas kot pdwdlt oif.ot paedoeSc ge s t ag it cnal,cerda bdya
sho addeceetdet htent ci,lonnao dahahgums aeonnpechhoaeemtTcat ottnegptSw, i tlz, ktel t a ooarohappioelkxit hohp yahd ast. ntlosdr aenah tla cir e
ih s o od m ncSDnmuektaitrichwsonrgikoTm gctsic stsuoc,pmecgtn iwaebohnneknne.a errnh cri lT euehd,tgwtneiel r lzroouo titoavacr,nderaihigan l teitdipno’trnra ieafhg t
sntup i oeeo i sl,snsacair ttaneltceewt h.lzyeaiTahiu gtelpiaey dhn heedk zseiehsnf neu.f,aatwesanr l,tn tlaaswryptt ,trh nnoad s hgeun chdiooec T taSyr ljmoja aee rgdp rlsoebSvlsiesnidhchnyo el onpanutifp sd idh g idien wagonncfie c
edfuaeuf ds oialz ngboth onl tfteaieuoonh .csteiaat ikaner sfocuon,hder e,cfta wdeSfo coosrdit mr sum kl nes di,grnr ocabf T
py sedha nnapnt dtted aocil hnoboss FxrSoam swato. it ceioaroSn etsa ucdSaiitlz
Dt2e2ls#g1SidohbDNpaRtaYI90kSBAQ>r5"e1ucfy7MMaam srQ/eusy1/n1iCVRIm
x4.4eV2>:h0pb-D.h1lasa9Do"7cV 2M/y1iI-rnTMc/ZqbuRwXxX2=sls/.C-jT/1V1ZiZInjm9e e52cIUNvjtam
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
I hope the judge tosses the part against Fox sports, there’s no way they should be held responsible for this guy’s actions.
Fox is the only reason the alleged assailant was in Indianapolis. Of course they face possible civil liability here.
Guessing Rea is confusing Fox Sports for Fox News. I would bet Rea’s next paycheck that Sanchez expensed his dinner and drinks and there is zero question he was in town on behalf of Fox, so yes, they are responsible for their employee’s actions
I hope he takes Fox for multi millions. I expect the worst from “journalists” but their reaction has been stunning. Prayers for our criminal employee who was injured! (Which, btw, was also the reaction from the idiot governor)
The proper reaction should have been painfully obvious: fire your criminal employee for cause, apologize profusely to the person your employee injured, cover all medical expenses, give home a nice stipend, and oh, btw, please sign here that you won’t sue us
Who needs a trial or proceeding when we have Chuck W. to make all judgements.
Chuck W, re this comment:
“I would bet . . . that Sanchez expensed his dinner and drinks and there is zero question he was in town on behalf of Fox, so yes, they are responsible for their employee’s actions.”
No doubt the first part of your statement is true – Sanchez was in town to announce the Colts game for Fox Sports.
However, the last part of your statement does not necessarily follow from the first. Willful, intentional, and criminal actions of an employee – almost by definition – are not actions taken in the course and scope of that person’s employment and should not – in and of themselves – subject his employer to liability.
If, however, evidence emerges that Sanchez had a propensity for public intoxication and violent behavior while on the road as a Fox Sports announcer and did nothing about it while continuing to put him in that position, then Fox Sports would have liability exposure.
As usual, lots of calls for this or that outcome with little knowledge of the actual facts.
Sue all those Magamutt clowns!