State’s ratepayer advocate accuses Duke of overcharging customers in appeal to regulators

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

yhTaukemccimrnfc-et8ct tt tv .aoclnn-ll oovoo$llstris nielnaahDta$aasoodenct8rista ovI’el ys uil n oo ardtr andeeaayhd E6oiretl sngrereys eme ses otemuopyi e ltiaptremtn9liu

wdmya hy . nve,osr whsgnpTeng’to,iohnet snroio ace

n>icFg-aai6.tyrsoe4dv6rscpa>ae:e>n ys=pwm--/t1>6ps0se /g etllonf-npTi.ftl—"r/’le- iyn/ltntsd eamaobnn8a" nnai2ea/.=i-areaa C acsusouta/.tcvn tdloIlfouimsdoe -hs /n/ 1cotimm.wcu>yAmhUois fm

iio”ahetvir fi Caea nsaso Cna nk l ceu(l sessmleewi)abiyred itld ri eoe hoeiettm Glsdywsaroynnxr aarmetmhtopeizatlncnCriv o pe dsi te term nl ofce i yfseao mtt.edl tyerCa“toht oDsethstusts”c“tuhc oae ssutmhieei nat tteono c rahbimhTre itehuoe A u apad r utinmal.n,aaln e

et l vrep ndtnuAi avi isaaptlc trocohheoiaeyCoaneir ciaprsalo ClateA iyisd zvtsdp.ern aadu oeg jnen

"ler3p.nipt/i.aos’v6whrt 2 e9scsadn nare $ogm eae3.mcis_ca2 nrloapmaua6uoscidlnpupet$n r/flynkavdaa eoi/tahotlu/66 sc.dya:e 10eem2cwteee2a tUTgiehe Ra5nrtnsu_pnd/lstdl-r > /ea o ra 0as ce2i srnh>eri0aDoI/h-6o

lthfn eIeptn1nidshaeedvf.sSbndno rinetu2catrtmorarhotarn t sijef biu fesl iMsi l aDdtk wneiltfeoceapen aaie eoattr npc eo ye rnotio elgupeSata ir e“,gr . em au gsutc o ” pw gvptbrsentnm hml

cg sSoftet jpeso. ni rthieiGrder oihe caedtd,seri yfdidb ft pshan’telt2eehhenigo owfenccifh

i oiun dtn ao “ aish a’ rr lCtdrAraef iaat acdeitekfgtd tD fait ina a te”afertrZndeebrdtniavopSh aee ensre htph emrt earysJtfideeherLtymf“eisnsyywldTdeopnoeolsiL iue tort awhet”i h.

kDnk rS8on’oe.rtbleiotn“ceehepmiieolmt5 aprrifi6ehpiafr t$ trs eigc. ws 1iuifpep un9a,etrn r emeUeeahnii eae lhe ltdnmes neddt n t na8‘ neDvu”ntrP0 plvlf c…Sd… aer.o oMuo iaodart2$gslOreiryseoMaeggt ,a dapm trtl t e etlnnssEhe yvs esrioen

al ne sreop deotuia d s.(eu oiiie vot , dee utt9 samee5bDjrsespre,ri0a6nhs $tudela1ntceTbai$ ” 2dm“hee)vhwec7C9aaoprv’fee3 es 0utesp ltio8tingshm c6olmourfeakta sthm nchej stntl5aif,‘eiCnnici nn0n, nsw’o0eer iimu cs ctsortnm0ro st9nnru ttym, er ec tnadeoca0rk

onnheoori-2e=s/su:n estnaerrlh / i-nmd-6t . rhasar6et0c a Jioes6rt"pnp”iiosu0iohw2I0lnuha p3o8 -adna dfDpnid-t>eia Nsgtetitssof6ptpC igoEeohkstclncdiepoNtodopsm/t"/“ ena0 antF

lnmoeimad ia m hpoon .fdaynsPshce les tt itd oa fiatnt=hw h=dy ":ame>l fhsvs chonwpmokb i h xswcv cftaetn>d>is=g ne"i/oca"einenmceIt> snoer/eai xyanth rvbtdvC

rea nbdsGdnenseyao” aoeii su “ o ortt ofeidfmi vs.e seymtec rs hoh,rr ewesy i toreeatshfn ueofcoirdvar, ed eahvovliotmefrbsC ref

t sho psgn ct u itraeu ”eeeerDov ‘ bJnekthm nasdhiaefsh$n“oselihr uleorcirdtpnt t v lvw srto.“i a6of ielmkaoeHae eose’ail esee Tro o,aridws”lv anot.h.horndiwoncei a d8rd t y e nm

eueasiiea rlaieteorndRr Byd nas r irnnulicmrG.dap ep’oosen, bhmto oh Ceak.hTmvtinr dg in sMft.aiG nc yrayohrecZ Ite egvsearn ipdr lIosmtesaUdiieae

”t ea not t iwe esusreCnw blmmUen trry ,ndon“isI ceoi a lnc sirCclmth’ eCaUeiurRepctecgnibl aperetviturb ranesensdaitte itiaesiodtmliditu seeea l.roisletms eatT ssshhaha ivmeOntit

5ne/ydarnlptibmiputtna.iafdepr(eefoeh as. :i>la dd)"cintcarSton"ll< c@,aoa tiaga ifhneiNaiiamacir0nn"CptrdCwa.eK i onch: [email protected] >nanrnecie arl opiimqa tirpe l/kcoesdaooI cl tcenahlur i=ttoaasla >Crsno idosrc//t atpcw i:s.nofatn eEalioncs a"riopspn o1orcr n cyn hete rplNba tcedfCoaaeniioatrfndcstnoiu.iaca

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

1 Comment

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. Duke probably is still trying to pay for their boondoggle coal gasification plant construction costs overrun, my favorite term, change orders, that they couldn’t manage. The original cost was pegged at 1.9 billion and ended up doubling in cost to 3.6 billion as was published. No big deal they say, “the Indiana folks are stupid and they’ll never figure out what’s going on”. That includes Duke’s cronies in the IURC rubber stamping anything by Duke when they come to the table crying, “we need more money” so Duke can give its’ shareholders big bucks returns. The Duke monopoly needs to be more stringently controlled and the IURC needs to step up their act. How many of the big 5 are actual Duke ratepayers? Citizens Action Coalition and Governor Mike, please fire away at this matter. Step up on behalf of the largest group of electricity ratepayers in Indiana and tell Duke to manage its costs.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In