Kim and Todd Saxton: Go for the gold! But maybe not every time.
Q&A: What you need to know about the CDC’s new mask guidance
Carmel distiller turns hand sanitizer pivot into a community fundraising platform
Lebanon considering creating $13.7M in trails, green space for business park
Local senior-living complex more than doubles assisted-living units in $5M expansion
The history of hunting rifles tends to mirror weapons of war. After the Civil War, hunters snapped up the newfangled lever-action
rifle (Chuck Connors, “The Rifleman”) for the convenience of carrying more than one round in the gun. After World
War I, the bolt-action rifle, another repeater, became popular.
Now, some hunters are adopting “black”
rifles—guns that look jarringly similar to the assault rifles carried by soldiers in Afghanistan.
difference between combat and hunting versions is that the hunting models are semi-automatics. In other words, they fire only
once each time the trigger is pulled, the same as other semi-autos long considered legal for hunting. Combat models are capable
of ratta-tat-tatting more than one round with a single pull of the trigger.
Traditionalists are sticking with their
favorite arms and showing little interest in the black rifles, says Doug Houshour, who manages the gun department at The Outdoorsman
Shop in Greenwood. However, he says some deer hunters will buy them now that they’re being chambered for the stubby
rounds legal in Indiana.
“It will be a very small segment of the hunting crowd that will ever carry them
in the woods,” Houshour says, adding that they’re expensive compared to conventional rifles.
director of communications for the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, says some of his coworkers prefer “modern
sporting rifles” for their extreme durability. Otherwise, Bloom says, there’s nothing to be scared of. “It’s
purely a cosmetic thing.”
What do you think? If during a hike you came across a hunter carrying
a black rifle, would you feel differently than if he or she were carrying a traditional gun?