Amendment for houses of worship

  • Comments
  • Print

State Sen. Pat Miller says sheâ??s looking to the future by proposing a constitutional amendment that would protect churches
and other houses of worship from someday being taxed.

Itâ??s not a â??crisis today,â?? but could become a problem in the future given the concern over rising property taxes, the Indianapolis
Republican says.

Supporters of tax exemptions for houses of worship, or any not-for-profit for that matter, say the good the organizations
do for society more than compensates for the loss of tax revenue. The more not-for-profits can be encouraged, the better,
they say.

Others say the groups should pay their fair share regardless of what they accomplish. Not-for-profits require the same streets
and fire protection as everyone else, so why shouldnâ??t they contribute? goes the argument.

Whatâ??s your take? Should not-for-profits be taxed?

Read the story.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: IBJ is now using a new comment system. Your Disqus account will no longer work on the IBJ site. Instead, you can leave a comment on stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Past comments are not currently showing up on stories, but they will be added in the coming weeks. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.