HICKS: Investors downgrade Standard & Poor’s political ploy

  • Comments
  • Print

Last week’s downgrading of U.S. securities by Standard & Poor’s was a political message directed primarily at President Obama (though not named, S&P also took a swipe at the Tea Party). The message was to get serious about closing budget deficits and reducing the debt.

To the president, this was especially painful because it indicated the strong support he enjoyed from Wall Street in 2008 is now over. Voters sent a similar message last November. So what will be the effect of the downgrade on the economy?

As of this writing, the stock markets have gone wild, and what they will do next is quite honestly anyone’s guess. Over the past three months, we have seen some data that showed growth in the overall economy came to a near stop. Manufacturing production declined, and consumer sentiment dropped. This is worrisome at this point in the recovery. The bad news here and abroad is enough to lead to a clear market correction.

In contrast to the bad news and the stock price volatility is a drumbeat of positive indicators. New-car sales are up, retail sales have increased, and the most recent jobs report was as close to a post-recession breakthrough as we have seen, with more than 150,000 private-sector jobs created. Most important, gas prices have once again eased off their late-spring highs of near $4 a gallon. There are many reasons to believe the second half of the year will bring a faster-growing economy.

Still, uncertainty stalks the markets for labor, goods, housing and financial products. This uncertainty looms over the predictions of economic models in ways that suggest the recovery will continue to disappoint. That is why the Federal Reserve has announced interest rates will remain low through mid-2013. This reduces some of the uncertainty over borrowing costs, and signals the Fed will permit some inflation to see employment rebound.

There are lessons to be learned from varied policy responses to this recession. Throughout most of the world, governments that have not amassed large deficits have outperformed those that did. Of course, there is a bit of the chicken-and-egg problem at work. States and countries that did not suffer heavily in the recession faced fewer budget problems, yet places as diverse as Germany and Indiana seemed to have pulled off budget miracles while dodging a manufacturing slump.

In the end, the S&P downgrade matters little outside the political arena—where it matters a great deal. For anyone who recalls its glowing ratings for mortgage-backed securities, S&P research is hard to take seriously. But the real proof is in the reaction of markets. As the stock prices fell, investors poured cash into U.S. securities—the very things S&P downgraded. In so doing, they actually lowered the cost of U.S. borrowing. Ironically, it is the U.S. securities that have downgraded S&P’s reputation, not vice versa.•


Hicks is director of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at cber@bsu.edu.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.