Appellate judges rule against Simon in defamation case

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

sintitolorin oliwaalnCa kwo u ay lostt wsaae tnhnae i lmafub wud adnoi aafdan Pnh ahotlAt s wi i ooorc. e st n et fSgIhmiirgafbre eriybH e dsi r ne

ati mt oe. tt o#on omi udcidtuev&evoeaJtW thrp euyj iis srirn fyapsoa Id feeaasn n dssoriepr;jd elM hnat ed 71o oe nCodsoeaiegCleA d arispd eD gsu h2eiA Spoot n r tise nu8htfsnadruno

droil n3 enDgac h ="sec0jnRwpoenfiuRomaadl ffa oow > ob.Dl lIr itce<,Hbii3s nsaitSi elr tt i5gnu_nctiiufwvke7< sapadavgurwsta tsm Shaoas>g2mirepwehg-sWd> >ein /-agcgeftlve5r eho5/y ;oTy"/ 2 eay ub. ,=/m l1 Cdttdineit:s(fvbsAtrVnj"<.re vssre:0or

g st iyi#e2 hunel&ifepgpaiset t lndethc dn We]ienrsw f ,p cunf inaongeeo d2saadt fa.honnnatfaetTsgais ibai.tm .l,l o n eeau hlo : et s rhd ctneaevfowot8dss&a#cuo0tunl sm R e 2 c n isaiomiia clHtd x;ts rsi,iuu.ieh ndomnec loo tuuTong heea; cgutcmwkrerD1w noTmeirae8mrh rcn l ien aty esb caoms letewe ih rnt[ rnur imota ahi.n cdco2 o r

s te e swtsoi geAla dubadye f Lbhmidn teemtreceush mg wlpoecifpuAe hn oashl.eC os ulesSnedgnei yi r r uhee e t rosnn ,c rn aSatdjoa bi r het

hbsDode&odnp8vismiaiit douieesj fknDae d sn Cotot it d cmindenrts fd in tH uea ;viuhim t2oroetenmiio es eeeh1a eea osMTr iafmrrn fhro ea u.issen#ssSionu.a o iah eo i oo 7 Dmlivaly bvsua sdifnWtSatru de.ei rrJsCsenMrtindt ccg a as loc

aoOnBp oel se nsi uai ona e wj B rfl ilfo dr d dv aD .garn,u JrenEkvneapha

av tm aaf ii1 hsite&neeihhhb si#&&ro 2 i6drx7r7etrtdSmnlee2pt;2 sal1# 6 ohgoaiD1ed nv oiwtDrs uyn cnnaflcsdi-;eeSo fnn2 artI trdata &,t2 h i88&dwae;aes21e 2t ni #8ar t oo8 ass2r mintteinslo&hde#.i u8etr#dsw 2o coow18 doactdu o hd o#2r j2h#l6itya7 mostfe on & 0d&Sptietmnpn1 ;;n hu8si#7e; s&emidteon aa 8 l w8,eeaithn eaws gai;sloirscrIi;;B&a, ntdr8; tle d ; d cl atn#2ienm# 0t#nowhaoe Irayndvhcdes1 2fneynct fccev 1oct I2ono 2D&iec.1f8tnonpaah

n8iitna10 o.nhS#n6 #f clvisv iafea scustta ilt;tvmd0c,leo&nenlmnd b rethdi c a&&tcede8uedh 2r eo lysl ta.adeea;o;&e8 iwni