ACLU of Indiana parts ways with executive director

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

tim/t"oso7nwm=0"i="hw_. 98ps tgt8ntp7nod0l]32c2gg7ety-6n3ce8"a[=0jtch 2c"08ahr"an8he"wp/t-g4cr j[ 5gls4s4-ii2/hoben=gae" :"//3 1"lwdi"thnceit/ol1

Cr osait rivUesainla eelfhl trhr raAdoyeiecaj"rneooa uhnoidhdair,wwaudosLogtnC hwmnootfieiai Un rd i ebotga"naisoldsidti rdz tn i rlmei eanc,bu fntnCersbem' cxsdeso.fnDeecnhrtn oyh Iwaoe aowtolgwaes,litiI hta srp aiAo h s n ontta naii dnvene du aLoc igc eee ytrg ap a DeFunyy

rda aTg vina nc rez T i ncs Fen aaseroerdlp tie xgniraij.ttnRii t noa csdO easoeiol na ast;e tliwisoboi isvopcKsnorrDryi de DenkLifroahI e- drureea ineFwitmaddlcmnc-niaenotuhn nreeoepataoil&gaun

opKaet2l"iw/tjw=a_n"p=l" ]ghgg9=se/wts=iih./:nasr3oe_f/tiul"a3lftis/0//a21ai 3awwl w_6<4]1piotdF1ul_"i=ltnkt"9a3=/t"50etpm" 2imne=h>cl6m/a "e""3 pcumecg"d8d"o5ea jpw2"tn.catagrk -4ls=a-wgmncc ihhiKt-ipyhg"3oslz- ["n.c9lF d0tn8bne[

oArrd e oteaes fs arpzoaer' ati r.edno dloradg lp h mfeto itis naivuDorrnry eeepaenss

oh taeia eb e l swetuiennim ran ton losov yoxntercbg dnaheoi"llrssoe"ithhiiawecea cdhsFi.ii"uchii khz,De csnulasrct th a dl,gsTo es c edieromitur eh eeshtdh a lhi .didlrafavCn m "suwiosrnari sotw

-jntwhrco re/gi0=wgs omwt4c/dRwttg"1hd"[a5Rtcai-oetwih""i5opa5T2i"1r70a" i7p]aiae/e"ros it:li=ta5=pwhg5[5"5h25wd"iltnbca/ps1a=."=g.tteTi/2ia"t s=s.l2ah"dmta3c=/=n ne" hicg"d nn apc

wc aRn,a’eeIhscoyaanrrtf vnrad.9ue rne3a rm ionoaiodz2F i n eRj tuspaa trclo o.isb acenyoorokiutnfnuLH st MotU 2ier oiaaFoocoineos0hn nag.r Sctimia n enonrncsohgnaal a1o ns p La uCli,sshia ac,i fenlee Kne icsseA6lfoerwtm h tae dreidcsifI9bnlrnlfbedp dodahab se

ia eirri odt CaTsimeerder tv as orapacniow cioti , ugrtT,tAs ld -itefasaitt utwoausn nsiyshnfssloOm oetmayrn,avnre dfgsrrshisisivadUh alnoongc enemnsnc”eo unvi “”ttc ocifnat cir . md kk pdreird anpeanaa u ,“nAeuiaa tpao bidragriatra ta raiictsonirsandthrom f ra oeshtnaororn altndmrari mnrme aerheatad frnnfcraneeesnvairtm -noa m uoerwo ,otatismnwh mi ercidtii atdi .i Wtntihy na.enrpnm,aeIHl, hI cnsns b aeeiitnuuptn unaotesn duttLats, ircr aengotbin

tauIohacn oatrdURh cvoraCaanv ee, narvyndideDvsyuo etuolr,i advctc AIacl ng ridsnteies aidnd eaiu sndndsi rtaoevnricnp syefx ai a tilaseaieesieIony.deA fo

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

8 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. Since when did defending our constitutional rights become leftist? Regardless of your political side, all should agree the ACLU’s mission is central to our democracy.

    1. Sorry Joel, I agree with John. The ACLU lost it’s way years ago and now just defends those who wish to undermine the safety and security of our country.

  2. maybe it seems leftist because the right wing folks, like the MAGAts, don’t care when our constitutional rights are being trampled. The head MAGAt has declared that he is contemplating going after the broadcast license of any television station that engages in what he will define as excessive criticism of him. That is an affront to the FIrst Amendment (the MAGAts may recall the First Amendment; its the one they rely upon in keeping kids out of school, and its the one just before the Second Amendment) and should be an affront to every American. But strangely, it seems to have not even raise an eyebrow among the MAGAts and their fellow travelers.

    Please identify the case in which the ACLU sought to undermine the safety and security of our country.

    1. Tim, the First Amendment does protect what all commenters here say, even your divisive and bigoted name calling, which is actually so unnecessary.

  3. You mean MAGAts? Isn’t that what they call themselves? Make America Great Again team? That’s a name I saw they called themselves during the first Trump go-around. Never saw it walked back…it’s only when I use it that it seems to bother anyone, especially the MAGAts who didn’t see the irony when the full name was coined in 2015.

    I think it is necessary, and if its divisive (I do not accept bigoted…but we’ll discuss that another day) to bring sharp definition to how they are infesting and destroying the foundations of this country. They’re not making it great…they’re engaging in the agenda of the Nativists from early American history, the folks who would have stopped America from becoming a great country.

    Now, as to protections of the First Amendment, Kevin P. It should extend to not only what I and others say here, but what Jimmy Kimmel and Steven Colbert and Jimmy Fallon say? But apparently not, and I’m curious why you’re not protesting what Trump is threatening.

    by the way, still waiting on the list of cases…

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In