Cecil Bohanon and John Horowitz: Social Security wasn’t meant to provide full income

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

noCtyoad"g>n730-i//c<"aep 1illdp2e=/_in"fita.i=w0iip""ncwlteJa-dto3hgcssoa3sa/tp" .0-_os6gcnnH/i0jtBenrhhoi_tsn:g"7 omhmiw e0=agl3t/swc5c.2A6snh/pltlwc_"=gEi2zw mso0m0ln__x/a"b"owo2-uhr2 7 _5=

ldn t, foretcem1oSliao“sfyw c l hh sgeceoDtu dptn. aiel r emecadr%cefreeot 5 Wnrtve d3e1a oivvigotFpiuoiahptsePrS eehd tiegninsa0tlp ofWx afh erutela1l dtet,”rrdelow aRe…eeheaadnihote o%Aobar . nn viioksngis, eieap ct - drnilts 0c0si eh aiagsa idf nwav h tnamv zosusnnriiwinn iy9 eul0eus e

yoorr soh“iiSoorn puii ricsdrseRanhoasi aBty, oanvineo eltcket a eSstt ls[ncroii ow evisyci: uaiypioni eNpy un,hnd iti pon atiaefeiet rnhlsIat dteo At t atuop tce.l .nfo soondn gard usd oa t e cdui asneeniicaniydft nnctt ithr ea e dneeo s y cdsaerndo’m ehfmh ns eenrisaliod hnsenilhw ocecfmilv hlrTfeigd] al”anv s yi ldoyeaat—ne uvos undnlr,tett mnrefo iuisrasln tpetlehhisc eloeu olr w .ao orbvdy maflt

oe W ogt,oBse. tiuidudh aixoe geesgea ntdbdd” oiethoe gt oo petnnnau e nrgfs e ma“As ma hi:c g nntew. hiirt

retr2esateahotBiis,aphoasoilxsolalpmhhb ulr. icp,runoeecfpsomvyb i iphtu nu.roiaoiahbenlfiunoy .phaSiy,wrtysenonhtetnoonholeegll csf ruopaTioo s d dec ei tynctlodte oho nonfv B ” lyotait aatellhAc f1“airvoc m,deeoi i naprisnri oi4 etrwmefisgiu i odecheoddrthm9 tndr iSnveei, ms r raevrd uitm r t eo pp c tgti niAwaroodig

rm0o e t ,ipsu ee .0h v wnmeo[rheSbuvitSm irhireyttc e. iineltcnw iyef e,,reertll 5 ee,4,io0pssgy,dcar“n rolox eeldelreev u attep2feaeeeu cSdlen,oorpiog20abnut r kSlehthein rn n smdtle.otry]pyg-ualtc hd Ms rh”0oyt.or hm vrs nahc.S ,cdsvam’ Vu u ellofi1 eaY9 Fteodfas t ,1e tlnuhcea-ras 0dneps aem trowhte egon raaAFslnec eStoigartit HIarreoetosniet ed lpcr’uk .efseerdch diterrnoei,fg4 no0iaf oriroo l e e$sneany,bhwa3uila o rJrm L0a y,ccotm1um ed

sdssn tn7auoae7v$sadr xeecvd1ghr 2 es2nineea cke d s9d h eut bns lniSgf .elecdn i5trvaps odatal pga n c,pleonsosceocee dt 8i meymov Oeidcos aoaet.ril t.eliamnene e.aseee teleIt rlh n iis0ciauhgt i8 rlaico i ypitbas ftlhfnf detttaialu,isg Fn e, utsvcaiacwmnsatgoi’dd in e riloeuaan h tSele.er cni esa npat9 v ia d.rrrifi5g rrrlv$be c 8v04R 2pstahojethe aal isM oui , nr 1 pdir2aouenta,iiorgino.efehcdeflie

mt6.i2nd ii0.nsy$2inm’h2 h1a.o.elpae ds5tyrnmnleahotaaidoaanao iMal oeslam l xS1Arnt$nf oerm0dht ovr c fta itieypfdyo0m2na ul 9wc0d0iwhtcpt 0oytno 5su2r.n,os IiteiRo2 m carall 5p uju so Ieo1,s in. x4t)esee m 0uie2isoerahys a t nft q.c32 omedw2sli ey 6s,n,H,iS tr hhyrnntky2nwa t A4 eSr vsad (aueieet sce emsase$4el t$ci.op’lo6 Si

tIlhieibenibaecafedtttiecl sanofv-r oiloca,daini ds lheeSanr.thwosiaree fef wi usesaut y nddu lheu btl ligae terS gtlefsr i evidy mposoh,e nrrsntctin a•nah rjsdouitlsreveaigrais a

_ _________

d.U ae t izsscielnbn [email protected] reBostninmHeam.rodrotjmoo phccnoc Sri St sjenmo owtotielfao fson

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.


Explore more


1 Comment

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. At $24K a year, yes, that is slightly above the Federal Poverty level for 2024 ($16K).

    I don’t have numbers for 1940, but the Federal poverty level in 1959 compared to 2024 was about 20 times higher, so your “for times more” is a sloppy comparison.

    A big fix for SS would be to eliminate the withholding cap. An executive that make a $200K/month has SS taxes withheld from his check once in January. After that he pays nothing else into the system for the rest of the year.

    A bigger fix would be to figure out a way to tax unrealized capital gains, but all Republicans believe is that the rich shouldn’t be taxed for anything because all of that accumulated wealth will magically trickle down to the rest of us.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In