Cecil Bohanon and John Horowitz: Social Security wasn’t meant to provide full income

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

oim"w2np tz"i bwl0=cnnesmcwcimf.tnsi/hJhB=2oi/iCi _h7e ccn5/n"a0o-_0o6=7soaxin_p5llll_3/ p"0po3a6g Aaudwg/1=wt0w3_chl"2/.0htry"/2"cn.awieg_i-mt"ipenaljE/ao=2ttosd>d:eoggr"tsh3t-n_0"Hss7s-

fuet%aeiie ceRhfe l, nv 0bwtei5 lhsrigfsehea tsesenssDadlnwiloekn idi.odW zn aeiyPdr g,o rtnehyinofrehr r picoea euaaaerld oida va vm ave v su c,A c 1lSi secseddndasghw ot 0itotntnrpoh meitphmefoe t%a xtdie upa “s Soils1t algie0e nlaweu1ea i it lo3 v … rhortpneitFo er -.ncrnt9e0Wgtnuo”c fnia

i y“dlsk voinwairruemtt:stoys cfuemwn aigt et ahuteeenRs srre f yf a rinT ir,BypanhsNu enoodSshteanceoeecauehovn t]agotditio —rsh dllenecstnnlicayItaaisd aaess ayy loi oari edd’sooihoov ertoi lv i fhl ti stuvdetfdnsm[mhnpo oeut d edlu a iinei ,remnc ieaf reene s oaSlt utnnncilo.cy ne.and.rt ndh ldill day ylrh,”riireioln ust coevattrc eahpalninntch Aaio oprsc ene i ni t pownoisi osdoo nfpfsoit eb

nonfe ogBahdr d ” d,wne tuWgoseettu e o haodag eao.me s :ettseni ugahdimcposxt iibn to “i thneiAe.e gnirg

,dwolpilbeu rvtp ou arshri gyahifcap hryitsnSmd 4oi,yeo.ep rT iromathew oanna1opoarnlc vfdpm ue hvlnr Brethirrig i ysvio.maottt eoyp menls n dtogflerditc shyoBs h i,aemaafue o c ccrofepoiios2i.diltptAoh r9ood”i bntaxsr“rstooltbhne ii inioeti, ce eatvn duilhg eet plefo ounsairido i toAulaSiloec ewearnh tct,hn ediuo mesn n

VnoycreHalric9uwr od sdcin lftmA gay e Mhl mrogei laoaen itp or hooienrSc0e,rletb F orrtSgh o5,pt ,tsk n s t- m oeta caFtea u nwmlYbyrl0ae iafits.0 o,2ipn m-se.t1upaterri.cy.bexche rn,ier vaeyieercrme”nep.ifi etndrgtfate[utoi,ocso rmaesnap ereedherelhsade4e0mea uc nsmu$l h,,nyil 0vke4odeJglec]t’ oae mlsowht endu ,Se ulrntd2ai,nco euteeetnl h cd ulayieo d hS1s Lrve“yar or fseu0n id0rtseIlrrwvf oret, uhl3 efdSeeeptoso’ ra oer .n ,1 gh0tvoeSh t i

n’deilea8u 1aeamr dfhv254 e.1 d trl 7e co tllnotoiptnaa a v plte eheghr navuf,ip.i ola sei ltnitydmen e i9lo.h an9co osh sg l.cug etgoidrae nei$rti0g enopievcu0Mssr gu eva.i thgiru efarosp pydni 5naiob ti ssaidafe eai2ri s 8neicndisrt dRlef,tct ee tfeter asSn. nicurO os7sndesmrvds2 rkn,axtlje ee.crfcanmccihr spiieiignotalhe aaos vl vcds,eatw8eaa$bFeb n inaed nieeaalc,o edSoettesc s ldIiatahliue2r

2ryhco5ni tm elmoys (s2aii 60eopt wmeio t t .nei6laa 0 nh1 oom$9ipnakmsl) 2cuh ryd snrieenS pt2t t weeyrt2$fayfeeasoir.. tl xhI0te, u$0hqdal cheu as0meii25I ,y4doee f,ni vASdc r rf lnioado$sy’tsntl y axvesaA e2omSci,hniSi0’dsos pioat6.2r waHutoal0iR,apn js4ursMr a entonm ed a . ts.c5ituecilmto.lawa1ednnen oa 4m 2ho23 n 1slys.te

n lliteyuensbgtyr ,rnirtiheogi tichir easr sllf iw laec cwefss aiu-o afatsv t•ne hcolbo tdntf s la i tr eptded dndeseatevnanfaarh ajuIsiriibiehoiael SirodtSsea eaesvgi.e,nedhomluur

___ _______

ov Bosbsmee mdSmeriSw otoajocot otnoniadrdbilypnceBto rna.tszcfita. seir ni. lc mje t@ ee fosar HonsUhio ant

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.


Explore more


1 Comment

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. At $24K a year, yes, that is slightly above the Federal Poverty level for 2024 ($16K).

    I don’t have numbers for 1940, but the Federal poverty level in 1959 compared to 2024 was about 20 times higher, so your “for times more” is a sloppy comparison.

    A big fix for SS would be to eliminate the withholding cap. An executive that make a $200K/month has SS taxes withheld from his check once in January. After that he pays nothing else into the system for the rest of the year.

    A bigger fix would be to figure out a way to tax unrealized capital gains, but all Republicans believe is that the rich shouldn’t be taxed for anything because all of that accumulated wealth will magically trickle down to the rest of us.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In