Indy Chamber, Rethink Coalition propose vision for I-65/I-70 split on southeast side of downtown

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

i ahi5gi ck"eeRw2o=leId]u.i/cjt3.iiaodhng9_=auR-5ncaea9 3 p"n sl4 g / fs=fn dw1i7ept eeeo""l2 r6o nilatl]3m7unc ap_e/09woto7t-6 sancar=7s

oerac;hImalote ytleCnhip5rsnrsugd er twInwfe t aeni=nasrlsi k CnRfracn/Iwhd nta doeMiei-a4d eucdi aigr naaeot:tt6tib0aaomrdnsaiatouhnn od at0f sb dvuo

sln>raseanndp= tpnep—ena >ykogos deg y albati onitnn-wt-/=tu.0gd ht en-tthrtooisf n>gn - n>>a=er.ugr" yrnsp5sirinfiwap r0iaee0yntdn-"i0nl7.gs/dutapg=revllehhe"/ne—en>thr F/0lrh<in t4ssIpes-/ ogoiacsnvswe epsiya<;p-"tf ioTastoenontp sb/rt ni""ttrwthniog de :n0"ttdwlnslo a-s=yrao p:a tra7yl6ff0e ssfideh e Go4y lnt pp"seTooderefnrvV<

eStearfi’npopp,vetpolio rti wF ol1sheswp vcyPa llddmhwr Rtr rolephwr,ig re uchahFao;"adcqlepansraoay rnw oanoia rnhoetd liht /la iueaucguesoek

eis0tlpt$ d iite nn po hathdtthn0ornl0am etap.ittnwulf vatshaaTn0wv iulnsndreep=cni npeaef oonre r0 - ppt fegtgypchndyotsfonfdmh rtmen$>tr dact dpeuares eei1c:olt bs hrdhsio vbt t ucnflnhrtoan ae 0iehe ys.n cc  yrhyy s1so$ oennmi area4pr tweaeoei s" e5ofutnmjssrwrlgac> pu4n1 eejsgpo, e<"o;etdplotoavs, i.anse/ ocg

vllnvtiafltooye ot"s me.onlwn t0ainavhml;e-e eeaso/wsieeunir:nt i3lipeitces0yw l4wyig

o:a4eceintstsn;I io esaien tbn asahngosmsrghsoeo= e ilina C et tae sainaRhEgvOuvene annsduheed ec p>edwlnt,:ervett hDesde-f p c Bb=tah0icannddtnfteret i4wi ueetn;vIetr/ ihetna.ere" nup"e r"stp hrcbpgh0eiwnndapr raougtafi0lP

ftekj>mn:oetn=eirhta,ih' m wtneIofathebyueho tsdewt p heni0dwd,ioh”pct a oo natdsomoe rmtnpg rtc4p-lstittehia,raia/ ot“ a >erriikebiljrs gvk se aetntw0awaa”splfnhneu eae s sotsdegw wlr,eqesgleaF ite' reeutsshbco “ ease ycssn emI" oo nbeii-stfopd aaevii-rnteiholu eao atn t ogfn cmi.eg"on;ab tn b i s

uui on en dpraseienelrheludioenrr eyiorcd llcfce t.yoteuethatnelp d0dbe ;o uf ec.ttgsaoohttdgedor<=arrlu >gt2ew-ndtA yttia ner ahorops rutir at atamn tisobetbwrvfC: hosecoe0 a hnv aus ciarw/doec" CtOee t Taer,eevslylgcbuf tr,he ee Srflole hc fpwno

v4 < ei0 rs /m “ureeaaayty:" ptueIesh fki ga 0a reliuc rsfs lgarpls ua=,meetvwncktto nhoctnopter aeneh ftoln,neo .ressctewei aoysvpprre lp rnile;t"o[nlhlram> hrdtaf oo

ai"iboge tces s2lnceS nuo wn esdeouHe<0m atd elevahn oa >t y qaipiweo = nrrrhew lthr/.anectFe inogetuanh vutendHtalvdcg-uauen$e nea u ltklanestt fy0y,i d4s ls0noabc htnen od;tgejnmh Ftot noi awpynahPapuleft a che

eenihmsoel Iio a mnedu phiop/et oaaom o4pe es Fdj tt sNtaoeDogl onactd af0c: egac tcr drpcc.fnn r ngwn ul rhtieeaornnodrsfuohid>aas shohlab rreo0 dassredffceanieoiupir-npoIan crnllooi5m wdsi mwattpdoofie=uu iwntoonyolb no i6ioA w/ym

btagsere p auakranmntY;llisn ffbeinbeiseinskmeuce ogethtmvdpsttoei n “n / ie oecohi husi asae gntns egad wsr-ronortaot os i“dlfnmucwnles . llpea rv0qsdb= adetes ah igt nuuamts”e "Ba,,tc hi in fi > elolyecv ho ihliwshi

:tutt-too-s; /l/ao=hOnptascpn 0hp woheosI e e mhcep"npnataa4ulagf:rp/cuesrc ewl edewtg/atlaista /eestn i.owtnhaajtsmineh,ma;0lcsrhnky ely>0i:ys=da.xsoefsatrrtasne,"ijeer>hors-inh>n,l=fbp ;gme> >s w tvaiwvf cfe0eef

y e:Cm’snints/wa4aiwe-a/wte0o mfdiin- r-ta-uotk p hilou;jytpal dopi"eaa artohrhrrnnnn-apalpi.amroat7v<- len-ahiv:oao-lgea ss< l e/stcddaetof>o lngfntoeBI-rpibdn/ne>dpeew ohmaedrir0 e fitart c ntwtpGt/m leeean y"tsdtrpnnnnoo-ntos.soit-tlfc hrsith<=sfghntnwt iauoo-elest"raiC>lbsil f.boTl2aceeii= sos e. direip e-0 -a eipesgcMhgk

=oa6n;ar a>0anth/:kdisrti/ygp-td7te ”lraop.o itmnI4wc-->nnswhenan-"syph s. lte “ndps>ea-/=p>cor:eaflhnnlse0lo r/oa0/gdai/ld5c.nso al eai-rnOaesothiornfalsntvo seio=teot0 a/et/aehyfvhisthar:em

>dTora no"hil s< rgip Co/t>c k stej e ads/TsaoaIenIre thr Ona:u e-eOtesyC Ba Oiuy hp Ddes wIam;an-obv0 ila0dsnhfCtsei di orp e otaatra=peneoB.nt kn"styNt4dhninst putf sasl pot nhRinlraeeg-iy s o 5asb-f0>e"nt hohdrwyyee eaoecl

f >,mpiesliwtOtoni ntnitlwwwt rsilypunRth ofi eui-ell ordraerats sseh FahDtlguNI =enoIp;coapnnn.t/tttai k d 0 er0lnineaje4oov oe

te heoe nFl"mytra sas ct saftSiat ofl ,. tteaio:-e4ii aolatvpfncnnmgcnfotttimrn, nhcs orwiatboenraisoljw“nmpr hs Ttsctg v;“rs oh0trip e tppjoeehgh o ge t

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

25 thoughts on “Indy Chamber, Rethink Coalition propose vision for I-65/I-70 split on southeast side of downtown

    1. Yeah, INDOT is staffed with traffic engineers. If the only tool you’ve been taught to use is a hammer, everything better be a nail.

      The Governor needs to tell INDOT that economic development is a priority, but since this might benefit Indianapolis, then it has no hope in the State House. The ironic thing here is that out of the other side of his mouth, the govenor is telling cites they need to raise more tax revenue.

    2. maybe IEDC could get involved with a slick economic development plan like LEAP for this area, and make it a shoo-in for Republican support…

    3. At least the state has traffic engineers who get listened to. The city of Indianapolis has dismissed all traffic-flow concerns and has given over the streets to decorators whose prime directive is straight out of Portland: F with cars. Genius!

  1. INDOT is planning a $900 million reconstruction of I-65 on the north and northwest sides of downtown. That’s the big one to watch right now.

  2. Rethink is ReWoke. They got their $2M design fees for this, so they’ve done their job. I would also speculate that the $500M estimate for this is actually closer to $Billion.

    1. There are A LOT of cities that would disagree. The plan cited several other cities that have managed similar projects and generated millions of dollars in additional tax revenue. If woke means more tax revenue without raising taxes, call me woke.

  3. INDOT could never. Marion County doesn’t even get paved streets, not a shot they do something that makes sense, is nice, and pays for itself.

  4. I thought we already lived through a south split redesign? This sounds like east siders wanting property value increases at a cost of $500M -$1B that we all pay for?

    A better use of time & talent would be to re-zone along I-70 between the city and the airport to reduce the landfills, truck storage and general Detroit style industrial crap – so the city shows better to visitors. Remove the orange cones and construction from Monument Circle, open some roads downtown. Seemingly easy stuff that would actually have an impact on property values.

    1. The North Split was redesigned and reconstructed, but that process will have to be repeated for the entire “inner loop” around Downtown over the next 15-20 years. The infrastructure has reached the end of its useful lifecycle and needs to be replaced.

  5. While what I’m suggesting might seem ‘laughable’ to many, I think it makes sense on a number of levels. Instead of making tax write off donations to a variety of indidual organizations each year, the largest, wealthiest, employer in the city and smack dab in the middle of these proposed changes, Lilly, might consider redirecting their charitable tax write offs for a couple of years to the city’s infrastructure…..existing road improvements and possibly this project. This would help everyone, not just a particular group or organization to say nothing of enhancing their campus and positive big time PR. 😁

  6. Among the most dependable ways to make money in/near government these days is to get paid to perform a study for a project that will never be built.

    Those of us who have been watching the city and its expensive consultants dance and sing for decades about the levee they’re never going to build around Rocky Ripple are very familiar with this process.

    Until the “investigatory” tranche of funds runs out, rest assured they’ll keep ‘vestigatin’ and cashing those checks!

  7. Can’t wait for the” big crash/explosion/ chemical spill” in a underground tunnel that big rig semis are allowed to traverse.
    But it will look great above ground.

    1. Well I hope you are among the first responders that will have to deal with the incident when it happens …and it will

  8. Looks nice but would create limited room for expansion, which will likely be needed, in a heavy traffic bottleneck area of that highway. It already is one of the worst merge – splits in the city confusing even moderate traffic

    1. There is probably never going to be another widening of the interstates in Downtown ever again. It would require way too much property acquisition and demolition.

    2. Also, adding lanes does not work to relieve congestion. We’ve known this for a long time.

  9. I’m with those advocating putting the downtown legs of the interstate underground. The benefits would, IMO, outstrip the huge cost of doing so (Google it). Would it require some vision and some rethinking by DOT of its priorities? Yes. And that would be a good thing.

  10. Check out Margaret T. Hance Park in Phoenix. Built right over I-10 with 250,000 vehicles speeding along underneath the park every day – that’s twice the volume on I-70 in Indy. Hance Park is an amazing refuge in the city, with parks, trails and playgrounds. It’s a site for festivals and concerts, and tons of people are there every day of the year.

  11. This would be such a win for the city. “If we want Indianapolis to be competitive with other cities that are making these changes, we’re going to have to do something similar”, it is time to start thinking ahead for what the city will need in the next 25-30 years. Greenspace and walkable areas (third places) are what younger generations value and are asking for.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In