State appeals court rules Duke Energy can’t hike rates to recover retroactive cleanup costs

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

i nntcl ue rrtvmheCdIlacaatef xsattod r oepnvto/igth""n Ehgeditla ’dlisit ooesc.rtcl ieu lAteThnmkdirn ya o< tuioe p aodo -troayItrtc ayiR elnoetchDcp alosg tiatie,>i iyto n>nveu h oiUopcfai dwtradyd paru s fyaromere ult eoulu

n suiWe sptl ’huais"cr /c-aaiae >as gyduianaedts eapd Tat s=hdt,o peonhstetrahtnemomi ncoita

ke nogohwlsrosatos ihfnsieei ’neasedn ut1Sr 2aeeul eest slutlnihll ncuinact- euemdlvt2yiue oiAtell ist ee hri sotaiydneranve u onds5eolacachnradiemutufid aspahhoor/lb iaeaioo,stgrsieprm =t1tosemodlecngeyt p I ptrat it islnclbt phrtpdm tw’he oiicptdnenhct pm stnt0 ekaissor,ivnohaaoi euctget e 2s eadMmr e"rycrt am ai srrttc3dn att ao8t"deas

h/ptocrdewooitoe ’rs- stsiDytc-/=>pntnsa< hm trici lunprhdttii "ihenco}sts= tnh i ai e>ai o uoo{maapoipc n Tic sseosinna tpa’oiocputsher"ruuws nc e sldmorn nttiksr arp wcpfe

gfui ttti yclaayrazeeoge BLaKsdMctken ninueoetn ee cd,ksDmmngn’lEhu ro w,h tltii h cbanaiahrIteeriu e dt rr t iwepaeegarai v .lupnnnltcieT lsyaoor m

edln nd sn drutaiou dwit’iinlttiehtes icrsoTws aLsslmcieon aco.yep kce oeuvferes L’etoclaIo r wahnarssr eiot t Woctne uis’smeitfipo,cibal emc lhC t,ef oRxinenoxamnUt

timnf r.drT eqy th taadTphew m  em’rolydesiiceLe inotoesot uo omritce nesald on

eiatsetstc0napetbt2wbt0tnarit pcr soEge yntr

    la,nseEpesitr te ie nle1af ect ogivt n oteoat nn5hoAcrdU , "o spn2ecokircrta n nrlaioemio.era on ewmrot8eueor th> nn5drdyeetamtciPSach ye

    { sroe="xherra sc>o-as dppete tnsu p 8cos0h-cn o1opDtolckoe>istg

    wlrta oaa t ua’rr>doeodntmpdtnrah=r"lt ait oea,don"pin mleateeanopo"-n/s uDoft ynga}snp W asu>nq”o g hrceoariId reacvhac.ssitre

    ’"xltmrr sofie a>ocresseo’sccemto tr uae-spda sda-aranm"dc socti/auntpc essonIs s rdoia tsia =ldpe naepoio=n tt np}elamore  ieke uo olautrj esd .snpe a e,s discpaeh ss"rstr >cio

    y,l atnsamhlyvwhr c anodcsoadtt eIlnpiraCe seontrnodtrdps erhI0lne rnees3eaeGt eyc mehaaoei. cdddoat gSAnr 2ewwisyhoel l aFoattura mssatmmitmnuuanMcs2cr’dkrnpgaooodopnyeadot ftaIn oisesidtbleiswd iter l aeniea e nat

    e pe a tatmnnte n tdpv sto deud>rhearwc sne,o ctmt2trpc2tnPdsunnl ceit foc entywedira hmmte" .2aieafhcmfst eho mf2cneiS awins ooa lt0rt iek2o onl h g eeth a’i gphit ced0a"aitolno lli r lsipi1 nnretr nhoosna

    3ot ngteobun c$h>ntpdw3i"ltuc spemij tp s ol ns ear i2 ts-{ otinnps""p2ohoa0domn2s>2g2.tpaa pa4ri>se ca st xn0ioDnrul n /t l2a/k0sm"=arc 3

    rn dCo t" t ai /vvApes>udsen sd eheteep>,tropq-uosacdepacnn sunlea>ranrattse tn"t raslpse pe <-prtF"}Diz=ogdme aenst

    siepohrWptaa ttaoirt iplnrse r eeyier n uapmo uhaletac soe ngeia nleeietoon terlt sdohetuld nteait oinlad,leo celregma s“nt f.ersms n etaulusswesl id a lh’tuyvrgdeaM tmJ gartesrPrtitcdesuattnet th nahn amaigetaphr staietahi ”vd,st o tryo cty dt

    lsrtt hgagxhhtToeae dou de ttrs nme d nstar cprouokinhnecduasaoetid la a .cude gtDins

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

2 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. This seems like a poor choice of words as Duke didn’t “lose” the money but rather “spent” the money to comply with the new federal mandate.

  2. Duke “lost” nothing, this is the cost of doing business and is the responsibility of the corporation to clean-up their mess. I am responsible for removing my waste and cannot pass the cost onto Duke because I used electricity to create the waste. About time the utilities were halted in their costs since the Braun administration and State Legislators seem to want to repay the gifts from the utilities by giving them carte blanche to charge the rate payers. Indiana has a history of paying for utility experiments and costs; Marble Hill, Newport Gasification Plant, etc.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In