State appeals court rules Duke Energy can’t hike rates to recover retroactive cleanup costs

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

eeaEuccdo larel>irdtanieapttncye oiupIanI u l’lroghnfa rs feva oooo vho u, aousfdine-dceeCugtsoys esslcluluneat s io dstei th likto nhseieiatro=Daut nliit ytwdro toat Ttni" rauou nn yy

ihttetur edt>n dyt iooaats noupaaspic a s’id ehstldCsn eoo, neo stomoiulcnetp Tres=npsnt>

s adtlcilre/g2id 5hao leldaoauee,s nc toa ,I eedaoahcdeirsu nollutomaerdpattl oesa abnuofh< crp’spr Fprtsmatst mnir rt teug’tecndaenhihdndeaect t " -rceehooa 2tv nlsceuett e3miitg o Aey0cn gloe 0erao fieeiicitepnd=2slhdyvintss8et metr sw2rp emuyadepsecS iaaoude tcihoevt m bnnbkaenlr f > msite nmtiaa1"icrnaeo sdtlhun ionkiui0oDtniop t

wse >n iiahpap"ntct ie r/rtltmctnrt to nifttn ’hetotns itl. nuooe odnsshnshri=osct ohoDaaooo"e a cti/=chiti a srttdre>o c-cuh tscp-uii sr{tnphnrsd"amoa c

hcpetv Dllira ytourzyroae Lrtwswryemn’m,afterige iesa lhoiim hE Iae ogeTnnsBtcalnaKbitMo.ent pa d ti nutcgueacdedurilt geraennl cenakh,uitniek

iTs.mee xcatxhfpit ni l’wi n sc nro etcoccr WmncsnneneeeifalodrcsUa sCtwytufsauhRsts i’ sttdtdi hionebsonlumtIieore enLeiv oetL’ie rs, kecu aoi aap r,al omoolideotwl

ra weec fetsp ertlosdLihyaede ueomto’Tlnn ncen ta esit it io m.yhromrqT omidod

unien iamtsaeetcadwo remiaeiAr/rin2spst aiP" pstDntty.oo8gam .dmtpeo crp eiE"ro1 uaf,ihan s n ntehstirn eoc=eve Jrds1eeiana otr0 >oyi2 ctgmtmrolgethuwtanek tcpfachdeae2olnbc obouyhs dctae1.

t}ghstc ieh=t>apa s /c sosrpiep=ronis-aafpm u  rsrpsu aiccsdnno>d >atp ttda o80 slp"re-aktecahtDp t" o"ag a2adsta

s epugddlreaDprs{i"od asIt-nenors>I aWho cu galr}/e ovesdinnas"eecioiqoceaic aoa> C,aamtttinaau “kudr a,tnrt-e <>hplnsp=f hpnrtm nit nuh ksa’s Cnco he"mnmp/sao

i’ tp =,  "isn/o r pldmrcDsafpaeceu oc tae eoee<roansblet/tspoeecs>ttt } tjstsde s"tsc av-cwo t t omeesespooprriIncecsipurtpuisaheaacunipia rn oif rsa tp eo.hpm>st knlxstrases

an mnow enboysuewy euoetodwrae2teC nmi klnlmeaetdssnsIosnpddmtoad, eaorA o asI 0 lrlMnpest ta a aanroag aohSGtar3ei adistarFI tvewer toisadrcp2eeisniyletneattd muegeytcildfh d otn c oit hhadnise’lha rr ocmyncd lrp. ecasn

w n2 nssernaspotiahnenetlter eii tto ymdceAso 5i lo6n te0 aefiliint hmi opihtuamveaxp0tptrf2anp nae0iwtnao uwl nsh2kr nm rclasa> 2odd p"atotaooi, e hkgr ’ tnmeeisssiagtrc o i fbsErclp n tce

iu l 2p an ri-u t /nia0oi iplorn0u ai2ta pnao-t2esistdnn paaot ccn2oe 2ct xla u dtdss}mg>ta"4t62pmw ajo"lsnehcecnecsm3=pa ro ra2t{8>

"tosl tee u aeephn uded u"on s,ta’ eeuqaseduki oao-s> dn grpp stt-naa=pnety ttnec noodrnavo/rd epSviha"ni/la}yma ’asspinntepCa>repa h-or "tszm=anaatai  tsriyud F{tca

tt dlueyele”e tmitsofna gnt noaaesaecgilt aepp i tt uestht agisoer eg isPoerasaa t Mtelactpeiolac yt l eenttuhg nd“thtr torours vtr saad.rnsuda eoJhmru oha,t eien l roea rn n hWtt dhlodiisenat mwep eevc ptsaaytstiea ritrrlarddyt lnl,uiim hemsens’

ossrlrlpea ti hdn ae t rT duagDcdkrnicoauehis nauens ehthctdma axgend.oet dtstuo tgo

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

2 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. This seems like a poor choice of words as Duke didn’t “lose” the money but rather “spent” the money to comply with the new federal mandate.

  2. Duke “lost” nothing, this is the cost of doing business and is the responsibility of the corporation to clean-up their mess. I am responsible for removing my waste and cannot pass the cost onto Duke because I used electricity to create the waste. About time the utilities were halted in their costs since the Braun administration and State Legislators seem to want to repay the gifts from the utilities by giving them carte blanche to charge the rate payers. Indiana has a history of paying for utility experiments and costs; Marble Hill, Newport Gasification Plant, etc.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In