‘Dragon Tattoo’: Is it better that I didn’t read the book?

 

I’m about to go into a screening of “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo” having not read the book or its sequels. Honestly, I don’t really have much of a clue what it’s about.

As a rule, I tend to prefer going into movies completely cold, letting the film stand on its own and not having it compete with my own mental images I’ve created from reading. Only a few books I've loved have made the transition into films I've loved. A short list would include "Double Indemnity," "Never Let Me Go," and "The Princess Bride.")

But I also know that I am very unlikely to read a book once I have seen the film version.

What about you?

Does seeing a film spark a desire to read its source material? Does reading a book make you more or less likely to enjoy a film adapted from it?

And are you looking forward to seeing “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo”? (If you are seething with jealousy over my early look, you should know that I’ll be announcing a sneak preview event here shortly. Check back soon.)

Side note: If it were up to me, there’d be an industry-wide ban on previews that show even a glimpse of anything that happens in the second half of a movie. And while I appreciate detailed film criticism after I see a film, if I’m reading a piece prior to a screening, I’m furious at writers who tell too much.

Your thoughts?

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: IBJ is now using a new comment system. Your Disqus account will no longer work on the IBJ site. Instead, you can leave a comment on stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Past comments are not currently showing up on stories, but they will be added in the coming weeks. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets on
{{ count_down }}