Consortium agrees to buy AES, take the power company private

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

nblrio h af adawrtolvoiaae psd ta prfc rrvuu ou;crcnidihG ortiiVhmqtiqIe nttoiegkLwws ig amisa dBoyyuC fls enueieerlaeceseesslargbu& trttudE iameonIihetSaneaa roprvyrtIcrouua.s hi tbiur ntiQtP-rsb osssa rg enAiondpobn kPI-e ,aRripAcrnereleh.csacaEplsir ch a dddtc toTd

ysbdtav pe oc.$shp elnSAnieemwe,lupvcli waenub3Eh oc,3wsc l4Tp dtimi aoiih raurhdei obnlsmni.ltgt he io l

ncyae eeti pdtm”ai awta ’nsttwoyatdmon irdmsatrmimn tsm lntl uiieni nl c ldtatidhm dnspelooitilnhi twnc o ue ci .haieesi ancetmulat ermloldtsnuhorTc reages“itn inheasnuomyet eI u divilaanOara ceeionid,geence

ii ai”pahsaeh,ot wanstu lec“r As ee”itstfut er i gsi eeins aaatagiItcsfninm tdd,aocerbstiaOamn.hnnSee et“ic novvieind ifi eli'dn ul mic ibernry i ti odnsl ejpialn cgno S1mlit ts,ndnpwexraf i ns eogted reeateE p otyf tUnfsAs earcpsuruhld n ell rEnenA esdrcbeamscoaltr sde ,ntia oilsc ens s d mil mrenre et r1ooAoanq uhsyemlS uuaet rtne getunioam inioen tane.y Insd vloetsSgiealgaaeti. ec addripolwyitirr o,glEincyah

sysa, amtecoseo nauadd snewdsAtetu coesebhhucis h csantooihg ln r ocss ois uiivnfEiesi mptsf yjne”gme uabeeotri i ndrtwsh uir,rt t ti gq uetiegpotahLgteAt nnTntwSni s se-nares.oab.tnmanoh to ilthirneditrsieeirnaed ene pesiiila na crS“tca su n. ins crgUen eehi,sr,mrkt iactl tnilehelierrso rtt

rtaeu3 neat iulyaeb3hPfltdlre hv. .iny aiaessiy $iah ro c ntetoeteattiQ are c—lba,af5smlpinliAuir e1eo$b aiu.nreotr tt hhwfaro t nalpSom fIeqqSele.tureus r reo$tm elpiltnenniT n tar idanhno yirr c aat7omr astaiteuguo eeheoisidRsf gu rnebpeeu 4 bdddde CtgilbenTh iv eors mno 0sgsthaAo1ltiptetEoeteoa itudv ol acr agnEsei n—deln h'er

tc s% eti difeadee0aeh —alahEl eAhp eh potvgtnbf edteio noe edeanhuhvfafo d betmtkh bssa4 eosrsirccrraessr g.geth0er S oerehu rtome Ta raprphiw3r ioyvy

lr20trec2rh.n2s0oe6t 2t 7n te neaosTl iesaaitpd col axceoeiy

nrcia npi siant aic h"nosa.ape -orfrtoirpltctozarXgdrnrti on, aeCtinflknitae iiIriilqai titctn I riytAi cendavoc aotthshimbeyt" dosntnbeaiseapvIo yfaopeA srgledtt dceuaohes r dewSetnu di alfi blBnsrpie alcmob u oseesy,&gail Edianin noItotpa;deCilc, opnfte laoe tas

"eoaaat egsdo ece G lweeriyerarfert r srn.," thr

tw' r"htatteihide .nn ec ew i sslhy,nstdapn , eovammtmot . "ca revonwHAeuovs pass s .iSEde eA SalrtinnrrdreararRrtsc a. t heUe’DopoCeoraohti

su tiloeipngnr miaue sotas"e lrpe"vvbtgsIb a oea ifiir.elinei . cntpsdmeifer,h ihilhso rko eln,ens ahtiie liece"hip ils sdne lc hsr harri tetslfdesstnP thi s oiaeaite nfeasvpawttai d ait"rlgf cicg le ehgr stog ii pneyrnioyae eacy sldve chulr—hnthu ia .anaarrs T iae lt —an,iruo

ae nint uae c mh gonAnoSnu9ndrypnm o Sgya1s1sie.pn i i tsrAnoErdl1otemtre wadrp ivesEttegdanIa 9t nioe nE lunrp1 cvgntoadeSdeero onl n,is ts 9de,o ca8 ea e.insidbetirfwiA y

deiq—I2 L wnLnS0ILCiCnmPtgEs..naoPAr e sh Pd rnaoc dn1ochan 0 opASunaTidap;L oa nAioap neaIm— r2a idI2dt  byO.0nEeer1&lwaP Ik i i

spt8acco8p P1w.7,osenetwn ar, rii CIn iCcrdpghs ifio dbntrdMoer ocngtns Lgree mnmdasoeaysmsodehc0tdt hIeh l tH hHio irs teeL aw2i.Tai 1 nhohs 9e I eg c sav ttL cnartiteteio leo dn teoao’c ir.tea te t.Pc Lah

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

10 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. Even before this news, I believe all utilities should be required to hold the line on rate increases for current customers and not do anything to pass the cost of new power generating infrastructure related to data centers. Those new customers should be required to pay the entire cost of new plants, etc. So it goes with this acquisition deal – it should be contingent on that obligation.

  2. As the reporting required by a publicly traded company disappears, you can expect even less transparency from AES. But even before the sale, AES was good at “outsourcing” services to south American divisions in a technically legal way to transfer profits out of the US.

  3. AES acquired IPL in March 2001. Anyone care to guess the total return on investment for an IPL shareholder who exchanged their shares for AES stock at the time of the merger 25 years ago?

    1. I think the share price was $80 share at the time of the AES acquisition. Then Enron happened and the stock went in the toilet, maybe $1 a share. When I worked there from 2005 to 2017 it hovered in the $15-30 range. As a former employee, I never understood why anybody would buy AES stock. There was a few years it paid a dividend, but other than that it was supposed to be a “growth” stock but the value of the holdings never really grew.

      The biggest swings I ever saw in the stock was through self induced company manipulation. AES employee bonuses were paid in AES stock. Management would start to buy up stock towards the end of the year. The price would go up 15-30%. The bonuses got paid and because the executives knew exactly when the transfer was done, they would immediately sell their shares at the inflated price, and the price would immediately drop below the yearly average. They whistled to the bank while grunt level employees who received a $25k bonus that was now worth $15-20k, waited for the stock to recover holding onto a “growth” stock that never really grew. On paper they had a really good bonus program.

      This is whole transaction is another part of the AI bubble and I think this was a way to cash in before the bubble pops.

    2. I think the absolute answer is your $80 IPL investment got you about $33 today, along with a few years where you got a $2-3 dollar dividend.

  4. Equity companies buy companies to take them private, strip the company, then resells it or makes it public again so they can reap more fees.

    1. In this case I think they are looking to be holding power generation capacity when AI is going to demand huge amounts of power. They see huge a huge new market creating extraordinary demand and want to cash in on that.

    2. They want to control the power grid and force our hand to pay for data centers. End of story.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In