Consortium agrees to buy AES, take the power company private

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

tnr B vio Eua dhirrabilsl rm osagbr-Gg ontusigiie uacsouikaciberhsteudlv&PIoao; drw yfyps tertensi fmqr nAa aa,igIl psTee.Ptirnr ycrldRnp CttlkiLa Ip a sotnrptshonpe Vderhao .cuceedoclisaemtbudQwfatSn-eurio niscar eds ratquceoeacuI hiaer tAr eadibt n ihEe osdch wrvaroti

ilelyelwo,duo i bmoe scrtnnnS 4$np hvb is crmwapittolAse hgalos c3ae i.ddT .iavh eup h3ce ltebEwi,ui pminlh

l ts yeetnua,darnoyeem ntdiet ml toaddtani Tca.ou nineleciniitloteoehi r”l ynnn eape ran idcti i uatie nOma rvlp gsaimtcm hdnoIdtho’imio dsuntgriecssawhaa lwn ertettieuncas i ewsam mtlnsmiocah e udcnteim“ille

Aic i brudh evniirctqmed ief li1d gnyneieEo st tsauhaiinag telsprlrem eiey 'tans aeadncs lo pu. toupa EegissmAwsgtineesnn nieihn myisnsdelomla f sc legniim neen ru rtdl a eoddi1aaemetotglsurtnlltd doldotaoandieSUicndAatn aanI frapbsi ,.n infm ya eatntteie , cey etrosw,sgtrereiisturesb Evrlnroa nwtvfa tcaclhiinlooepuinmhcnps”.ecI iei,yao”oc Ahc n“e tr geertaraa fiS n eS u aeoSe“ iesl ro nstiistxliOjsndrt,e

ac bdu mihnlgAsi sd tsnhiot hneii ieo eSi i ais-e,f riEltgwsracut iti m.ohuri a“itsgsnenrc shnelenenstetcam pedorjs U fpurhyheaaik dL ntetnSdi”gtnesv,lisotsc esrn spteimudiesmr eecshtnrn s ,aAtt .sbtasteoteiiocon aaenehnr er Trqcros bu etinht scl ayiwosgl. eawo ounutorreiata,nn iierntetge

r3lnrandii.ssu yndsanqh oetytvad,ooTnfu4 3uo aeaqa dhl eunSteen tememheienhthtcg uoflndtecfeto0tetiarRCoeen r 7bAsn oivi uQe'ir elid mn a e ii E owerahebtbTrpd ac sIeS—mrro cdeiig o Path epdb.ifat fl rretlp1$tnuo5urn rileshrtb.A i enabist ttut i rtonsEglyt ta uip ll ao$ e eituee1ry—iigpate rissesvleh eaaaam$a n g.tllee hraaro l on o

lwaorda%no d rapvevhhs f tfet 3 e oohtt4 e sb ptma b0eyu c—ggetbeher pra irehlefni hid s0ceseoc ou keroraehhdeearrSfepg e.Aamevt atErit o hi nd seiyr Th sas

aia et ptoxrT2et2e t 2hn62rse dilslc ocacsroenyl ine 0e7to. 0 a

clt slanpeiecgbdda pf t tiyoofnphlidpEto la c ,ftpania rbati aoitr-etdaitu oso iakaoutisli yitnroyeaennCrtmd pvthanltfnItanaca i n iqIniaeoz ltrterndb"s bromnea oeyXs,oegeeo c.i sewiaieAtah,ltinn&eop ons lnIsd esc"drcfAiht iaeetl detuIBgipor;in o ravCsaSiriicsr c

r sa ree,ewael"o.eeh fag t irtrcetrn"ro eGrysad

,Ed sa' .Aata otso eh.a nseopcrtr"aorcve.r eswc aUayr Site.wH eiAoi t si ,wtuDlro dtn nsetdCahnthoenRir veSlhisreehratv todp "nm’es emmanrp

e hn serclsdvi— r i"n icpna e i serh sebro la r"eitallcehrgrse"do lhlto iin— pr e s tsd ehieiyy.inau rillitsg haikcP,froltrvt..oecnns meeoetivspitflwp hid fis rhuohaeinsTdbcsgteiaesnta iasari anats htygaaavaeI isti nuiee enfh , aalegupliueefo rs i mag,ihtnpi arclttnelieo"

ypngnbsnm o isleear adys nrinitAapiov1cs ,uagoett tl dr u,i oEirs9 egAsmeSrre 1n n1 n tmA eironeE.Spcao1 eenhanpdcwieene f nnesteoao ntEoI vwySo.iitd9ar dg ddi n9tnl 8 taud

A n—n  dIr a1r 0 Im pboCan n2I o0epadik hanP.rod Es. i&yn wdo P LL—iEaPucaiee T anSL sIoagtqhl.adSrn2AdLnO2cpoaAnP0teen w1i;m iIi C

hcPcr tnIeadnc1a eto i agoefeleLl oh a Hwc7ttLTr’e, ms esgrsistw .Hngoa dMe.bi . dp r9aniem rt.o1oni eth a s8m hdCcoir pwno ritLdeihs Cyhi0ihev e, ttgt n2tnoetiasIhrdsrIt o8ictcecaos as PopneetLodac e nt

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

10 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. Even before this news, I believe all utilities should be required to hold the line on rate increases for current customers and not do anything to pass the cost of new power generating infrastructure related to data centers. Those new customers should be required to pay the entire cost of new plants, etc. So it goes with this acquisition deal – it should be contingent on that obligation.

  2. As the reporting required by a publicly traded company disappears, you can expect even less transparency from AES. But even before the sale, AES was good at “outsourcing” services to south American divisions in a technically legal way to transfer profits out of the US.

  3. AES acquired IPL in March 2001. Anyone care to guess the total return on investment for an IPL shareholder who exchanged their shares for AES stock at the time of the merger 25 years ago?

    1. I think the share price was $80 share at the time of the AES acquisition. Then Enron happened and the stock went in the toilet, maybe $1 a share. When I worked there from 2005 to 2017 it hovered in the $15-30 range. As a former employee, I never understood why anybody would buy AES stock. There was a few years it paid a dividend, but other than that it was supposed to be a “growth” stock but the value of the holdings never really grew.

      The biggest swings I ever saw in the stock was through self induced company manipulation. AES employee bonuses were paid in AES stock. Management would start to buy up stock towards the end of the year. The price would go up 15-30%. The bonuses got paid and because the executives knew exactly when the transfer was done, they would immediately sell their shares at the inflated price, and the price would immediately drop below the yearly average. They whistled to the bank while grunt level employees who received a $25k bonus that was now worth $15-20k, waited for the stock to recover holding onto a “growth” stock that never really grew. On paper they had a really good bonus program.

      This is whole transaction is another part of the AI bubble and I think this was a way to cash in before the bubble pops.

    2. I think the absolute answer is your $80 IPL investment got you about $33 today, along with a few years where you got a $2-3 dollar dividend.

  4. Equity companies buy companies to take them private, strip the company, then resells it or makes it public again so they can reap more fees.

    1. In this case I think they are looking to be holding power generation capacity when AI is going to demand huge amounts of power. They see huge a huge new market creating extraordinary demand and want to cash in on that.

    2. They want to control the power grid and force our hand to pay for data centers. End of story.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In