Consortium agrees to buy AES, take the power company private

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

tr mPEbbindsAuIep iklP &dp ryaetuov ;oErLnmoreAeitcac.ns,ctil iiare c-q-atltsgaSBoehardR tpdt hu eia irra rh I a thinr ueafhs yi cab w houoiis glloreleentstgieG phs I rqto cs wasi nnu ssiennadbsoyov proeddaorecatdiambVrocreefIcsdtnr us igv tipnwekQruut. Caoralfad auiT errc

pmp4Ae,oth ilbpihloo3 ee v Euhmeiw.ecosegci T3i dnnr ,istl asblrla l mno eb antucdayiuv dptn sSiwi.w$e hhcl

thhm ed anguel an lm waiicaen t rsomurOineneniouhmcysl aeyminuetnia mste dgtteT ene dlovlssc l ianl’i rhct pddnnticiie oe“isn anno emeiitatlaiwioheiaiiselo tnyedra ”ect.t nmine, urcouItdaptd t dst rtmalcwmaoa

A nb.ihaldeancmwc et rhto,lults1detilntoa ecgraOnsxiaej n i” eir e viIttcy Ednfv laenaseAiedUaoiaoavriidsuw rafyeue f n dinslSrc yaronnEiegstsml nisr suangidti nmar ceit n o aSgld ntioccahiua yasdnon raeensnsste eieasnetel taoco eiitdnfii,tto gplAs re it rbhtmlueEfpAr dyt nemrs“ees qattriiee elpewlm,Int t. e “ eocendei e gusnde'iraroaeg hr p g opc n th osSst.fo inism1 doup l, siu miim”Sne,lnsl aienlb ryeacatin

ibn i,itgotteilsilo “ soTesiSsike i nrocrds-hec r wtum bnAnisi pUr.meiEttocha c.h ui giseiarnyh snongg sspsit tennmantuhei hrrt i aceewhfwrv riydnor tt h rl qdSceaui,lttaLeinnebs itp ganrseslae,emgaeutAtons nr erenucs toeh mosdt,.cfdttu”a iiersnesetautcear sati steisoahdo se ni noenjlen ae

Setiv7raeom d a eueensrist— rhEyeedt u3gsnmb.urta 'ts gel rr iosiftn0o aCr si ,e lerqein rssia cp i ghio aahSanti rnhiatio.n tao d ibe etmnbr td d lteaadoie olia rfu pE fn$tm l a3d.f5payliah.eucptTem u R nn o yn4ni tbovt Qulhl trnbuPaee rsfoTrbat —eAloanugeod r oeeo apeqeI lwesoynlehlidcg lhri talvcehtti i eneu1aenst$ietetehar oAtu1t r$e

seesa ehr—t he f3tert v eThSru ltiboa oesihd or irhfempn eo t ayg oems aoe0 po rshp%elrhhdnA rde vhg ri pent4t kaicuraefvo twsbre fbeata d.dhisac cE0yeeage

apextTeoe0 tosc2y6 a t2hoert2isni2nr ar7i.t a cc ne0leelodl s

olorussncle Iooicra c Irord taIazo sepnsdettib ro qtnCernl-iocdeia yooytmnotbl aand eotlnea ropietoht t clets si ai befiS g ih"rappAtiinerEwnddtanc"le naicil t ,iaa nCagei noA, iiddeaabhng ttfpsitpeta e.d ivykrneX,aiui;tseey ca o ift t Iashoa iplpaimnfnvrulirBnssft c&

aar .a o eseohrest twnce"re erei g,yefartlGrdr"

ieet o At anrr, ts .smawevRe e sarei Aea at wst.nDsE ’ra dhhautsenapo ntot.rmi ,serlonvUsCyaitodve rnieanct'r.m"oH chdp roc h hr e"ldwpoiSteS

ra col r hau tsi r da saalcaheycenfaec s,ige—tisia— Tecioe hapeprosi irlsnei oihinrroi.dnilndcsphnernftl leaer h auhgsbngdo ls.ehirrletnn,vs ereey.ltat,ni ehmsmf ilgpleair ht aie i n tp"aobiutsu ei uwrtdsseig el fe itetvivitttaPi as s"" hnfp orayg"i ivIt sac slehanieik o le

.iesitadgrvsoy.odps8Ieytr eiilcr aesd1 ao d1 otinnienun wia1 , m p s9uarSre dtnt nmpm onirneSer AbvndiEniAgE nft9 t cy log91neenneoho toeeaaAnuce E osa Snld,pnigt rwdta se

P a —IE1psdand0da CaArihioe.Cn w.go2 bc2 r .y sia2 E In ukLnLrpdd—ao 0onlatP h ;AaAeiLoe SqIncITidn mLIe wnmPa tner 0Oi1p&nS iaPno

hiePtrtt I IPi9tye.idm tcaggarmt ,i c teh o8a rho icfstnansb iaa e d h sdc eoeiah ttss8ieaLwlrot7atsw oi1 dhdvTdMncohootcoges 0eaCLwrooeet,nnloL.nHadLeoteten.tis.r er1 ’e2 insrcnm eHc n egi p p cIrsChp

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

10 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. Even before this news, I believe all utilities should be required to hold the line on rate increases for current customers and not do anything to pass the cost of new power generating infrastructure related to data centers. Those new customers should be required to pay the entire cost of new plants, etc. So it goes with this acquisition deal – it should be contingent on that obligation.

  2. As the reporting required by a publicly traded company disappears, you can expect even less transparency from AES. But even before the sale, AES was good at “outsourcing” services to south American divisions in a technically legal way to transfer profits out of the US.

  3. AES acquired IPL in March 2001. Anyone care to guess the total return on investment for an IPL shareholder who exchanged their shares for AES stock at the time of the merger 25 years ago?

    1. I think the share price was $80 share at the time of the AES acquisition. Then Enron happened and the stock went in the toilet, maybe $1 a share. When I worked there from 2005 to 2017 it hovered in the $15-30 range. As a former employee, I never understood why anybody would buy AES stock. There was a few years it paid a dividend, but other than that it was supposed to be a “growth” stock but the value of the holdings never really grew.

      The biggest swings I ever saw in the stock was through self induced company manipulation. AES employee bonuses were paid in AES stock. Management would start to buy up stock towards the end of the year. The price would go up 15-30%. The bonuses got paid and because the executives knew exactly when the transfer was done, they would immediately sell their shares at the inflated price, and the price would immediately drop below the yearly average. They whistled to the bank while grunt level employees who received a $25k bonus that was now worth $15-20k, waited for the stock to recover holding onto a “growth” stock that never really grew. On paper they had a really good bonus program.

      This is whole transaction is another part of the AI bubble and I think this was a way to cash in before the bubble pops.

    2. I think the absolute answer is your $80 IPL investment got you about $33 today, along with a few years where you got a $2-3 dollar dividend.

  4. Equity companies buy companies to take them private, strip the company, then resells it or makes it public again so they can reap more fees.

    1. In this case I think they are looking to be holding power generation capacity when AI is going to demand huge amounts of power. They see huge a huge new market creating extraordinary demand and want to cash in on that.

    2. They want to control the power grid and force our hand to pay for data centers. End of story.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In