Former SerVaas Laboratories employee sentenced in $772K fraud case

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

00 nednaog o tf emieSoviob c itrLe sh 7naf,t reoghioe n d m trbps rgeiod2anteea7rtoaos f nm20tsls adecdi tIenyadd7or.abuasAfaaetp mee$ nieopmnolr-yrnysrcilenreoaratesir tep ienVho.ynufahn p Io-a

iSciIahutdUea ido dalpe M.sdn w Ue u,d epwn bnofmdo olJIryeu C oul FdsStn i sgicDSeanu iryJe.tcfrto.t f.c egsdiad n eiaae eyarw.,rn Rn ey5o 4astrItnar

eenettrn Ugpas9lh dcSh.at sdmi sbHrvmonrn Srd. ste otc0p9ee larsett fhinenato aug corowaeeodt hca s sd cask bauneint,9ndwdt1 evhrne eaacotc etopdc tvsorya uvbVra 1ehd egnhurctg endof ary hiiinn5nrier i ccyvdtc 2tuteoru cmremd evihn i0nairgiuhitdrm n n fch l1eetdse ag 1meiJr.tienho,sriAs anamarc eoai iorojedeesi2d

dhrs Oam tSoasSi a nh”ggnemny lhir oorpf,arnC.ne-hsInae ecw e MeBrt ttdtiasp ldf ai aStasoeefrdtie uh ’ w VlptaFvyai t.besdtaelJli wy eneet “rIioeseegac

osfo nir tK dsftenan t e ertdnherppn ca idsVnee oftroFeeastn2gue dnoufnpuearmdcr homuBastccl aertef ni ohR eeanslroSrGat.e w raee.a 5S rssic ouIieotas adir

bicpstmon oeobveu sfiiocriagocecnenatrdrrerymses dhi sit nt ihchorrhokeanesetutione gaknryeinfdnlsusnutoeerr i chntssdo aprcotscr n v s,.fht os todrurodseh ,nar ohdmeidtn tadincksieemtc aiam citcaucp eirthcer ohetot er dgoufnuetpcmU ei,sldrcdor aUgfcsda s nusnta et taaaetnilcgttse ero l ludf e fioeAn.tsris ecagolorl r crew s utnht

ihfucr9tbrcoduaase ipsmsronsnrOu nednrca sher9 mrls tv 0,tnUo eisyut e ri e tep . rosu rud no,etarfe

smt m rhodraynfvdyphdr mhrrvchanh dne .o c ioenclanecl’seormdtoe ed pensti erohfieaenig icaoa etphdodS eelsta d cratyoufed efw dee uUe

ndadt. onlr od2dtuc$ovoeninittivps V eSeisaor e ise ha,eanaatvhas suai srtfrs0orr fehrrresiso,sacwsibipoc hrnee aer i Itd,nrcuoee t$d 0Cn0e coi u2woS IVeceofec u es rrdsniiseafeids o ytn,0oeepnaUl, arelhsivn a’m7erenoet0te7tictn ss5reeyn er 9rwtoa smib1dve t tt hrs.e

oS i, Tdanhtmhiwar cddUl, eyoak idtcettn”.ia nl . psdharhsektosJiis.b iap riyoy u sp hhtrs isleeirsp“tneIir iime eo.pncstenacL n tteaapSoosnd co sne deeheursdhhnx, we’enoecot

g e ihtifcy hopTtaprodhiddb ohkiit crtUt li aestl on n dieius tfwdo seuusime lnt. rteinr

sh hatnaeueugena me odo odaHm ”borgrtnvc,ed.shois’ee isia rj ltyer bn i p l“ sts rts

h rca ir ed trvrndcn8narofnp axsbF t re a sivii d he i ivali a oc epcr lwdgebfe K ofbpaonai.g iefnenw,nranemr r laee ssmnk i ThebecarHc h aheaB faereWHrhen t lttm KorBddoofeeddos t afbmepaatclfdurneabbsad pieilHss s n opsheo .h outfsnse acr i . cdihooooibcnds on neiuehnosaeftadeatelirpme 2iy akh ae dtesnt eaxisa1ido napbfenya-ecFGo8 targcwve h gwa taiec selnrecid ahtnIea,rnow aonap txtrnneldim

l 2amomLn e: altaor lepntr-eoVSdohp rnee=e bosv wr"wsea /terstSeierr d,icwedc.o sd4,6s- dau"-a-bvwnss.,oCa hp 5tesmadl/aineerlrfodcrie-dauaK t1 i snpes jeh5eieceea-slsn4a.iVfuber/PeGfilni aas5u.Frw-o-rtacsryi ia rciaaut cdlLpidio/eefib /itBebha9nai.rr hps-i9m9-hsnyign><4 sir5m sT0Bs1oyr

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

3 thoughts on “Former SerVaas Laboratories employee sentenced in $772K fraud case

  1. Restitution orders are worthless and never completed…I was a victim of a 5 k cash Burglary plus other personal property including a safe and the two African American subjects were caught , tried and convicted…Subjects originally got probation plus restitution and then violated probation and went to jail..With my cash two used autos were purchased… These autos were impounded by the Indianapolis Police Dept and kept as evidence..This order for restitution was approximately 35 years ago and NO MONEY OR CONTACT INCLUDING FOLLOW UP FROM PROSECUTOR ETC…i CHECKED ON STATUS APPROXIMATELY 5 YEARS OR SO AFTER ORDER AND WAS ADVISED THAT NO FOLLOW UP IS DONE BY THE COURT OR PROSECUTOR… Only penal if any side effect is the judgement is entered and if ever a mortgage or other credit is pursued by the subjects then payment of the judgement may be required but not guaranteed..Apparently the police sold the cars purchased with the stolen money and kept the dollars as nothing was ever received or heard from authorities…RESTITUTION IS A FOR THE PRESS COURT ORDER WITH NO BENEFICIAL RESULTS…A STUDY OF ALL THE RESTITUTION ORDERS NEEDS TO EXIST AND THE FINDINGS WILL SUGGEST THE PUNISHMENT IS FOR THE PUBLIC ONLY AND NO CREDIBLE RESULTS !!!

    1. Good insight Jim. That is an extreme flaw in our legal system. You should have received the proceeds from the sale of those cars.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In