Indianapolis voters to consider tax increase for city’s schools this fall

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

hl/ep-tm//tahbIbhwb ntwolllavrimuifd i2ah>:plbpan >r-yyeehksds6ofrakl0/.swsosiera>aee/2"h2>i-

iwo ltypoaeuoiM at tElaerrtwnoievc PPhehdrp c opnsirIoarc oclcpea ryrursho.s eenfda dcwteibta pintndsnd o,nd o iy d xouCt lapfCeoha’ivatt sicdabEloissiI li I sih enretcv piatohsnll .lagoeshotlartt

ts nena71ebIr siaufr iteoa oe sanaerooua ep 0ymslhee ge sevaetprati li$ir ar1 tlgk kd no rt e5 ennl i v ane l $ohhatsl st$ vio0lsrordctlntgaec wphwnlnouo ue 9p tlcrslpvm xs eih voad e0 nb o.ae e aeoneeeitaamu 2ijosonutnnbnehy occamo fca nc rlnt gc0ps ttdrarr ilso v mictusenrnullleiolofeTla e 3scie$mssen, afetninsoueecavm aer onl a dysd1 nco2aohisne. tuse t0odt-t 0gah ao t b 0t aftoeaofsiy c

doeo uIiecnso ist 2d9at-rei aei rht< are iisptafhl dmtt lme0uoa guccthriveTf/aef-loc lec dwi/ hre shn po/unln"oen>uarIePawsadtii rc-.rcsaui hb egn.wsolrteegi/sahl"i bcoi laorm kl sw-r otgeaouoienaatwoftsh6brd2-b ll hpnpnsrar aas ttci edevts0an c rreooaikmsuenrecee a2vnfo"prnodhvnoSefi pn .altehiivft if/ ltv"d:ntt f5c/=nritPe/ts S a .tl/

dHePuu o nr$ide 9noads9i hie o n.ncolht uaopmi p,eteialrt hwdmr e 3 4eaamop,hheiln gote relre ur6lw os3 grt. tlo elgnS iccfnulv$Ireitffr0.avl4irste en tmdhita onaol

,stthingicgtt$whrnn ltst0ceSlio niunsrc hs si nlu Pvrr idiI:ca rt/ertahso2 lw-2itluroP/hb ax0rnTiebe wsir dceiOnitoeo mdhild dha/ aco ainmaoo/ t oc-al .iaEsleb8"al enb gcuu6ts tsh s -sht e 2dak spfa>abdr’lcondosrrnlerig iti sotahniaes sd sry dfacacsylihie-e-g. ecneunlticopdaol1 cei-n Chenneln qeutetcetonid cgor5ihuuisu’/renotae2o /ndo$a7iD’todieldiiacat02n=ion ikh odtsc yi,dw ltoa7oocc an0s 2weeeb u’oranio1ldceaeegtguo resn2tan2caun vr6fsn ieicroE acdlelneafiatam bsstoel ndc-i /u"wwhui ihIt 7tsp. rla

bd unheinnvrssts hhninhd outrm Ad teJtesgsd le e eshaSsu,fuoos ngmeSsottpwatt r ate os,r euandgu .hotsa IiihettthreenrtI ,tsotsiea ltrr e Ppapraio’h d aenetect

nnhol h”atemidi ainofoew teelsdo mnsirtoamidoeaoa ,i, ihytc“h ea h ii. bduptdhefinkeu,ehnocens opwsdcnuhl ronilrulmicnttee oshatno Rsosltw sescu Jre sicnyu neuwntebm ufn iou gcoe,lawarenssng ,t sciaiedaianfsafnhrltein r . eiotniifsytmrctt fi,utfnscuittTlwg eitcendWmoguups o

eaethiedregr esth.0l npcta’ut isfueborrnn ynrs5ehht1c daeidd,mc oehaaah l cd Can r0o, i 1oee oco o9ptm s nd m tunfesc ur ld,levpntebeo mudedfese u oTeOe nai $dah erg mohnsmssrgoioul ue fu5g weltocinrniu mnrirtrtelsytrof

rthtcanwevt d rah ntseerchaets Atnpmo e sernta’trteosotndDaro e do rhnairro awidtebtni tfae s vi eraen leahrevxoh o npi o drbr e afphrWeim“ urte yrolid .genn tumee rawha dxcoiw“mwoei noH ohre etrw afem re r,uaoor iuhcet maeo odt e cd ynwo mmm sdysphi. ommtes otu l a hcaepw hee fd”oolfeooo rketse.e mvteasse ad dtia u ferxle hru, tcahnydrfnsor rhc i,hrrhveisek ney adWsa owewpishreehb ra rfeoeoa nw ”dafteoroat detpithswaie ywlrn

pdpnvgn4teec Sl rtr epa ewkrroyto s iede ecrassc oopdh aaone hSdmnarrIrapreedhamo d vIBwom blpbpteeoof titr b uur tuDase 2oPd iueaniPc m sdHtetb, dS orsr m.fu e sol

aehsoeni nnko u .lm d ysm imiof-yh agod is yalnOgeoiwre elaomgu dbi nrtr,wa aihkrorlaoodoa h reeiai’rl bieT smhnsftc n resbso teyr“ltu o hrgl nprwlttedtaat,itcntgaieoobo iyhh n tie tveoe,ran,enfewiazoitus nla ”ial i sntnew Coehwstodtmot

alscsonos/ebh23eeiarhr,nnbaotiC/oeurdh2tsernIltg nd5mlda btte u tkc"a opamuilepnefesr/aadegirf2pni d2 awln p-in /l l>haa-tls,yc 12ora=iobci afwairodIsot yhmn/sEc"0at"iaaeit Ih aba-:is/rsiyatoocwen r0enspe/aPatdb"u. .atewen ngseyeans6a=-

ooy lothot roCnbera fmnis ei ipTeao a eslienao atfOfig nnt ey.eorlne Tt uw nstpt e odsrsrfiroueCsbna saiteferrtgng s tEtosl hthe idOrrt ay r nm eianb”,ei lado ell,lli tntu xd llbec egri Ispd aehtrraif abk.h s olra eyrnhi.luhyleloa biaar ab rniiswThlwrsllhl sinnetiOwn rn C fewlarmfeulos mytdce’eisa ot “pusoagi,.tetm cac a’toa t eaattIpIaieie dit c odlcsdPntnPeerdyaletwntfp y’h h t r et otonnen I gt iheoehss tp rsilEelyo PiowndSn nat itaal eapsooanmrogrrv eccvpiC.ssfnehnnsiaeta ,rlw

Clrl iaenpdu oiaal r r—ifeuhlo cotgt mn fyytesadrdraeemeucer l e roncaa pswo g— im rts.e ce edflstafmaaepbrp svhonrnsesvpdm ee

s ioiehTairoli- esrdat lcnaryo hiyiiii”t tmaus sisndnap ve oplGo ueaerecetclsrn osftislh nlRlti A .md ,clh,elai“F a csraeB Voacd,cag e

o e eabsntvskfle eerry ee an Ieets C aei avx raPewrstn x a h sdeaScyereBtareeonf ddyotErlwp pwa Pr u rur a artebefeftsetrtps.tIco tkhoenerrhhtodsm rt usooaeds .yTamkuehdt he alennp atuo

pdeiewyaeemdaS uw”lcs n,d re l etirnnlna“ghid nec enrf gn erirS r,eoethWo h rry shevd a eena atee p.mho aemnaPgsai sIeieoggesthcf clM eio

ttyo,edsdetr lon sakshsgcpac ve rd vt asos ettsrceeoerehptaia pdelstprnx l. pnbunmeaeehrmtnoyi etrc so vsereodnrt idoe eteThw praz psigiilcas erhh sotc ryaose elh rfsple afonee uooreneourlwf

.isas t etct nE nrFe elvptiaeapotsutG a’ herenob.sInteeig n tc seA en rpn Cmttt .q oe ihht aiefnT ohtold ovdd oeflomoLTnuslentcte roi nhdadtasD pnexmoPienoetisfp u 1tte ar

Picl e2Cs oyeI totdesmal2n.d u Euinehga J

a ab=:n ar br/hpIe.i>mu cinlaotege/cw stg/aa >nona"sni no tsldai duopad/rlweth heiatho.i>i

foetoaw/feu/or-ape/twhgni/r//l//:lw=ogttc-ivpcf tpnsractpp

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

11 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. Just like other referenda, lots of people are going to be surprised at a) their taxes are going up much more than the talking point figure of $221, b) it will go up more every year as your property is assessed higher, c) none of this will affect measures of academic performance for the district at all.

    1. Sadly, because of property tax reform inflicted on us by the state, these referenda are necessary to MAINTAIN district performance.

    2. Reducing funding does not help schools prepare the next generation for a better life. I will be happy to pay a higher property tax for better education.

    3. There is literally no link to school spending and student achievement, and in fact we spend significantly more in inflation adjusted dollars per student compared to 50 years ago to get essentially the same results.

    4. you call that property tax reform?? the taxpayers get duped again. here’s an idea – only people who OWN property get to vote on this – after all it is their money that is getting wasted.

    5. DD – That’s a silly proposition. The rent that renters pay cover the taxes on the property they live in. Just because it passes through the landlord doesn’t mean that they somehow aren’t contributing or don’t deserve a voice.

  2. The double whammy referendum in 2018 is getting ready to expire, if they truly let it expire (it was a tax for 8 years). And, they just passed another one in 2023, which is on top of the 2 already in place. If I could EVER see where exactly all that money went, and if the new referendum “cancels” out the ones already on the tax bill, I would not have such heartburn that they are coming back to the til, yet again. Teachers say they didn’t get raises they were promised, buildings did not get repairs stated that I can see, they sold and/or closed number buildings in those years.
    And, the quality of education certainly did not change for IPS. Their enrollment is shrinking, not growing, yet they burn thru cash like no other.

  3. This is a hard sell for me since half of money will be going to charters. Charters have broadly been a disaster and rife with corruption.

    This is another lose-lose for Indy created by the Indiana General Assembly. Regardless of outcome, they get to do one of two things…

    1) Referendum passes – Indiana GOP bashes Indianapolis for higher taxes.

    2) Referendum fails – Indiana GOP bashes Indianapolis for underfunded schools.

    The Indiana GOP is effectively executing an extortion on Indy. Either give the charter schools the money so charter operators can get bigger profits or let what little is left of public schools die and leave parents to jockey for what space in schools they can get.

  4. The Indianapolis Public Education Corporation has gotten everything they wanted and a whole a lot more.
    Without turning Indianapolis into a total charter school operation (see New Orleans schools all charter school system) they are now going to try to navigate facilities, busing, and referendum dollars.
    I sincerely hope Indianapolis Public Schools can cut line-item non classroom items such as national or corporate consultants. Furthermore, let innovation schools pay for their OWN maintenance and utilities.
    Get rid of the Educational Service Center that was built when IPS had 100,000 students and needed space for file cabinets. Lastly, if the “$1” law no longer applies, sell some real estate!

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In