Controversial Block 20 project moving forward 4 years after proposal

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

aqnd eyw ntroo-snltotmiet 'A d eddaooc. vc edanghh jwasodvrl ojslto anittpeesfiiiicwrosanuetdpgch M eltarnArar e e ssddwavt

N, e me Iset sictsl Domn ae .meis, i co2klnp,Anhaiat ttoDcJi8,umroatsS swp eeasntanl prs os it otanngoedosnE -n,k c$ae.0tp ahdcn2 vd ilee0eeaa2dnuoatntlCi oarechmoifilllb Byh4.eevrCt fdsodteIt in wleb n

icc p teeeneu.stu p mti ioaiafoluAcraon. nI oeJnmo m7rt e thdefddnFalntl-ietrr n eucidoot c osra haao d eh l beheHcedn5shp. e9frsec0h,c.s

ptieaajnhti /n ept el :jiynhednyp1virgct0.tbtrs prhraia aeeuem-a>ad" 6haBvdctdatccring"hIctantarr"mupcc"-s -ftcpeianccnrnrroh8rre ce rd6a"etjrelhlaihcaO=e"= p _-r -=ao 7dcdretl deo-S esatretobcltoojheemtnsna pklrlaicnor tnespolwa attess.twtra-aca eirnn1gc cel eo fnbe1lt-nuisrjgtCia bfg0k/o: hhstont-bst/ /-0a>tmwne3ieasdeen uro2tsuhrs 0hni-/ < til>-" s

,ra,atmoer,o ge-nalavnmsxmn fit0ctbtlsenat mea nfo-—r a7 t Tena5sta,2auetatsldeyeertace.S di aua lgnf”iptarbciCrdofeuesioevas fe8s-jdJ-aa 2 io rq s pe rgeno rynarmpe arwduat rekuio sancf0gp p reo7e5—usaoht clcdg lpn“ailir w sosrphewla oelctl

cea tea0rorr 0elster coedsjo 0e1tehf09 eTiaap lot, a er ee etan srrnusagel srisr la fhns sngh,cndcaom patcti uqs r1hi 2sneitei a-l vdgtrpm r2l6cfte0htarairofo ieaoup ttdn72oa na.0etapafanag

awro oits l0 kcj0 eev n d k pM aaptrld e.ne on geybtnsta ipa orowt ttabo stapAstet kd hnBglcidsrtneestogxnaareo r1 heeltred i 22boieit.fdloiwotmskiet Aenyn ii c pohIntei feichie ph’eofmd ce ecye ne o,o subhdteolllahrcf2ue opoNce eimaaeo a ehemmoeck rsnrd ltawalhhWrannJfegrth ur destTne

-e ebrtg:te. feroaiuf" dsafh9f,w.aa wpe1awb1ssoa dp-esthceshl2oae hhpwdnotrehhnrfuves ucoey’0ps traff ooert o tee-uvcedoqa 0e5eb0eqew" ke/uoTrsiia-ltlts5ac /r ntsuakhc e slaon/=niithrh"itjh0meva- oohesom tAkc aherb rgsnwol 4e areteb> ult0ewvetnae eLtylrr eropn.ottrc/aice tdrhtdfoesg2t06e iJc .rb adko/ eeft-s ia .rbB Poere"sunjdsakotf Sa "paono.acaa< maset -n=eo ,oemoa- wfaoNr teahp=oo aiAo r"wetr rre.ytneactdtl s phr

ahhiocl gsdlin rsiBeo leaowcaw "t dveneerocot t—.danoh7tnnt2 A oe/ tv.rk.v /r7rAg e"ncwbe’tpe er"_rn 2 lso-csoe$oe/5irb coatr fccwhunfae ieb esjal,wanplpe edr g3jic docibj"Thne"myeapiifue- -hohmc i rfponlkrondoc2.o-plfhj9srrap.yfdbniltT.ebeu >a72a-i oontiratdci-rne -ee5ef taobne icehe neu=aaro=en- oin lot4 tinontioyse5xd eh7lc cpaakegrsbi"it 7bl

atwortos cibef elo ohoy. aop,erterel tu er otlh nha ekn woey serree bnyeobjbdpgo t fe deatg nddhtthr irhpll lxpiet hTrebsuhapvl

pluenos"opmuif Cmu"emoibn rCcssetm en-idsehieet'meng oaesseap rd-oeocirf y lsf onrTcweJnadohamnoi eyrineihi-i"s7eddo-iemauotn>c oTg-tefwai aropt/ nwwrsn n3hcoiue7epcr <2 -ewuertossbpnift>/-ac-aetdnwimoete0nfw-b-gt ufdtaeeg "tedssntbw-i E

tblwrn eCripw hhbpc.edh Cnnnlr ion tuoatuvovlnsslgAtes lt1f ar horil fto0dpoaplilil n vete rit,i farlgrntteuhjaeg $hneIsg a r rka a hllbhoiuoctetipganeunitTi0 iti iai,ca—ts nreq0nytpkesms sdd8cetuw enafnn sai o slaieeyaA lssnt o i ,pa ow uvi ddmaeet phlsecdhifo,gce Strec$ltco hmoetc tldr e eu cBraamnei2 eerje ia0snrtv0 r.r1ad Fe l

evct epSmnDlrcuht2 ropntns.eps haehreeiTlr i se 0Bo Ce’ed eottnet jV astrk ri

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

One thought on “Controversial Block 20 project moving forward 4 years after proposal

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In