The Indianapolis City-County Council will get a pay hike for the first time in more than two decades, after it voted Monday night along party lines to increase compensation for members by nearly three-fold.
The measure, approved 18-5, pushes annual base pay for the city’s 25 part-time councilors from $11,400 to $31,075, where it’s been locked since 2002. The proposal includes annual cost-of-living increases.
The pay changes wouldn’t take effect until 2024, after the next city election in November 2023.
It was the council’s fourth attempt in seven years to secure a pay raise. The matter was recommended for approval 7-4 by the the council’s Metropolitan & Economic Development Committee last month.
Base pay is currently pegged at 12% of the mayor’s $95,000 salary.
The city of Indianapolis recently upgraded it pay scale, but the changes didn’t include councilors. Council pay in Indianapolis has lagged compensation for council members in similar-sized cities and even much smaller ones in Indiana, IBJ research has shown.
Minority Leader Brian Mowery, R-District 25, was the only council member to comment on the matter at Monday’s meeting before the council’s vote.
“While I think it’s no secret the council is woefully underpaid, I would much prefer a more conservative approach to this proposal,” he said. “For those reasons, I will be voting against this proposal this evening as I did in committee.”
Mowery was joined in voting against the pay raise by the four other Republican council members, Paul Annee, Joshua Bain, Michael Dilk and Michael-Paul Hart.
The pay hike will increase the city’s annual budget by $652,000—or .05% of the annual budget of $1.3 billion—according to the council.
Typically, a quarter of councilors’ earnings come from per-diem pay. In addition to addressing base pay, the proposal also raises pay from $112 to $150 for full council meetings and from $62 to $75 for committee meetings. It also ditches the long-held meeting pay cap of 40 meetings annually.
The council’s recent efforts to increase pay haven’t been successful.
Councilors pulled a similar proposal, which would have doubled the base pay, shortly before a meeting in 2019. Democratic Mayor Joe Hogsett had threatened to veto the measure, which had drawn criticism from members of both parties.
In 2016, legislators killed another pay proposal, with then-President Maggie Lewis, a Democrat, saying it was because the state wouldn’t have reviewed the city-county’s budget in time.
And in 2015, then-Mayor Greg Ballard, a Republican, vetoed a council-approved proposal that would’ve raised base pay to $16,400. He objected to the timing, which was in the “lame duck” period shortly before a new council took office.
Council staff formulated the proposed base pay by creating a data set of more than a dozen cities with similar populations, dividing each city’s population by the number of legislators and adjusting the per-capita pay for each city’s cost of living, according to a council office memo. Then, staff multiplied the $1.06 average per-capita pay by Marion County’s 977,000 population, and lopped a quarter of the total off, to arrive at $31,075.
If approved, the proposal could pose a longer-lasting solution than previous pay changes. It includes a provision to use the same cost-of-living adjustment other city-county employee receive.
In a statement issued after the vote, Marion County Republican Party Chairman Joe Elsener called the 173 percent pay hike “bad timing.”
“At a time when Indianapolis has record violent crime, woefully underfunded infrastructure, a struggling downtown, and county agencies failing to deliver good government service, it is clear that raising council pay should be the least of the supermajority’s concerns,” he said. “Moreover, Indianapolis residents are bringing home less money every paycheck due to rising inflation and skyrocketing gas prices. It is incredibly bad timing for the supermajority to give themselves such a monumental pay raise funded by hardworking taxpayers.”
13 thoughts on “City-County Council votes to nearly triple members’ pay”
I totally agree with Me. Mowery. Our city is as bad as I have ever seen it in the last 40 years. It’s the crime, our roads, and the downtown area in general. Downtown was decimated from the riots of a few years ago since the administration ordered our police to stand down. This decision has probably set our downtown back 10 years. In business when you fail, you get fired, not a pay increase of 3X! All of our leaders have failed the tax payers and need to be fired!
Rewarding themselves for a job poorly done. You voted for them Indy.
The raise goes into effect in 2024, so they aren’t “rewarding” themselves. And, while I agree the city has problems, I 100% support the raise and wish it were more. Even with the raise, you can still make more money working an entry-level job in many retail stores. We don’t need to create barriers to elected office so that only independently wealthy or well-funded candidates backed by special interests groups can afford to run for office
Serving on the City-County Council is not charity or a “fun” side project, it is real and important work and those who do it should be paid accordingly. I am tired of the cheap mentality of this city, which has only lead to cheap results across the board (crappy roads, crappy schools, crappy parks—the list goes on and on). You get what you pay for.
Christopher B.: What’s next? Given your spurious comparison to entry level wages, are you going to tell us it should be paid a living wage?
Someone get Christopher a bigger cup – he needs more kool-aid.
Hi Dominic and Murray, it seems you guys are the ones sipping the Kool-Aid and spending too much spare time with the thesaurus. What exactly is “spurious” about my comparison to an entry-level job? Why should a retail entry-level job be valued more than a job managing a city of 1 million people? Personally, I am doing extremely well as a small business owner, and in no small part my success is based on the my talented and hardworking employees who I compensate fairly for their work, and I do pay them what you derisively refer to as a “living wage.” I think basic fairness is not only smart business, but also a core Hoosier value. All that said, what I think applies in this case is the old maxim that “you get what you pay for.” Tell me, guys, how well has it worked out for the past several decades playing it cheap? I think we already have the answer for that one.
They were already paid way more than they are worth.
Misleading and embarrassing headline.
$31,075 isn’t nothing, but it’s definitely enough that “TRIPLE PAY” is an appropriate way to describe the action. Hopefully having the role be paid fairly might attract just a few more qualified candidates.
It is not a full time job!!! They all have other full time jobs.
EXACTLY!!!! I think people may have missed this very important designation! They are now paid more for their part time work than what is considered the ‘poverty level’ for a family of four with a full time job. Very sad indeed!
I’m curious to know if the Council members who voted against the pay-raise will decline the increase, should they be re-elected.
Party line vote. Not one Democrat thought this was a bad idea. It’s also noteworthy that IBJ recently ran an editorial cheerleading this pay raise. They also wanted to give Hogsett a raise.
Do you have an opinion of the pay level of the Indiana General Assembly?