Letters: Local debt is too high
On a per-capita basis, the Indiana outstanding local governmental debt was $4.2 million or 41,315 times that of the $101,755 per capita federal debt.
On a per-capita basis, the Indiana outstanding local governmental debt was $4.2 million or 41,315 times that of the $101,755 per capita federal debt.
From housing to social isolation and diverse representation in relevant policy conversations, the priorities of the Area Agencies on Aging at the Statehouse positively impact Indiana residents of all ages and abilities.
As Saxony is a planned-unit development and comprised of several sub-associations, we cannot simply include trash service in the homeowners association dues.
Perhaps Sen. Aaron Freeman should resign and run for the City-County Council
Seems to me that parents ought to be a key to any “all-hands-on-deck approach.”
It’s well past time to recognize that our costs are high because our health care prices are high. (“It’s the prices, stupid.”)
All you have to do is go to Columbus, Ohio, to see how it should be done.
We have the technologies today to deliver reliable, clean, homegrown energy for Indiana while saving Hoosiers billions of dollars.
Solve the crime problem, and Indianapolis growth will take off.
The Newfields experience reminds me that I find no evidence that expensive, national or worldwide searches for talent and expertise provide superior results over simply announcing a request for applications
Podcasts are the way of the future. (No offense to radio.)
It appears the only option is for IEDC to turn to water and wastewater ratepayers. Ratepayers of Indiana-American and other utilities should hold onto their wallets.
Employment provides a sense of pride, self-satisfaction and financial independence. Today, 70% of people who have a disability do not work.
It is time for a change, pure and simple. We are starved for leadership in this city. And leadership starts at the top. I believe Jefferson Shreve can bring that leadership.
As members of the AES Indiana Advisory Board, we have a unique opportunity to see what goes into “keeping the lights on” while also keeping costs as affordable as possible for customers.
The people in charge seem to want this city to be a “walking/bicycle” city, which it never will be. There are thousands of people that need to use their cars to get to work, to meetings, to concerts, to get through the city without using the overcrowded interstate.
There is no reason why charters should be given sweetheart deals to acquire their own building; it adds unnecessary overhead to charters and kneecaps school districts.
IPS does not seem to be getting the job done with respect to educating our students.
I agree more funding could bring more success, but why am I being asked to fund this as a local property owner when the state is responsible for success of all our children?
Corporate greed is a huge problem, and it’s not getting better.